Adaptation and Performance in New Businesses: Understanding the Moderating Effects of Independence and Industry

New ventures as well as new business units experience significant difficulties in finding a viable business model. They often need to adapt their initial business model due to the presence of uncertainty and ambiguity. Technology-based companies are confronted with particularly high degrees of uncertainty and ambiguity. We hypothesize that adaptation is crucial for the performance (measured as survival) of these businesses, but that this effect is moderated by the (in)dependence of the new technology-based business and by the industry in which it is active. We test the adaptation-performance hypothesis through a survival analysis of a sample of 117 independent new ventures and business units. Our findings suggest that adaptation is beneficial in less mature, capital-intensive and high-velocity industries but not so in more mature, stable industries. Also, adaptation reduces failure rates in dependent business units as compared to independent ventures.

[1]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime , 1991 .

[2]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[3]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Theory and Research in Organizational Ecology , 1990 .

[4]  Pat H. Dickson,et al.  The Influence of National Culture on the Formation of Technology Alliances by Entrepreneurial Firms , 2000 .

[5]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[6]  A. Bhide.  The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses , 2000 .

[7]  K. Möller,et al.  How Does Adaptability Drive Firm Innovativeness , 2004 .

[8]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  The satisficing principle in capability learning , 2000 .

[9]  Erkko Autio,et al.  Does the innovator role affect the perceived potential for growth? analysis of four types of new, technology-based firms , 1998 .

[10]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[11]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[12]  Subhash Sharma.  Applied multivariate techniques , 1995 .

[13]  B. Guile,et al.  Technology and global industry : companies and nations in the world economy , 1987 .

[14]  Amar Bhidé,et al.  How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work , 1994 .

[15]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Rögnvaldur J. Saemundsson,et al.  How Business Opportunities Constrain Young Technology-Based Firms from Growing into Medium-Sized Firms , 2005 .

[17]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[18]  M. Hannan,et al.  A Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914-1990 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[20]  G. Hamel.  Leading the Revolution , 2000 .

[21]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[22]  B. Looy,et al.  Understanding new venture market application search processes: A propositional model , 2004 .

[23]  R. Brockhaus.  The Psychology of the Entrepreneur , 1982 .

[24]  Ehud Zuscovitch,et al.  Networks and market creation , 1991 .

[25]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Rigid Disk Drive Industry: A History of Commercial and Technological Turbulence , 1993, Business History Review.

[26]  K. Vesper,et al.  Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship , 1982 .

[27]  P. Drucker.  Innovation and entrepreneurship : practice and principles , 1985 .

[28]  Rodney C. Shrader.  Collaboration and Performance in Foreign Markets: The Case of Young High-Technology Manufacturing Firms , 2001 .

[29]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[30]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[31]  Lívia Markóczy,et al.  Modes of Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[32]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[33]  G. Willard,et al.  Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms , 1990 .

[34]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[35]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .

[36]  Devi Jankowicz.  From `Learning Organization' to `Adaptive Organization' , 2000 .

[37]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Survival analysis using sas®: a practical guide , 1995 .

[38]  Gaylen N. Chandler,et al.  Tightening the Life-Cycle Construct: A Taxonomic Study of Growth Stage Configurations in High-Technology Organizations , 1994 .

[39]  C. M. van Praag.  Business Survival and Success of Young Small Business Owners , 2003 .

[40]  C. Brush,et al.  A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance , 1992 .

[41]  C. Druilhe.  Tracking the emergence and progress of university spin-out cases , 2002, IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[42]  H. Chesbrough.  The Governance and Performance of Xerox's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2003 .

[43]  J. March,et al.  Handbook of organizations , 1966 .

[44]  Matthias Almus,et al.  Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: Which Factors Matter? , 1999 .

[45]  L. G. Hrebiniak,et al.  Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and Environmental Determinism. , 1985 .

[46]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[47]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[48]  Gwendolyn K. Lee.  The significance of network resources in the race to enter emerging product markets: the convergence of telephony communications and computer networking, 1989–2001 , 2007 .

[49]  David Carson,et al.  Issues which Impact upon Marketing in the Small Firm , 2003 .

[50]  Elizabeth Webster,et al.  Innovation and Industrial Evolution , 2007 .

[51]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Strategic Adaptability and Firm Performance: A Market-Contingent Perspective , 1989 .

[52]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter? , 2004 .

[53]  Micah Altman,et al.  Convergence Problems in Logistic Regression , 2004 .

[54]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[55]  S. Venkataraman.  Chapter 1 The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research , 2019, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth.

[56]  Julie M. Hite,et al.  The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm , 2001 .

[57]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[58]  B. Clarysse,et al.  A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off , 2004 .

[59]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[60]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[61]  Matthew S. Kraatz.  Learning by Association? Interorganizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change , 1998 .

[62]  William B. Gartner,et al.  Predicting new venture survival: An analysis of “anatomy of a start-up.” cases from Inc. Magazine , 1999 .

[63]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Using Subjective Evaluations of Organizational Performance in Small Business Research , 1988 .

[64]  D. Shepherd,et al.  New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks, and risk reduction strategies , 2000 .

[65]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[66]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  New Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function , 1995 .

[67]  D. Foray.  The secrets of industry are in the air: Industrial cooperation and the organizational dynamics of the innovative firm , 1991 .

[68]  David R. Cox.  The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[69]  S. Klepper.  Employee Startups in High‐Tech Industries , 2001 .

[70]  Heather A. Haveman.  Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation , 1993 .

[71]  John W. Evans,et al.  Alienation and learning in a hospital setting. , 1962 .

[72]  Cynthia A. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  Innovation and Competitive Advantage: What We Know and What We Need to Learn , 1992 .

[73]  B. Chakravarthy.  Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Management , 1982 .

[74]  J. A. Timmons.  New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship in the 1990s , 1990 .

[75]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[76]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[77]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .

[78]  M. Berry,et al.  Combining technology and corporate strategy in small high tech firms , 1998 .

[79]  M. Meyer,et al.  Product strategy and corporate success , 1991 .

[80]  Gordon E. Greenley,et al.  Consequences of High and Low Adaptive Capability in UK Companies , 1995 .

[81]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The internationalization and performance of SMEs , 2001 .

[82]  A. Bhide,et al.  Bootstrap finance: the art of start-ups. , 1992, Harvard business review.