CLADISTICS: WHAT'S IN A WORD?

Abstract— Cladistics has changed considerably with the availability of new methods and sources of data, and the increasing realization that cladograms are relevant to all manner of historical questions. Criticisms of, and justifications for, consensus hypotheses in phylogenetic inference are reviewed. The conclusion is overwhelmingly against taxonomic congruence which deliberately seeks consensus propositions. The total evidence approach is not so burdened. A preference for suboptimal cladograms is also critized, as is the protocol for mapping characters of special interest onto a phylogenetic hypothesis derived from other evidence. The bootstrap and jackknife resampling techniques are questioned because their underlying assumptions are violated and they are sensitive to character frequencies. These findings suggest that cladistics is being redefined in ways that contradict the practices and principles responsible for its pre‐eminence in phylogenetic inference.

[1]  J. Farris The Efficient Diagnoses of the Phylogenetie System , 1980 .

[2]  J. Farris,et al.  Parsimony, Synapomorphy, and Explanatory Power: A Reply to Duncan , 1985 .

[3]  A. Tehler,et al.  CONSENSUS TREES, A NECESSITY IN TAXONOMIC PRACTICE , 1990, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[4]  W. Maddison RECONSTRUCTING CHARACTER EVOLUTION ON POLYTOMOUS CLADOGRAMS , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[5]  James M. Clark,et al.  When Molecules and Morphology Clash: A Phylogenetic Analysis of the North American Ambystomatid Salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae) , 1991 .

[6]  Alec L. Panchen,et al.  Classification, evolution, and the nature of biology: Author index , 1992 .

[7]  J. Felsenstein CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  N. Platnick,et al.  THREE‐TAXON STATEMENTS: A MORE PRECISE USE OF PARSIMONY? , 1991 .

[9]  J. Coddington CLADISTIC TESTS OF ADAPTATIONAL HYPOTHESES , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[10]  J. Farris,et al.  Synapomorphy, parsimony, and evidence , 1986 .

[11]  M. F. Mickevich Taxonomic Congruence: Rohlf and Sokal's Misunderstanding , 1980 .

[12]  J. Farris,et al.  A Botanical Clique@@@Cladistics and Plant Systematics. , 1979 .

[13]  D. Brooks Macroevolutionary Comparisons Of Host And Parpsite Phylogenies , 1988 .

[14]  A. Kluge Cladistics and the Classification of the Great Apes , 1983 .

[15]  C. Bult,et al.  SKEWNESS AND PERMUTATION , 1992, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[16]  Michael J Sanderson,et al.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: THE BOOTSTRAP REVISITED , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[17]  James S. Farris,et al.  The Information Content of the Phylogenetic System , 1979 .

[18]  J. Farris A Successive Approximations Approach to Character Weighting , 1969 .

[19]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  PHENETIC TAXONOMY: Theory and Methods , 1986 .

[20]  Pablo A. Goloboff,et al.  RANDOM DATA, HOMOPLASY AND INFORMATION , 1991 .

[21]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  COULD A CLADOGRAM THIS SHORT HAVE ARISEN BY CHANCE ALONE?: ON PERMUTATION TESTS FOR CLADISTIC STRUCTURE , 1991 .

[22]  F. Rohlf Consensus indices for comparing classifications , 1982 .

[23]  A. Kluge A Concern for Evidence and a Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes) , 1989 .

[24]  M. Donoghue,et al.  PATTERNS OF VARIATION IN LEVELS OF HOMOPLASY , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  G. Nelson,et al.  Why Crusade against Consensus? A Reply to Barrett, Donoghue, and Sober , 1993 .

[26]  D. H. Colless,et al.  Predictivity and Stability in Classifications: some Comments on Recent Studies , 1981 .

[27]  A. Kluge THREE‐TAXON TRANSFORMATION IN PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE: AMBIGUITY AND DISTORTION AS REGARDS EXPLANATORY POWER , 1993 .

[28]  M. Miyamoto,et al.  CONSENSUS CLADOGRAMS AND GENERAL CLASSIFICATIONS , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[29]  J. Farris The Hypothesis of Nonspecificity and Taxonomic Congruence , 1971 .

[30]  J. Farris Simplicity and informativeness in systematics and phylogeny , 1982 .

[31]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. , 1988, Annual review of genetics.

[32]  James W. Archie,et al.  A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data , 1989 .

[33]  J. Farris THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[34]  J. Farris DISTANCE DATA REVISITED , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[35]  A. Kluge,et al.  Comparative morphology of the inner ear in salamanders (Caudata, Amphibia) , 1978 .

[36]  D. Hillis,et al.  Molecular Versus Morphological Approaches to Systematics , 1987 .

[37]  A. Kluge Species as historical individuals , 1990 .

[38]  Gerald R. Smith Introgression in fishes : significance for paleontology, cladistics, and evolutionary rates , 1992 .

[39]  W. Brown,et al.  Heteroplasmy suggests limited biparental inheritance of Mytilus mitochondrial DNA. , 1991, Science.

[40]  Elliott Sober,et al.  Crusade? A Reply to Nelson , 1993 .

[41]  M. Pagel,et al.  Recent Developments in the Analysis of Comparative Data , 1988, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[42]  J. Farris EXCESS HOMOPLASY RATIOS , 1991 .

[43]  J. Carpenter Choosing Among Multiple Equally Parsimonious Cladograms , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[44]  S. Hedges The number of replications needed for accurate estimation of the bootstrap P value in phylogenetic studies. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.

[45]  Gareth Nelson,et al.  Cladistic Analysis and Synthesis: Principles and Definitions, with a Historical Note on Adanson's Familles Des Plantes (1763–1764) , 1979 .

[46]  M. F. Michevich Transformation Series Analysis , 1982 .

[47]  L. Werdelin WE ARE NOT OUT OF THE WOODS YET— A report from a Nobel Symposium , 1989 .

[48]  J. Farris,et al.  Methods for Investigating Taxonomie Congruence and their Application to the Leptopodomorpha , 1981 .

[49]  J. Farris,et al.  The implications of congruence in Menidia , 1981 .

[50]  E. Bermingham,et al.  Molecular zoogeography of freshwater fishes in the southeastern United States. , 1986, Genetics.

[51]  J. Farris THE PATTERN OF CLADISTICS , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.