Use of research-based instructional strategies: how to avoid faculty quitting
暂无分享,去创建一个
We have examined the teaching practices of faculty members who adopted research-based instructional strategies as part of the Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative (CWSEI) at the University of British Columbia. Of the 70 that adopted such strategies with the support of the CWSEI program, only one subsequently stopped using these strategies. This is a tiny fraction of the 33% stopping rate for physics faculty in general [Henderson, Dancy, and Niewiadomska-Bugaj, PRST-PER, 8, 020104 (2012)]. Nearly all of these UBC faculty members who had an opportunity to subsequently use RBIS in other courses (without CWSEI support) did so. We offer possible explanations for the difference in quitting rates. The direct support of the faculty member by a trained science education specialist in the discipline during the initial implementation of the new strategies may be the most important factor.
[1] C. Wieman,et al. Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progressxs , 2010 .
[2] C. Henderson,et al. Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature , 2011 .
[3] M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj,et al. Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? , 2012 .