Self-assessment: A critical competence for Industrial Engineering

Assess one's own abilities realistically and critically is the key for a continuous adaptation to the changing labor market conditions. The university system must train the future engineers to rate their own performance accurately, reducing biases as self-benevolence. This paper analyzes, with a sample of students of Industrial Engineering, the accuracy of self-assessment in oral presentations, using a scoring rubric. The results of several statistical tests indicate that students are good assessors of others work, but benevolent with their own work. In addition, men evaluate themselves significantly higher than women do. Finally, self-assessment tend to compensate for others assessments, mainly in the case of students considered worse by teachers. These results point to the need of including self-assessment activities in an increasing number to improve students’ performance.

[1]  T. Blackwood Business undergraduates' knowledge monitoring accuracy: how much do they know about how much they know? , 2013 .

[2]  Steven Beyerlein,et al.  Assessment Framework For Capstone Design Courses , 2006 .

[3]  J. H. McMillan Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment , 2013 .

[4]  Daniel L. Dinsmore,et al.  What are confidence judgments made of? Students' explanations for their confidence ratings and what that means for calibration , 2013 .

[5]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[6]  Martin Valcke,et al.  How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments? , 2012 .

[7]  Gavin T. L. Brown Student self-assessment , 2013 .

[8]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Peer versus Self Assessment of Oral Business Presentation Performance , 2001 .

[9]  David Boud,et al.  Reframing assessment as if learning were important , 2007 .

[10]  Fabian Fagerholm,et al.  Peer Assessment in Experiential Learning , 2022 .

[11]  Kam-por Kwan,et al.  Tutor Versus Peer Group Assessment of Student Performance in a Simulation Training Exercise , 1996 .

[12]  Juan A. Marin-Garcia,et al.  Los alumnos y los profesores como evaluadores. Aplicación a la calificación de presentaciones orales , 2009, Revista Española de Pedagogía.

[13]  Nancy Falchikov,et al.  Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education , 2005 .

[14]  W. Rod Cullen,et al.  Relationships between student characteristics and self‐, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations , 2008 .

[15]  John Hattie,et al.  Calibration and confidence: Where to next? , 2013 .

[16]  D. Boud,et al.  Rethinking assessment in higher education : learning for the longer term , 2007 .

[17]  Mpofu,et al.  Self and tutor evaluations in problem‐based learning tutorials: is there a relationship? , 1998, Medical education.

[18]  Anders Jonsson,et al.  The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review. , 2013 .

[19]  W. Rod Cullen,et al.  Peer assessment of oral presentations: effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria , 2005 .

[20]  Ernesto Panadero,et al.  To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy , 2014 .

[21]  Domingo Verano-Tacoronte,et al.  Is University Students’ Self-Assessment Accurate? , 2015 .

[22]  Daniella Acker,et al.  Cross-Cultural Overconfidence and Biased Self-Attribution , 2008 .

[23]  Aitor Diaz Lucas LA EMPLEABILIDAD DE LOS INGENIEROS INDUSTRIALES ESPAÑOLES , 2013 .

[24]  D. Sluijsmans,et al.  The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review , 1999 .

[25]  Rafael García Ros Análisis y validación de una rúbrica para evaluar habilidades de presentación oral en contextos universitarios , 2011 .

[26]  H. Andrade,et al.  Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment , 2005 .

[27]  Gavin T. L. Brown,et al.  The Future of Self-Assessment in Classroom Practice: Reframing Self-Assessment as a Core Competency. , 2014 .

[28]  Anders Jonsson,et al.  The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity, and educational consequences , 2007 .

[29]  D. Boud,et al.  Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings , 1989 .

[30]  Douglas Magin,et al.  Peer and Teacher Assessments of Oral Presentation Skills: How reliable are they? , 2001 .

[31]  Flora P. McMartin,et al.  Methods to improve the validity and sensitivity of a self/peer assessment instrument , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[32]  G. Pallier,et al.  Gender Differences in the Self-Assessment of Accuracy on Cognitive Tasks , 2003 .

[33]  Haomiao Jia,et al.  Peer, professor and self-evaluation of class participation , 2007 .

[34]  David Boud,et al.  THE ROLE OF SELF‐ASSESSMENT IN STUDENT GRADING , 1989 .

[35]  M. Taras,et al.  Student self-assessment: processes and consequences , 2010 .

[36]  Dominique Simone Rychen,et al.  Key Competencies for a Successful Life and a Well-Functioning Society , 2003 .