Progress towards an automated trainable pollen location and classifier system for use in the palynology laboratory

Abstract Palynological analysis, as applied in vegetation reconstruction, climate change studies, allergy research, melissopalynology and forensic science, is a slow, laborious process. Here, we present an ongoing project aimed at the realisation of a low-cost, automatic, trainable system for the location, recognition and counting of pollen on standard glass microscope slides. This system is designed to dramatically reduce the time that the palynologist must spend at the microscope, thus considerably increasing productivity in the pollen lab. The system employs robotics, image processing and neural network technology to locate, photograph and classify pollen on a conventionally prepared pollen slide. After locating pollen grains on a microscope slide, it captures images of them. The individual images of the pollen are then analysed using a set of mathematically defined features. These feature sets are then classified by the system by comparison with feature sets previously obtained from the analysis of images of known pollen types. The classified images are then presented to the palynologist for checking. This ability for post-classification checking is a key part of the automated palynology process, as it is likely that under the current technology, it will be very difficult to produce an automated pollen counting and classifier system that is 100% correct 100% of the time. However, it is important to remember that pollen counts performed by human palynologists are seldom 100% correct 100% of the time as well. The system has been tested on slides containing fresh pollen of six different species. The slides were counted repeatedly by both the system and by human palynologists. The results of these tests show that the machine can produce counts with very similar proportions to human palynologists (typically within 1–4%). Although the means of the machine counts were usually slightly lower than those of the human counts, the variance was also lower, demonstrating that the machine counts pollen more consistently than human palynologists. The system described herein should be viewed as a potentially very valuable tool in the palynological laboratory. Its ability to discriminate between the bulk of pollen and debris on a slide and capture and store images of each pollen grain is in itself a very useful feature. This capability combined with the relatively positive results from this first all-of-system capture-and-classify test clearly demonstrate the potential of the system to considerably improve the efficiency of palynological analysis. However, more tests are required before the extent of the system's potential can be fully realised. The next step, testing the system on fossil pollen samples, is now underway.

[1]  E. C. Stillman,et al.  The needs and prospects for automation in palynology , 1996 .

[2]  D Walker,et al.  Purpose and method in Quaternary palynology , 1990 .

[3]  O. Ronneberger,et al.  Automated pollen recognition using 3D volume images from fluorescence microscopy , 2002 .

[4]  H. J. L. Witte Preliminary research into possibilities of automated pollen counting , 1988 .

[5]  B. Stoel,et al.  Feasibility study on automated recognition of allergenic pollen: grass, birch and mugwort , 2006 .

[6]  J. R. Flenley,et al.  Towards automation of palynology 3: pollen pattern recognition using Gabor transforms and digital moments , 2004 .

[7]  Ping Li,et al.  Pollen texture identification using neural networks , 1999 .

[8]  A.W.G. Duller,et al.  A new approach to automated pollen analysis , 2000 .

[9]  R. M. Hodgson,et al.  The use of problem knowledge to improve the robustness of a fuzzy neural network , 2000, Neural Networks for Signal Processing X. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop (Cat. No.00TH8501).

[10]  R. M. Hodgson,et al.  Initialising neural networks with a priori problem knowledge , 2000, Neural Networks for Signal Processing X. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop (Cat. No.00TH8501).

[11]  Suann Yang,et al.  Counting pollen grains using readily available, free image processing and analysis software. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[12]  Johan H C Reiber,et al.  Detection of pollen grains in multifocal optical microscopy images of air samples , 2009, Microscopy research and technique.

[13]  Robert M. Hodgson,et al.  The Development of Mapping Techniques to Incorporate Image Processing Problem Specific Rules into Neural Networks , 1998, IVCNZ.

[14]  J. R. Flenley,et al.  Towards automation of palynology 1: analysis of pollen shape and ornamentation using simple geometric measures, derived from scanning electron microscope images , 2004 .

[15]  M.,et al.  Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture , 2022 .

[16]  K. Miyamoto,et al.  Measurement of the amount and number of pollen particles of Cryptomeria japonica (Taxodiaceae) by imaging with a photoacoustic microscope , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  Monique Thonnat,et al.  Development of a semi-automatic system for pollen recognition , 2002 .

[18]  John Flenley,et al.  Some prospects for lake sediment analysis in the 21st century , 2003 .

[19]  皆川 泰代,et al.  2010年度若手研究成果報告会(2月8-9日 三田キャンパス東館6階G-SECLab) , 2011 .

[20]  J. Shulmeister,et al.  New Zealand chironomids as proxies for human-induced and natural environmental change: Transfer functions for temperature and lake production (chlorophyll a) , 2006 .

[21]  Gary Allen,et al.  An automated pollen recognition system : a thesis submitted to Massey University, Turitea, Palmerston North, New Zealand in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering , 2008 .

[22]  G. E. Taylor,et al.  Computerized identification of pollen grains by texture analysis , 1990 .

[23]  E. Cernadas,et al.  Computer-aided identification of allergenic species of Urticaceae pollen , 2004 .

[24]  K. Faegri,et al.  Textbook of Pollen Analysis , 1965 .

[25]  Lionel Carter,et al.  Towards a climate event stratigraphy for New Zealand over the past 30 000 years (NZ‐INTIMATE project) , 2007 .

[26]  R.M. Hodgson,et al.  Machine vision for automated optical recognition and classification of pollen grains or other singulated microscopic objects , 2008, 2008 15th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice.

[27]  Pilar Carrión,et al.  Determine the Composition of Honeybee Pollen by Texture Classification , 2003, IbPRIA.

[28]  J. Flenley,et al.  Progress towards a system for the automatic recognition of pollen using light microscope images , 2005, ISPA 2005. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, 2005..

[29]  J. R. Flenley,et al.  Towards automation of palynology 2: the use of texture measures and neural network analysis for automated identification of optical images of pollen grains , 2004 .

[30]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Automatic recognition of biological particles in microscopic images , 2007, Pattern Recognit. Lett..