Social Metaphorical Mapping of the Concept of Force “CHI‐KA‐RA” in Japanese

This research focused on the concept of “force” (“CHI‐KA‐RA” in Japanese) in Newtonian mechanics. The primary objective was to develop a tool, based on metaphor, to interpret student thinking in learning scientific topics. The study provides an example of using the tool to trace the process of mutual changes in thinking during a dialog among students who have different perspectives on the same topic. “Social metaphorical mapping” was used to interpret a dialog between two groups of junior high school students with different epistemological paradigms with regard to the concept of force (CHI‐KA‐RA) in the learning environment of a computer simulation. Both source domains were recontextualized through social metaphorical mapping and the process of mutual changes in concepts was traced. Participants noticed that the Buridanian 1 concept of“force” differs from the Newtonian concept of “force,” differentiated between the concepts of “force” that use the same Japanese term “CHI‐KA‐RA,” and noticed that the Buridanian concept of “force” resembles the Newtonian concept of “momentum.”

[1]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[2]  R. Duit.  On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .

[3]  J. Clement.  Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[4]  D. Michael Watts.  A study of schoolchildren's alternative frameworks of the concept of force , 1983 .

[5]  David Hammer,et al.  Students' beliefs about conceptual knowledge in introductory physics , 1994 .

[6]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[7]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .

[8]  M. Black.  Models and metaphors : studies in language and philosophy , 1962 .

[9]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development , 1999 .

[10]  B. White.  ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[11]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning in science : the implications of children's science , 1985 .

[12]  D. Gentner,et al.  Cultural models in language and thought: How people construct mental models , 1987 .

[13]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Another reason that physics students learn by rote , 1999 .

[14]  G. Lakoff.  The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor , 1993 .

[15]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models in explanations, Part 1 : Horses for courses? , 1998 .

[16]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[17]  Emily H. van Zee,et al.  Reflective discourse: developing shared understandings in a physics classroom , 1997 .

[18]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[19]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Sources of Difficulty in Understanding Newtonian Dynamics , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[21]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Teaching Physics: Figuring out What Works , 1999 .

[22]  D. Laplane.  Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[23]  J. Roschelle.  Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[24]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[25]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Affordances of computers in teacher‐student interactions: The case of interactive physics™ , 1995 .

[26]  Lawrence B. Flick,et al.  Interaction of intuitive physics with computer‐simulated physics , 1990 .

[27]  Maher Z. Hashweh.  Toward an explanation of conceptual change , 1986 .

[28]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Unlearning Aristotelian Physics: A Study of Knowledge-Based Learning , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  John J. Clement,et al.  Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .

[31]  John J. Clement,et al.  Genius is not immune to persistent misconceptions: conceptual difficulties impeding Isaac Newton and contemporary physics students , 1990 .

[32]  David Hammer,et al.  Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching , 1997 .

[33]  I. Richards.  The Philosophy of Rhetoric , 1936 .

[34]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models in explanations, Part 2: Whose voice? Whose ears? , 1998 .

[35]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Using Questioning to Guide Student Thinking , 1997 .

[36]  Richard Steinberg.  Computers in teaching science: To simulate or not to simulate? , 2000 .

[37]  David Hammer,et al.  Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics , 1994 .

[38]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[39]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[40]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Knowledge in pieces : An evolving framework for understanding knowing and learning , 1988 .