Predicting Biological Gender and Intelligence From fMRI via Dynamic Functional Connectivity

Recent works have explored the neuronal functional differences in biological gender and intelligence using static functional connectivity. OBJECTIVE This paper explores the predictive capability of dynamic functional connectivity extracted from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the human brain. METHODS Several stateof-the-art features extracted from static functional connectivity of the brain are employed to predict biological gender and intelligence using publicly available Human Connectome Project (HCP) database. Next, a novel tensor parallel factor (PARAFAC) decomposition model is proposed to decompose sequence of dynamic connectivity matrices into common connectivity components that are orthonormal to each other, common time-courses, and corresponding distinct subject-wise weights. The subject-wise loading of the components are employed to predict biological gender and intelligence using a random forest classifier (respectively,regressor)using5-foldcross-validation. RESULTS The results demonstrate that dynamic functional connectivity can indeed classify biological gender with a high accuracy (0.94, where male identification accuracy was 0.87 and female identification accuracy was 0.97). It can also predict intelligence with less normalized means quare error (0.139 for fluid intelligence and 0.031 for fluid ability metrics) compared with other functional connectivity measures (the nearest mean square error were 0.147 and 0.037 for fluid intelligence and fluid ability metrics, respectively using static connectivity approaches). CONCLUSION Our work is an important milestone for the understanding of nonstationary behavior of hemodynamic blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in brain and how they are associated with biological gender and intelligence. SIGNIFICANCE The paper demonstrates that dynamic behavior of brain can contribute substantially towards forming a fingerprint of biological gender and intelligence.

[1]  Sylvain Bouix,et al.  Medial Frontal White and Gray Matter Contributions to General Intelligence , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity during task performance and rest predicts individual differences in attention across studies , 2019, NeuroImage.

[3]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives , 2017, NeuroImage.

[5]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  Predicting Male vs. Female from Task-fMRI Brain Connectivity , 2019, 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  Grey Ballard,et al.  Dynamic Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity Tensor Decomposition: A New Approach to Analyze and Interpret Dynamic Brain Connectivity , 2019, Brain Connect..

[7]  Emiliano Santarnecchi,et al.  Network connectivity correlates of variability in fluid intelligence performance , 2017 .

[8]  Yu-Ping Wang,et al.  A GICA-TVGL framework to study sex differences in resting state fMRI dynamic connectivity , 2019, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A method for functional network connectivity among spatially independent resting-state components in schizophrenia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Interaction among subsystems within default mode network diminished in schizophrenia patients: A dynamic connectivity approach , 2016, Schizophrenia Research.

[11]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  MUSE: Minimum Uncertainty and Sample Elimination Based Binary Feature Selection , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[12]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  Diffusion markers of dendritic density and arborization in gray matter predict differences in intelligence , 2018, Nature Communications.

[13]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest , 2013, NeuroImage.

[15]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits , 2018, Nature Communications.

[16]  Baxter P. Rogers,et al.  Analyzing the association between functional connectivity of the brain and intellectual performance , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Automatic Identification of Functional Clusters in fMRI Data Using Spatial Dependence , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  Classification of obsessive-compulsive disorder from resting-state fMRI , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[19]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Tensor Decomposition for Signal Processing and Machine Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[20]  A. Barbey Network Neuroscience Theory of Human Intelligence , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  D. Halpern,et al.  The new science of cognitive sex differences , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  D. Hu,et al.  Heredity characteristics of schizophrenia shown by dynamic functional connectivity analysis of resting-state functional MRI scans of unaffected siblings , 2016, Neuroreport.

[23]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Capturing Dynamic Connectivity From Resting State fMRI Using Time-Varying Graphical Lasso , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Arthur W Toga,et al.  Relationships between IQ and regional cortical gray matter thickness in healthy adults. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  V. Calhoun,et al.  EEG Signatures of Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity States , 2017, Brain Topography.

[27]  Alex R. Smith,et al.  Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Hoi-Jun Yoo,et al.  A Wearable Neuro-Feedback System With EEG-Based Mental Status Monitoring and Transcranial Electrical Stimulation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[29]  A. C. Aitken IV.—On Least Squares and Linear Combination of Observations , 1936 .

[30]  P. Schönemann,et al.  A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem , 1966 .

[31]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  Extraction of common task signals and spatial maps from group fMRI using a PARAFAC-based tensor decomposition technique , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[32]  J. Morton,et al.  Tracking the Brain's Functional Coupling Dynamics over Development , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Gur,et al.  Development of Abbreviated Nine-Item Forms of the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Test , 2012, Assessment.

[34]  Selin Aviyente,et al.  Tensor Based Temporal and Multilayer Community Detection for Studying Brain Dynamics During Resting State fMRI , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  A. Belger,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[36]  Christophe Lenglet,et al.  Function-specific and Enhanced Brain Structural Connectivity Mapping via Joint Modeling of Diffusion and Functional MRI , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Gender Differences in Global Functional Connectivity During Facial Emotion Processing: A Visual MMN Study , 2018, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[38]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.

[39]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  Ranking Regions, Edges and Classifying Tasks in Functional Brain Graphs by Sub-Graph Entropy , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[40]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Kathryn R. Cullen,et al.  Network analysis of functional brain connectivity in borderline personality disorder using resting-state fMRI , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[42]  R. Bluhm,et al.  Default mode network connectivity: effects of age, sex, and analytic approach , 2008, Neuroreport.

[43]  Yong He,et al.  BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Functional connectivity predicts gender: Evidence for gender differences in resting brain connectivity , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[45]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Distinct Global Brain Dynamics and Spatiotemporal Organization of the Salience Network , 2016, PLoS biology.

[46]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Functional brain networks related to individual differences in human intelligence at rest , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[47]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  Sub-graph entropy based network approaches for classifying adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder from resting-state functional MRI , 2020, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[48]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[49]  R. Bro PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications , 1997 .

[50]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[51]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest , 2015, NeuroImage.

[52]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[53]  Paola Galdi,et al.  A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data , 2018, bioRxiv.

[54]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  Classification of Major Depressive Disorder from Resting-State fMRI , 2019, 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[55]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[56]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Kruskal's permutation lemma and the identification of CANDECOMP/PARAFAC and bilinear models with constant modulus constraints , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[57]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  Yong He,et al.  Hemisphere- and gender-related differences in small-world brain networks: A resting-state functional MRI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[59]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[60]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Temporal stability of functional brain modules associated with human intelligence , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[61]  Vesa Kiviniemi,et al.  A Sliding Time-Window ICA Reveals Spatial Variability of the Default Mode Network in Time , 2011, Brain Connect..

[62]  Sreevalsan S. Menon,et al.  A Comparison of Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivities for Identifying Subjects and Biological Sex Using Intrinsic Individual Brain Connectivity , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[63]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  Low-Complexity Seizure Prediction From iEEG/sEEG Using Spectral Power and Ratios of Spectral Power , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[64]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[65]  Dongdong Lin,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity impairments in early schizophrenia and clinical high-risk for psychosis , 2017, NeuroImage.

[66]  Sylvain Arlot,et al.  A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection , 2009, 0907.4728.

[67]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  A state-space model of cross-region dynamic connectivity in MEG/EEG , 2016, NIPS.

[68]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[69]  D Rudrauf,et al.  Distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic coherence analysis of resting fMRI data to jointly capture state-based phase, frequency, and time-domain information , 2015, NeuroImage.

[71]  C. Sripada,et al.  Toward a “treadmill test” for cognition: Improved prediction of general cognitive ability from the task activated brain , 2020, Human brain mapping.

[72]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[73]  Christophe Lenglet,et al.  Hierarchical topological network analysis of anatomical human brain connectivity and differences related to sex and kinship , 2012, NeuroImage.

[74]  Lin Yao,et al.  Resting Tremor Detection in Parkinson's Disease with Machine Learning and Kalman Filtering , 2018, 2018 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).