Steady State Groundwater Flow Simulation With Imprecise Parameters

A methodology based on fuzzy set theory is developed to incorporate imprecise parameters into steady state groundwater flow models. In this case, fuzzy numbers are used to represent parameter imprecision. As such, they are also used as a measure for the uncertainty associated with the hydraulic heads due to the imprecision in the input parameters. The imprecise input parameters may come from indirect measurements, subjective interpretation, and expert judgment of available information. In the methodology, a finite difference method is combined with level set operations to formulate the fuzzy groundwater flow model. This fuzzy modeling technique can handle imprecise parameters in a direct way without generating a large number of realizations. Two numerical solution methods are used to solve the fuzzy groundwater flow model: the groundwater model operator method proposed in this methodology and the iterative algorithm based on conventional interval arithmetics. The iterative method is simple but may overestimate the uncertainty of hydraulic heads. The groundwater model operator method not only provides the hull of the solution set for the hydraulic heads but also considers the dependence of hydraulic head coefficients which are functions of imprecise parameters. Sensitivity analysis shows that the dependence of hydraulic head coefficients has a critical impact on the model results, and neglecting this dependence may result in significant overestimation of the uncertainty of hydraulic heads. A numerical model based on the methodology is tested by comparing it with the analytical solution for a homogeneous radial flow problem. It is also applied to a simplified two-dimensional heterogeneous flow case to demonstrate the methodology.

[1]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[2]  R. Freeze A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of one‐dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media , 1975 .

[3]  J. R. Macmillan,et al.  Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows: 2. Evaluation and application , 1978 .

[4]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows: 1. Comparison of one‐ and three‐dimensional flows , 1978 .

[5]  Analysis of mass transport with uncertain physical parameters , 1979 .

[6]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in a stratified aquifer , 1979 .

[7]  Ramon E. Moore Methods and applications of interval analysis , 1979, SIAM studies in applied mathematics.

[8]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain: 2. Two‐dimensional simulations , 1979 .

[9]  J. P. Delhomme,et al.  Spatial variability and uncertainty in groundwater flow parameters: A geostatistical approach , 1979 .

[10]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[11]  C. L. Winter,et al.  A Perturbation Expansion for Diffusion in a Random Velocity Field , 1984 .

[12]  Arnold Neumaier,et al.  Linear Interval Equations , 1986, Interval Mathematics.

[13]  P. Kitanidis Parameter Uncertainty in Estimation of Spatial Functions: Bayesian Analysis , 1986 .

[14]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  Constrained interpolation and qualitative information—The soft kriging approach , 1986 .

[15]  Lynn W. Gelhar,et al.  Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications , 1986 .

[16]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Multi Criteria Decision Making in Crisp and Fuzzy Environments , 1986 .

[17]  A. Kaufmann,et al.  Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : theory and applications , 1986 .

[18]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Stochastic theory of field‐scale fickian dispersion in anisotropic porous media , 1987 .

[19]  S. Chanas,et al.  Single value simulation of fuzzy variables , 1988 .

[20]  W. E. Kelly,et al.  Imprecise (fuzzy) information in geostatistics , 1988 .

[21]  Li Liu,et al.  State-of-the-art in nonlinear optimization software for the microcomputer , 1989, Comput. Oper. Res..

[22]  J. Evans,et al.  Assessing the value of hydrogeologic information for risk‐based remedial action decisions , 1989 .

[23]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Reliable aquifer remediation in the presence of spatially variable hydraulic conductivity: From data to design , 1989 .

[24]  Uncertainty in Environmental Risk Analysis , 1989 .

[25]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Kriging with imprecise (fuzzy) variograms. I: Theory , 1990 .

[26]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Kriging with imprecise (fuzzy) variograms. II: Application , 1990 .

[27]  Joel Massmann,et al.  Hydrogeological Decision Analysis: 1. A Framework , 1990 .

[28]  A. Neumaier Interval methods for systems of equations , 1990 .

[29]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Evaluation of uncertainties in a three-dimensional groundwater contamination plume , 1992 .

[30]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Eulerian‐Lagrangian Theory of transport in space‐time nonstationary velocity fields: Exact nonlocal formalism by conditional moments and weak approximation , 1993 .

[31]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Prediction of steady state flow in nonuniform geologic media by conditional moments: Exact nonlocal , 1993 .

[32]  Y. W. Lee,et al.  FUZZY DECISION MAKING IN GROUND WATER NITRATE RISK MANAGEMENT , 1994 .

[33]  J. J. Gómez-Hernández,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of travel times in groundwater modeling , 1994 .

[34]  N. Shafike,et al.  Groundwater flow simulations and management under imprecise parameters , 1994 .