Cross-competition in Editing of Chloroplast RNA Transcripts in Vitro Implicates Sharing of Trans-factors between Different C Targets*♦

C→U plant organellar RNA editing is required for the translation of evolutionarily conserved and functional proteins. 28 different C targets of RNA editing have been identified in maize chloroplasts, and hundreds of Cs are edited in mitochondria. Mutant analysis in Arabidopsis has indicated that absence of a single site-specific recognition protein can result in loss of editing of a single C target, raising the possibility that each C target requires a recognition protein. Here we show that transcripts encompassing two editing sites, ZMrpoB C467 and ZMrps14 C80, can compete editing activity from each other in vitro despite limited sequence similarity. The signal causing competition overlaps a 5′-cis element required for editing efficiency. A single five-nucleotide mutation spanning the region from –20 to –16 relative to the edited C of rpoB C467 is sufficient to eliminate its substrate editing as well as its ability to compete editing activity from rps14 C80 substrates. A corresponding mutation in an rps14 C80 competitor likewise eliminated its ability to compete editing activity from rpoB C467 substrates. Taken together, our results indicate that the RNA sequences mediating both editing efficiency and cross-competition are highly similar and that a common protein is involved in their editing. Sharing of trans-factors can facilitate editing of the large number of different C targets in plant organelles so that a different protein factor would not be required for every editing site.

[1]  Y. Notsu,et al.  The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) mitochondrial genome: frequent DNA sequence acquisition and loss during the evolution of flowering plants , 2002, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[2]  M. Hanson,et al.  Edited transcripts compete with unedited mRNAs for trans-acting editing factors in higher plant chloroplasts. , 2001, Gene.

[3]  J. Kudla,et al.  RNA editing in tobacco chloroplasts leads to the formation of a translatable psbL mRNA by a C to U substitution within the initiation codon. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[4]  A. Barkan,et al.  A nuclear mutation in maize blocks the processing and translation of several chloroplast mRNAs and provides evidence for the differential translation of alternative mRNA forms. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[5]  Maureen R. Hanson,et al.  Cross-Competition in Transgenic Chloroplasts Expressing Single Editing Sites Reveals Shared cis Elements , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[6]  M. Sugiura,et al.  Involvement of a site‐specific trans‐acting factor and a common RNA‐binding protein in the editing of chloroplast mRNAs: development of a chloroplast in vitro RNA editing system , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[7]  G. Igloi,et al.  Editing of a chloroplast mRNA by creation of an initiation codon , 1991, Nature.

[8]  Junichi Obokata,et al.  A site-specific factor interacts directly with its cognate RNA editing site in chloroplast transcripts , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Tillich,et al.  Editing of plastid RNA in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[10]  T. Shikanai,et al.  A pentatricopeptide repeat protein is essential for RNA editing in chloroplasts , 2005, Nature.

[11]  Gilles Peltier,et al.  A nucleus-encoded factor, CRR2, is essential for the expression of chloroplast ndhB in Arabidopsis. , 2003, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[12]  R. Bock,et al.  Introduction of a heterologous editing site into the tobacco plastid genome: the lack of RNA editing leads to a mutant phenotype. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[13]  M. Sugiura,et al.  Comparative Analysis of RNA Editing Sites in Higher Plant Chloroplasts , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[14]  M. Hanson,et al.  A single alteration 20 nt 5' to an editing target inhibits chloroplast RNA editing in vivo. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  G. Schuster,et al.  HCF152, an Arabidopsis RNA Binding Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein Involved in the Processing of Chloroplast psbB-psbT-psbH-petB-petD RNAs Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.010397. , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[16]  M. Sugiura,et al.  Recognition of RNA Editing Sites Is Directed by Unique Proteins in Chloroplasts: Biochemical Identification of cis-Acting Elements and trans-Acting Factors Involved in RNA Editing in Tobacco and Pea Chloroplasts , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  H. Handa,et al.  The complete nucleotide sequence and RNA editing content of the mitochondrial genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of rapeseed and Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  T. Shikanai,et al.  RNA editing in plant organelles: machinery, physiological function and evolution , 2006, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[19]  P. Maliga,et al.  Conservation of RNA editing between rice and maize plastids: are most editing events dispensable? , 2000, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[20]  H. Carrer,et al.  Site‐specific factor involved in the editing of the psbL mRNA in tobacco plastids. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[21]  Maureen R. Hanson,et al.  Sequence elements critical for efficient RNA editing of a tobacco chloroplast transcript in vivo and in vitro , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Maki Yukawa,et al.  A systematic search for RNA editing sites in pea chloroplasts: an editing event causes diversification from the evolutionarily conserved amino acid sequence. , 2004, Plant & cell physiology.

[23]  Hiro Iguchi,et al.  Chloroplast RNA Editing Required for Functional Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase in Plants* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  A. Brennicke,et al.  RNA editing in Arabidopsis mitochondria effects 441 C to U changes in ORFs. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Hanson,et al.  Substrate and cofactor requirements for RNA editing of chloroplast transcripts in Arabidopsis in vitro. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[26]  Frédérique Bitton,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Arabidopsis Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins Reveals Their Essential Role in Organelle Biogenesis , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[27]  Kazuo Shinozaki,et al.  Conserved domain structure of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins involved in chloroplast RNA editing , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  F. Zito,et al.  Mutations of cytochrome b6 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii disclose the functional significance for a proline to leucine conversion by petB editing in maize and tobacco , 2004, Plant Molecular Biology.