A study of a single robot interacting with groups of children in a rotation game scenario

We tested the hypothesis that children are more attentive to a robot if the robot appears to be interested in the children. In addition, we investigated if and how the quality and quantity of a child's attentive behaviour varies with the distance to the robot, reflecting the notion of "social spaces". Hereto, 16 groups of up to 10 children each were engaged in a play scenario in which they had to move closer to a robot over 6 successive rounds. The robot was endowed with a "camera eye" and an arm and hand. The camera could either be nonmoving ("static") or actively "searching" ("active searching"), giving the impression it was trying to select a child to focus on. Likewise, the arm and hand could either be fixed in a permanent pointing position ("permanent pointing") or actively rise to point selectively at a particular child when it stopped facing it ("selective pointing"). The results showed that: 1) the mean frequency of overall attentive behaviour by the children (including attention towards other children) was significantly higher when the robot was not selectively pointing at the children and independent of the state of the camera; 2) "looking at" was the most frequently scored attentive activity for the children and was mainly targeted to the robot, but not correlated with any of their other attentive activities; 3) there was an interaction effect between the state of the camera and of the pointer: looking at the robot by the children occurred significantly more often when the camera and the arm were consistent in signaling apparent interest (i.e. camera "active searching" and hand "selectively pointing" or camera "static" and hand "permanently pointing"); and 4) there was no demonstrable effect of distance to the robot on the overall attentive behaviour of the children.

[1]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[3]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Body Movement Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction , 2003, IJCAI.

[4]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction, and the Human in the Loop , 1998, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[5]  Donald A. Norman How People Might Interact with Agents , 1997 .

[6]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  How might people interact with agents , 1994, CACM.

[7]  Thomas Erickson Designing agents as if people mattered , 1997 .

[8]  E. Hall,et al.  Proxemics [and Comments and Replies] , 1968, Current Anthropology.

[9]  Sotaro Kita,et al.  Pointing: A foundational building block in human communication , 2003 .

[10]  Hong Hong,et al.  Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  The design space of robots: investigating children's views , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[12]  Sotaro Kita,et al.  Interplay of gaze, hand, torso orientation and language in pointing , 2003 .

[13]  K. Dautenhahn Robots we like to live with?! - a developmental perspective on a personalized, life-long robot companion , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[14]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  A quantitative technique for analysing robot-human interactions , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Cooperation with a robotic assistant , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  B. Robins,et al.  Investigating autistic children's attitudes towards strangers with the theatrical robot - a new experimental paradigm in human-robot interaction studies , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[17]  D. Christopher Dryer,et al.  Getting Personal with Computers: How to Design Personalities for Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[18]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  From embodied to socially embedded agents – Implications for interaction-aware robots , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[19]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  An introduction to software agents , 1997 .

[20]  E. Hall The hidden dimension: an anthropologist examines man's use of space in public and private , 1969 .

[21]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Caring for agents and agents that care: building empathic relations with synthetic agents , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[22]  M. Scopelliti,et al.  If I had a Robot at Home... Peoples’ Representation of Domestic Robots , 2004 .