Effects of posture, weight and frequency on trunk muscular activity and fatigue during repetitive lifting tasks.

We examined the effects of posture, weight and frequency on trunk muscular activity and fatigue during repetitive dynamic lifting. Electromyographic (EMG) signals from eight primary trunk muscles were collected during 120 min for four different task conditions. The patterns of muscle recruitment and the levels of relative activation were analysed using the normalized EMG data. Median power frequency (MPF) shift patterns were analysed to examine muscular fatigue. The muscles in the dorsal part of the trunk were activated at the symmetric posture, while the muscles on the contralateral side to the workload were more strongly activated at the asymmetric posture. Decreasing trends of MPFs were found in some active muscles, and they were more pronounced for the asymmetric posture than for the symmetric posture. It was also seen that the muscles became fatigued faster for the light load-high frequency task than for the heavy load-low frequency task.

[1]  W S Marras,et al.  Temporal Patterns of Trunk Muscle Activity throughout a Dynamic, Asymmetric Lifting Motion , 1992, Human factors.

[2]  G A Mirka,et al.  The quantification of EMG normalization error. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[3]  M. M. Ayoub,et al.  Problems and solutions in manual materials handling: the state of the art , 1992 .

[4]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[5]  D. Chaffin,et al.  A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing. , 1974, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[6]  K Ohlsson,et al.  Electromyographic fatigue in neck/shoulder muscles and endurance in women with repetitive work. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[7]  M.H. Pope,et al.  The design and use of a microcomputerized real-time muscle fatigue monitor based on the medical frequency shift in the electromyographic signal , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  S Kumar,et al.  Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[9]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Spectral analysis of erector spinae EMG during intermittent isometric fatiguing exercise. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[10]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Biomechanical modelling of the low back during load lifting. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[11]  Gustav Caffier,et al.  Surface EMG and load level during long-lasting static contractions of low intensity , 1993 .

[12]  W S Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: I. Model Structure , 1991, Human factors.

[13]  A Forster,et al.  Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity, mean power frequency, and mean EMG voltage during prolonged submaximal contractions , 1989, Muscle & nerve.

[14]  William S. Marras,et al.  Trunk motion during lifting: The relative cost , 1986 .

[15]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  Muscle Fatigue Monitor (MFM): Second Generation , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  S. McGill.  A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  Muscle Fatigue Monitor: A Noninvasive Device for Observing Localized Muscular Fatigue , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Steven A. Lavender,et al.  Coactivation of the Trunk Muscles during Asymmetric Loading of the Torso , 1992, Human factors.