Modal Equalization of Loudspeaker-Room Responses at Low Frequencies

The control of excessively long decays in a listening room with strong low-frequency modes is problematic, expensive, and sometimes impossible with conventional passive means. A systematic methodology is presented to design active modal equalization able to selectively reduce the mode decay rate of a loudspeaker ‐ room system at low frequencies in the vicinity of a sound engineer’s listening location. Modal equalization is able to increase the rate of initial sound decay at mode frequencies, and can be used with conventional magnitude equalization to optimize the reproduced sound quality. Two methods of implementing active modal equalization are proposed. The first modifies the primary sound such that the mode decay rates are controlled. The second uses separate secondary radiators and controls the mode decays with additional sound fed into the secondary radiators. Case studies are presented of implementing active modal control according to the first method.

[1]  Steven J. Elliott,et al.  Practical Implementation of Low-Frequency Equalization Using Adaptive Digital Filters , 1994 .

[2]  Allan R. Groh,et al.  High Fidelity Sound System Equalization by Analysis of Standing Waves , 1974 .

[3]  Matti Karjalainen,et al.  New Digital Filter Techniques for Room Response Modeling , 2002 .

[4]  Sylvain Marchand,et al.  High-Precision Fourier Analysis of Sounds Using Signal Derivatives , 2000 .

[5]  M. Schroeder.  New Method of Measuring Reverberation Time , 1965 .

[6]  Louis Dunn Fielder.  Analysis of traditional and reverberation-reducing methods of room equalization , 2003 .

[7]  R. Walker.  Equalization of Room Acoustics and Adaptive Systems in the Equalization of Small Room Acoustics , 1998 .

[8]  Günther Theile,et al.  Multichannel Surround Sound Systems and Operations Wieslaw Woszczyk -chair (wvw@aes.org) Juergen Herre -vice Chair (hrr@aes.org) Robert Schulein -vice Chair (rbs@aes.org) Technical Committees Acoustics & Sound Reinforcement Archiving, Restoration and Digital Libraries Audio Coding Automotive Audio H , .

[9]  John D. Bunton,et al.  Cumulative Spectra, Tone Bursts, and Apodization , 1982 .

[10]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[11]  Matti Karjalainen,et al.  Frequency-Zooming ARMA Modeling of Resonant and Reverberant Systems , 2002 .

[12]  Sean Olive,et al.  The Modification of Timbre by Resonances: Perception and Measurement , 1988 .

[13]  Ronald P. Genereux.  Adaptive Loudspeaker Systems: Correcting for the Acoustic Environment , 1990 .

[14]  Vesa Välimäki,et al.  Comparison of Modal Equalizer Design Methods , 2003 .

[15]  Philip A. Nelson,et al.  Multiple-Point Equalization in a Room Using Adaptive Digital Filters , 1989 .

[16]  William J. Davies,et al.  Perception of Reverberation Time in Small Listening Rooms , 2002 .

[17]  Julius O. Smith,et al.  PARSHL: An Analysis/Synthesis Program for Non-Harmonic Sounds Based on a Sinusoidal Representation , 1987, ICMC.

[18]  John Mourjopoulos,et al.  Digital Equalization of Room Acoustics , 1994 .

[19]  Sean Olive,et al.  The Detection Thresholds of Resonances at Low Frequencies , 1997 .

[20]  Kenneth Steiglitz.  A Note on Constant-Gain Digital Resonators , 1994 .

[21]  Mark R. Avis.  Q-factor Modification for Low-frequency Room Modes , 2002 .

[22]  John Mourjopoulos,et al.  Pole and zero modeling of room transfer functions , 1991 .

[23]  Matti Karjalainen,et al.  Estimation of Modal Decay Parameters from Noisy Response Measurements , 2002 .