A Limiting Factor of Sex Attractants of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), Verified under Laboratory Conditions

Simple Summary Sexual attractants have emerged as a labor-saving and environmentally friendly technology for green pest control. The Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, a global agricultural pest, is often managed using sex attractants such as methyl eugenol as part of green control measures. However, the practical efficacy of these attractants in field applications is often challenged due to the high mating frequency exhibited by male B. dorsalis individuals. In this study, we aimed to investigate the reproductive capacity of B. dorsalis under continuous mating conditions and assess the variations in reproductive ability under different mating conditions. The study highlights the importance of continuous pest control measures due to the pests’ strong reproductive ability under interval mating conditions. By comprehending these dynamics, researchers can develop improved strategies for green pest control, thus reducing the reliance on harmful pesticides and ensuring sustainable agricultural practices. These findings have valuable implications for society by promoting environmentally friendly pest management techniques, ultimately benefiting both crop production and the environment. Abstract At present, sexual attractants mainly control insect populations by killing males. However, the effect of sex attractants may be limited by the mating ability of the attracted insects. The Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), has a strong reproductive capacity; it brings great losses to agricultural production, which can be controlled by methods using sex attractant methyl eugenol that mainly attracts males. Therefore, we studied the multiple and continuous (as well as consecutive) mating ability of B. dorsalis through behavioral experiments. The results show that male B. dorsalis can mate 11 times on average, with females mating only 1.93 times, and that 10.81% of males mate more than 20 times. The reproductive capacity of male B. dorsalis decreased significantly after four to five instances of continuous mating. In different mating patterns, the reproductive fitness of polyandry is not the highest, rather, interval mating is the best. A limiting factor of the sex attractant effect was revealed in B. dorsalis through behavioral evidence.

[1]  Roberto García‐Roa,et al.  Thermal phenotypic plasticity of pre- and post-copulatory male harm buffers sexual conflict in wild Drosophila melanogaster , 2023, bioRxiv.

[2]  S. Abraham,et al.  Postcopulatory Behavior of Tephritid Flies. , 2022, Annual review of entomology.

[3]  N. Flores-Estévez,et al.  Oviposition after sex: mated Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) females increase oviposition without receiving an ejaculate , 2021, The Canadian Entomologist.

[4]  T. Price,et al.  The impact of female mating strategies on the success of insect control technologies. , 2021, Current opinion in insect science.

[5]  R. Kurashima,et al.  Field Capture of Male Oriental Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Traps Baited with Solid Dispensers Containing Varying Amounts of Methyl Eugenol , 2021 .

[6]  R. Kurashima,et al.  Field Capture of Male Mediterranean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Traps Baited with Varying Amounts of Trimedlure , 2020, Florida Entomologist.

[7]  M. Jennions,et al.  An experimental test for body size‐dependent effects of male harassment and an elevated copulation rate on female lifetime fecundity and offspring performance , 2019, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[8]  K. Tan.  Recaptures of feral Bactrocera dorsalis and B. umbrosa (Diptera: Tephritidae) males after feeding on methyl eugenol , 2019, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[9]  T. Collier,et al.  A field test on the effectiveness of male annihilation technique against Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) at varying application densities , 2019, PloS one.

[10]  S. Abraham,et al.  Methyl eugenol effects on Bactrocera dorsalis male total body protein, reproductive organs and ejaculate , 2018, Journal of Applied Entomology.

[11]  Connor T. Lambert,et al.  Genetic Monogamy in Socially Monogamous Mammals Is Primarily Predicted by Multiple Life History Factors: A Meta-Analysis , 2018, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[12]  S. Wee,et al.  Attraction and consumption of methyl eugenol by male Bactrocera umbrosa Fabricius (Diptera: Tephritidae) promotes conspecific sexual communication and mating performance , 2017, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[13]  Jun Ma,et al.  Interspecific Competition Between Ceratitis capitata and Two Bactrocera Spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) Evaluated via Adult Behavioral Interference Under Laboratory Conditions. , 2017, Journal of economic entomology.

[14]  L. Keller,et al.  Sexual selection shapes development and maturation rates in Drosophila , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  H. Chi,et al.  Demographic Analysis of Sex Ratio on Population Growth of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) With Discussion of Control Efficacy Using Male Annihilation. , 2016, Journal of economic entomology.

[16]  Samuel L. Díaz-Muñoz,et al.  “Monogamy” in Primates: Variability, Trends, and Synthesis: Introduction to special issue on Primate Monogamy , 2015, American Journal of Primatology.

[17]  Jinjun Wang,et al.  Female remating inhibition and fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) associated with male accessory glands , 2015 .

[18]  V. Sharma,et al.  Effects of polygamy on the activity/rest rhythm of male fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster , 2015, The Science of Nature.

[19]  H. Barclay,et al.  Models for Assessing the Male Annihilation of Bactrocera spp. with Methyl Eugenol Baits , 2014 .

[20]  D. McInnis,et al.  The effect of methyl eugenol exposure on subsequent mating performance of sterile males of Bactrocera dorsalis , 2013 .

[21]  B. Yuval,et al.  Intromission Induces and Insemination Reduces Female Immune Response in the Medfly , 2010, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[22]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Multiple mating increases female fitness in Drosophila simulans , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  N. Pike,et al.  The Effects of Selection for early (day) and late (dusk) Mating lines of Hybrids of Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis , 2003, Genetica.

[24]  W. Rice,et al.  Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  K. Kaneshiro,et al.  Acquisition of Female-Attracting Fragrance by Males of Oriental Fruit Fly from a Hawaiian Lei Flower, Fagraea berteriana , 1997, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[26]  T. Shelly,et al.  Chemically Mediated Mating Success in Male Oriental Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) , 1994 .

[27]  C. Boake,et al.  Behavioural influences on male mating success in the Oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  N. Lajis,et al.  Accumulation of phenylpropanoids in the rectal glands of males of the Oriental fruit fly,Dacus dorsalis , 1988, Experientia.

[29]  C. Roan,et al.  Light Intensity and Temperature as Factors Limiting the Mating of the Oriental Fruit Fly , 1954 .

[30]  F. Howlett.  Chemical reactions of fruit-flies , 1915, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[31]  P. Smith,et al.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[32]  Zhou Wan,et al.  Effect of methyl eugenol on male longevity, mating and female reproduction of Bactrocera dorsalis. , 2010 .

[33]  Yang Chunhua,et al.  Relationship between sex ratio and effective eggs amount of genetic sexual strain of oriental fruit fly. , 2010 .

[34]  A. Clarke,et al.  Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: the Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. , 2005, Annual review of entomology.

[35]  M. Bateman.  The Ecology of Fruit Flies , 1972 .