Asymmetrical perceptions of partisan political bots

Political bots are social media algorithms that impersonate political actors and interact with other users, aiming to influence public opinion. This study investigates the ability to differentiate bots with partisan personas from humans on Twitter. Our online experiment (N = 656) explores how various characteristics of the participants and of the stimulus profiles bias recognition accuracy. The analysis reveals asymmetrical partisan-motivated reasoning, in that conservative profiles appear to be more confusing and Republican participants perform less well in the recognition task. Moreover, Republican users are more likely to confuse conservative bots with humans, whereas Democratic users are more likely to confuse conservative human users with bots. We discuss implications for how partisan identities affect motivated reasoning and how political bots exacerbate political polarization.

[1]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Actions, Intentions, and Self-Assessment: The Road to Self-Enhancement Is Paved with Good Intentions , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia,et al.  The spread of low-credibility content by social bots , 2017, Nature Communications.

[3]  Ryan Calo,et al.  Regulating Bot Speech , 2018 .

[4]  Robert Gorwa,et al.  Unpacking the Social Media Bot: A Typology to Guide Research and Policy , 2018, Policy & Internet.

[5]  Nicholas Diakopoulos,et al.  News Bots , 2016 .

[6]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The rise of social bots , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[7]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  How Trump Drove Coverage to the Nomination: Hybrid Media Campaigning , 2016 .

[8]  Samuel C. Woolley,et al.  Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics , 2016, First Monday.

[9]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  BotOrNot: A System to Evaluate Social Bots , 2016, WWW.

[10]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Deep Neural Networks for Bot Detection , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[11]  P. Metaxas,et al.  Social Media and the Elections , 2012, Science.

[12]  J. Busemeyer Decision making under uncertainty: a comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  D. Kahan Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study , 2012 .

[14]  V. Bakir,et al.  Fake News and The Economy of Emotions , 2018 .

[15]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[16]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion , 2014 .

[17]  Gang Wang,et al.  Man vs. Machine: Practical Adversarial Detection of Malicious Crowdsourcing Workers , 2014, USENIX Security Symposium.

[18]  M. Brewer The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[19]  S. Westwood,et al.  The Limits of Partisan Prejudice , 2017, The Journal of Politics.

[20]  D. Schunk,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation , 2002 .

[21]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Red Bots Do It Better:Comparative Analysis of Social Bot Partisan Behavior , 2019, WWW.

[22]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Attention to Television and Some Methods for Its Measurement , 1995 .

[23]  Jeremy Freese,et al.  The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples , 2016 .

[24]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Konstantin Beznosov,et al.  The socialbot network: when bots socialize for fame and money , 2011, ACSAC '11.

[26]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[27]  Konstantin Beznosov,et al.  Design and analysis of a social botnet , 2013, Comput. Networks.

[28]  C. D. Vreese,et al.  Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects , 2010 .

[29]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Linguistic Cues to Deception: Identifying Political Trolls on Social Media , 2019, ICWSM.

[30]  Lilach Nir,et al.  Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion Perception , 2011 .

[31]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on Twitter , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[33]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion , 2016, First Monday.

[35]  Kate Starbird,et al.  Disinformation’s spread: bots, trolls and all of us , 2019, Nature.

[36]  D. Lazer,et al.  Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election , 2019, Science.

[37]  Lang Annie,et al.  Attention, Resource Allocation, and Communication Research: What Do Secondary Task Reaction Times Measure, Anyway? , 1998 .

[38]  Taylor W. Brown,et al.  Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[40]  Maurizio Tesconi,et al.  RTbust: Exploiting Temporal Patterns for Botnet Detection on Twitter , 2019, WebSci.

[41]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media , 2011, ICWSM.

[42]  Taha Yasseri,et al.  Even good bots fight: The case of Wikipedia , 2016, PloS one.

[43]  Markus Strohmaier,et al.  When Social Bots Attack: Modeling Susceptibility of Users in Online Social Networks , 2012, #MSM.

[44]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  Predicting susceptibility to social bots on Twitter , 2013, 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration (IRI).

[45]  David P. Redlawsk Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[46]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Anatomy of an online misinformation network , 2018, PloS one.

[47]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  Alan Richardson-Klavehn,et al.  Recognition memory and decision processes: A meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responses , 2002, Memory.

[49]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Analyzing the Digital Traces of Political Manipulation: The 2016 Russian Interference Twitter Campaign , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[50]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots , 2019, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.