Comparison of Shear-Wave Slowness Profiles at 10 Strong-Motion Sites from Noninvasive SASW Measurements and Measurements Made in Boreholes

The spectral-analysis-of-surface-waves (SASW) method is a relatively new in situ method for determining shear-wave slownesses. All measurements are made on the ground surface, making it much less costly than methods that require boreholes. The SASW method uses a number of active sources (ranging from a commercial Vibroseis truck to a small handheld hammer for the study conducted here) and different receiver spacings to map a curve of apparent phase velocity versus frequency. With the simplifying assumption that the phase velocities correspond to fundamental mode surface waves, forward modeling yields an estimate of the subsurface shear-wave slownesses. To establish the reliability of this indirect technique, we conducted a blind evaluation of the SASW method. SASW testing was performed at 10 strong-motion stations at which borehole seismic measurements were previously or subsequently made; if previously made, the borehole results were not used for the interpretation of the SASW data, and vice-versa. Comparisons of the shear-wave slownesses from the SASW and borehole measurements are generally very good. The differences in predicted ground-motion amplifications are less than about 15% for most frequencies. In addition, both methods gave the same NEHRP site classification for seven of the sites. For the other three sites the average velocities from the downhole measurements were only 5-13 m/sec larger than the velocity defining the class C/D boundary. This study demonstrates that in many situations the SASW method can provide subsurface information suitable for site response predictions. Manuscript received 18 January 2002.

[1]  D. Boore,et al.  Borehole P- and S-wave velocity at thirteen stations in Southern California , 2001 .

[2]  David M. Boore,et al.  Seismic velocities and geological conditions at twelve sites subjected to strong ground motion in the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake; a revision of OFR 96-740 , 1999 .

[3]  David M. Boore,et al.  Comparing Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles From Inversion of Surface-Wave Phase Velocities with Downhole Measurements: Systematic Differences Between the CXW Method and Downhole Measurements at Six USC Strong-Motion Sites , 1998 .

[4]  David M. Boore,et al.  Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method , 2003 .

[5]  Masanori Horike,et al.  INVERSION OF PHASE VELOCITY OF LONG-PERIOD MICROTREMORS TO THE S-WAVE-VELOCITY STRUCTURE DOWN TO THE BASEMENT IN URBANIZED AREAS , 1985 .

[6]  Soheil Nazarian,et al.  In situ seismic testing with surface waves , 1989 .

[7]  J. F. Gibbs Near-surface P- and S-wave velocities from borehole measurements near Lake Hemet, California , 1989 .

[8]  David M. Boore,et al.  Site amplifications for generic rock sites , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  William A. Bryant,et al.  A Site-Conditions Map for California Based on Geology and Shear-Wave Velocity , 2000 .

[10]  Daren Joseph Zywicki,et al.  Advanced signal processing methods applied to engineering analysis of seismic surface waves , 1999 .

[11]  David M. Boore,et al.  Borehole velocity measurements and geological conditions at thirteen sites in the Los Angeles, California region , 2000 .

[12]  W R Hudson,et al.  DETERMINATION OF IN SITU SHEAR WAVE VELOCITIES FROM SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES , 1982 .