Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture

We present a new physics informed neural network (PINN) algorithm for solving brittle fracture problems. While most of the PINN algorithms available in the literature minimize the residual of the governing partial differential equation, the proposed approach takes a different path by minimizing the variational energy of the system. Additionally, we modify the neural network output such that the boundary conditions associated with the problem are exactly satisfied. Compared to conventional residual based PINN, the proposed approach has two major advantages. First, the imposition of boundary conditions is relatively simpler and more robust. Second, the order of derivatives present in the functional form of the variational energy is of lower order than in the residual form. Hence, training the network is faster. To compute the total variational energy of the system, an efficient scheme that takes as input a geometry described by spline based CAD model and employs Gauss quadrature rules for numerical integration has been proposed. Moreover, we utilize the concept of transfer learning to obtain the crack path in an efficient manner. The proposed approach is used to solve four fracture mechanics problems. For all the examples, results obtained using the proposed approach match closely with the results available in the literature. For the first two examples, we compare the results obtained using the proposed approach with the conventional residual based neural network results. For both the problems, the proposed approach is found to yield better accuracy compared to conventional residual based PINN algorithms.

[1]  Nicholas Geneva,et al.  Modeling the Dynamics of PDE Systems with Physics-Constrained Deep Auto-Regressive Networks , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  K. Pereira,et al.  Fretting fatigue lifetime estimation using a cyclic cohesive zone model , 2020 .

[3]  H. Tran-Ngoc,et al.  An efficient artificial neural network for damage detection in bridges and beam-like structures by improving training parameters using cuckoo search algorithm , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[4]  Jitesh H. Panchal,et al.  Simulator-free solution of high-dimensional stochastic elliptic partial differential equations using deep neural networks , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  Martín Abadi,et al.  TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems , 2016, ArXiv.

[6]  Christian Miehe,et al.  Thermodynamically consistent phase‐field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi‐field FE implementations , 2010 .

[7]  Christian Miehe,et al.  A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits , 2010 .

[8]  George E. Karniadakis,et al.  Hidden Fluid Mechanics: A Navier-Stokes Informed Deep Learning Framework for Assimilating Flow Visualization Data , 2018, ArXiv.

[9]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[10]  B. Bourdin,et al.  Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture , 2000 .

[11]  Ratna Kumar Annabattula,et al.  A FEniCS implementation of the phase field method for quasi-static brittle fracture , 2018, Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering.

[12]  Magd Abdel Wahab,et al.  Numerical prediction of fretting fatigue crack trajectory in a railway axle using XFEM , 2017 .

[13]  Raúl Rojas,et al.  Neural Networks - A Systematic Introduction , 1996 .

[14]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Phase-field models for brittle and cohesive fracture , 2014 .

[15]  Paris Perdikaris,et al.  Physics-Constrained Deep Learning for High-dimensional Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification without Labeled Data , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Anthony Gravouil,et al.  2D and 3D Abaqus implementation of a robust staggered phase-field solution for modeling brittle fracture , 2017 .

[17]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[18]  Yao Fu,et al.  Bridging the multi phase-field and molecular dynamics models for the solidification of nano-crystals , 2016, J. Comput. Sci..

[19]  Dominik Schillinger,et al.  Isogeometric collocation for phase-field fracture models , 2015 .

[20]  L. Piegl,et al.  The NURBS Book , 1995, Monographs in Visual Communications.

[21]  T. Rabczuk,et al.  Phase field simulations of coupled microstructure solidification problems via the strong form particle difference method , 2017, International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design.

[22]  N. Monteiro Azevedo,et al.  Hybrid discrete element/finite element method for fracture analysis , 2006 .

[23]  A. A. Griffith The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids , 1921 .

[24]  Barry D. Davidson,et al.  A Direct Energy Balance Approach for Determining Energy Release Rates in Three and Four Point Bend End Notched Flexure Tests , 2005 .

[25]  Samir Khatir,et al.  Fast simulations for solving fracture mechanics inverse problems using POD-RBF XIGA and Jaya algorithm , 2019, Engineering Fracture Mechanics.

[26]  Jiansong Deng,et al.  Polynomial splines over hierarchical T-meshes , 2008, Graph. Model..

[27]  Paris Perdikaris,et al.  Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations , 2017, ArXiv.

[28]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  A higher-order phase-field model for brittle fracture: Formulation and analysis within the isogeometric analysis framework , 2014 .

[29]  Paris Perdikaris,et al.  Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[30]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  A primal-dual active set method and predictor-corrector mesh adaptivity for computing fracture propagation using a phase-field approach , 2015 .

[31]  Maziar Raissi,et al.  Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations , 2018, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[32]  N. A. Bhatti,et al.  Prediction of fretting fatigue crack initiation location and direction using cohesive zone model , 2018, Tribology International.

[33]  E Weinan,et al.  The Deep Ritz Method: A Deep Learning-Based Numerical Algorithm for Solving Variational Problems , 2017, Communications in Mathematics and Statistics.

[34]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .

[35]  Yun-Lai Zhou,et al.  Damage detection using vibration data and dynamic transmissibility ensemble with auto-associative neural network , 2017 .

[36]  G. Molnár,et al.  Abaqus implementation of a robust staggered phase-fi eld solution for modeling brittle fracture , 2017 .

[37]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture , 2012 .

[38]  Paris Perdikaris,et al.  Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part II): Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations , 2017, ArXiv.

[39]  Paul A. Wawrzynek,et al.  Quasi-automatic simulation of crack propagation for 2D LEFM problems , 1996 .

[40]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  Adaptive phase field analysis with dual hierarchical meshes for brittle fracture , 2019, Engineering Fracture Mechanics.