BIM as Infrastructure in a Finnish HVAC Actor Network: Enabling Adoption, Reuse, and Recombination over a Building Life Cycle and between Projects

AbstractThis paper investigates how sociotechnical actions such as adoption, reuse, and recombination of designs and processes enable the users of building information modeling (BIM) tools to not only achieve productivity improvements in particular activities, but to build system capability that enables new ways of working. The evolution of BIM as digital infrastructure is studied in a network of companies developing and using BIM tools for new ways of working in the Finnish HVAC industry. The research methodology is a deductive case study testing a theoretical framework derived from the literature. The main finding is that BIM has emerged as digital infrastructure in design and construction, while development has stalled in use and operations. The explanation for the successful outcome in design and construction is found in the evidence of three sociotechnical actions of adoption, reuse, and recombination activating self-reinforcing positive developments in design and construction. The stalled developmen...

[1]  Mohsen Attaran,et al.  Information technology and business-process redesign , 2003, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[2]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[3]  R. Larsson.  Case Survey Methodology: Quantitative Analysis of Patterns Across Case Studies , 1993 .

[4]  Vishal Singh,et al.  BIM adoption : expectations across disciplines , 2010 .

[5]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Coordination and control in project‐based work: digital objects and infrastructures for delivery , 2010 .

[6]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[7]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Collaboration Environments for Construction: Implementation Case Studies , 2008 .

[8]  Coren Sharples.  Unified Frontiers: Reaching Out with BIM , 2009 .

[9]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution , 2013, MIS Q..

[10]  Brittany Giel.  Return on Investment Analysis of Building Information Modeling in Construction , 2009 .

[11]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Evidence-Based Management: Concept Cleanup Time? , 2009 .

[12]  Amory B. Lovins,et al.  Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution , 2017 .

[13]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Paradigm Trajectories of Building Information Modeling Practice in Project Networks , 2009 .

[14]  Kamal Golabi,et al.  A Statewide Pavement Management System , 1982 .

[15]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[16]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Benefits and lessons learned of implementing building virtual design and construction (VDC) technologies for coordination of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems on a large healthcare project , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[17]  Peter Beck.  The AEC Dilemma—Exploring the Barriers To Change , 2001 .

[18]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  A Coordination Theory Approach to Organizational Process Design , 1997 .

[19]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[20]  R. Stake.  Qualitative Case Studies. , 2005 .

[21]  J. Schumpeter.  The Creative Response in Economic History , 1947, The Journal of Economic History.

[22]  Kerry London,et al.  Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry , 2010 .

[23]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Dominic Holzer,et al.  ARE YOU TALKING TO ME? WHY BIM ALONE IS NOT THE ANSWER , 2007 .

[25]  Peter A. Bullen.  Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings , 2007 .

[26]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Instance-Informed Information Systems: A Pre-requisite for Energy-Efficient and Green Information Systems , 2011, MobiQuitous.

[27]  James M. Wilson.  A comparison of the ‘American System of Manufactures’ circa 1850 with Just in Time methods , 1998 .

[28]  Nelson P. Repenning,et al.  Capability Traps and Self-Confirming Attribution Errors in the Dynamics of Process Improvement , 2002 .

[29]  Mei Li,et al.  Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications , 2011 .

[30]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Developing Design Propositions through Research Synthesis , 2008 .

[31]  Hannele Kerosuo,et al.  An activity theoretical approach to BIM-research , 2012 .

[32]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry , 2011 .

[33]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[35]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[36]  W. Arthur.  Positive feedbacks in the economy , 1990 .

[37]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform , 2011 .

[38]  Patrick C. Suermann.  Evaluating The Impact Of Building Information Modeling (BIM) On Construction , 2009 .

[39]  John Haymaker,et al.  Relationships Between Project Complexity and Communication , 2011 .

[40]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign , 2011 .

[41]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Dynamics of inter‐organizational knowledge creation and information technology use across object worlds: the case of an innovative construction project , 2010 .

[42]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation , 2002 .

[43]  Karen Manley,et al.  Key influences on construction innovation , 2004 .

[44]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[45]  A. Tukker.  Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet , 2004 .

[46]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Guest editorial: Five steps towards exploring the future of operations management , 2012 .

[47]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Sustainable PLM through Intelligent Products , 2013, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[48]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..