Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a new ultrashort contrast-enhanced (CE) MR angiography (MRA) for the morphologic evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The method was compared with conventional X-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and time-of-flight (TOF) MRA in 22 patients to assess the angioarchitecture of the malformations which is essential for treatment planning and follow-up. Two experienced MR readers independently evaluated both techniques with regard to the assessment of feeding arteries, AVM nidus, and venous drainage patterns. Contrast-enhanced MRA was able to detect all AVMs seen on DSA, whereas the TOF MRA failed in 1 patient with a very small AVM. In the assessment of the different vessel components of the AVM there was no difference for the detection and delineation of feeding arteries and the AVM. The venous drainage patterns could always be clearly delineated in the CE MRA, whereas TOF MRA could demonstrate the exact venous drainage in only 9 patients. Contrast-enhanced MRA was found to be superior to conventional TOF MRA in the assessment of the angioarchitecture of cerebral AVMs especially regarding the assessment of the venous drainage patterns. The superiority is supported by the improved vessel-to-background contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios. The major limitations of this new technique consist of a low spatial resolution at the used time resolution which can be improved by further sequence modifications. Contrast-enhanced MRA is thus an important additional imaging technique for treatment planning and follow-up of AVMs.

[1]  K. Schwab,et al.  The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: a 24-year follow-up assessment. , 1990, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  J. Adler,et al.  Current status and optimal use of radiosurgery. , 2001, Oncology.

[3]  Cerebrovascular surgery: past, present, and future. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[4]  F Colombo,et al.  External stereotactic irradiation by linear accelerator. , 1985, Neurosurgery.

[5]  P. Prescott,et al.  Issues in the Use of Kappa to Estimate Reliability , 1986, Medical care.

[6]  K. Kurisu,et al.  Demonstration of the venous systems with Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional phase-contrast MR venography , 2004, Neurosurgical Review.

[7]  G. Schroth,et al.  Dilemmas in the management of patients with arteriovenous malformations , 2000, Journal of Neurology.

[8]  G. Bednarz,et al.  Combining stereotactic angiography and 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in treatment planning for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  J. Chodkiewicz,et al.  Angioarchitecture associated with haemorrhage in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a prognostic statistical model , 1997, Neuroradiology.

[10]  R. Scienza,et al.  The relevance of anatomic and hemodynamic factors to a classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1991, Neurosurgery.

[11]  M Pla,et al.  Dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  C. Ogilvy Radiation Therapy for Arteriovenous Malformations: A Review , 1990, Neurosurgery.

[13]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Bentson,et al.  Therapeutic embolization of arteriovenous malformations: the case for and against. , 2000, Clinical neurosurgery.

[15]  E. Lo A haemodynamic analysis of intracranial arteriovenous malformations. , 1993, Neurological research.

[16]  Michael Bock,et al.  High‐resolution pulmonary arterio‐ and venography using multiple‐bolus multiphase 3D‐gd‐mRA , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  M. Wannenmacher,et al.  Clinically significant radiation reactions of the brain after radiosurgery , 1993 .

[18]  T. Hess,et al.  TOF-MR-Angiographie bei strahlentherapeutisch behandelten zerebralen arteriovenösen Malformationen : Magnetresonanzangiographie , 1994 .

[19]  M. Brock,et al.  Factors associated with intracranial hemorrhage in cases of cerebral arteriovenous malformation. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[20]  L R Schad,et al.  Separation of arteries and veins in 3D MR angiography using correlation analysis , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  L R Schad,et al.  Use of MR angiography for stereotactic planning. , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  R. Engenhart,et al.  Improved target volume definition in radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations by stereotactic correlation of MRA, MRI, blood bolus tagging, and functional MRI , 2004, European Radiology.

[23]  M. Wannenmacher,et al.  [Stereotactic single-dose irradiation of cerebral angioma]. , 1989, Der Radiologe.

[24]  B. Pertuiset,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of hemodynamic factors in cerebral arteriovenous malformations for selection of a radical surgery tactic with special reference to vascular autoregulation disorders. , 1982, Neurological research.

[25]  C. Ohye,et al.  Classification of arteriovenous malformations for radiosurgery. Neuroimaging, histopathology and radiobiologic effects. , 1995, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[26]  E. Knopp,et al.  MP‐RAGE subtraction venography: A new technique , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  E M Haacke,et al.  Gadolinium‐enhanced high‐resolution MR angiography with adaptive vessel tracking: Preliminary results in the intracranial circulation , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  R. Alberico,et al.  Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  G. Pike,et al.  Radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with the dynamic stereotactic irradiation. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  W Schlegel,et al.  Cerebral radiation surgery using moving field irradiation at a linear accelerator facility. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  R F Spetzler,et al.  A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. , 1986, Journal of neurosurgery.