Decision Support Systems IV – Information and Knowledge Management in Decision Processes: Euro Working Group Conferences, EWG-DSS 2014, Toulouse, France, June 10–13, 2014, and Barcelona, Spain, July 13–18, 2014, Revised Selected and Extended Papers

In current knowledge economy, organizations have identified knowledge sharing as a catalyst to improve business. Therefore, the need to build relationships between organizational processes and knowledge activities are crucial to gain competitive advantages over competitors. However, there are new challenges facing organizations in transferring from business processes to knowledge processes. This paper suggests an integrative knowledge sharing performance framework based on the analysis of literature and the exploration of key performance indicators. Performance measurement is used to evaluate and measure the impact of knowledge sharing to organizational performance, this measurement can further provide support for organizational decision making. A major contribution of this paper is providing suggestions for future research and practices on how knowledge sharing can improve efficiency and effectiveness of employees, also reduce cost and errors in organizational business processes.

[1]  Andrew H. Kydd When Can Mediators Build Trust? , 2006, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Schmooze or Lose: Social Friction and Lubrication in E-Mail Negotiations , 2000 .

[3]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming in electronic communication , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[5]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[6]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[7]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[8]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[9]  John K. Butler Trust Expectations, Information Sharing, Climate of Trust, and Negotiation Effectiveness and Efficiency , 1999 .

[10]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Interpersonal Attraction: An Experimental Test of Two Explanatory Hypotheses , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[12]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Love's best habit: Deception in the context of relationships. , 1999 .

[13]  E. Katsh,et al.  Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace , 2001 .

[14]  Charles E. Naquin,et al.  Online bargaining and interpersonal trust. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  M. Deutsch Trust and suspicion , 1958 .

[16]  C. Parks,et al.  High And Low Trusters' Responses To Fear in a Payoff Matrix , 1995 .

[17]  S. Koeszegi,et al.  Hot Versus Cool Behavioural Styles in Electronic Negotiations: The Impact of Communication Mode , 2006 .

[18]  P. Keen,et al.  Electronic Commerce Relationships: Trust by Design , 1999 .

[19]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Negotiating via information technology: Theory and application , 2002 .

[20]  R. C. Sherman,et al.  A reexamination of deindividuation in synchronous computer-mediated communication , 1999 .

[21]  John A Scigliano,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed: Deborah L. Duarte and Nancy Tennant Snyder. (2000). 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 256 pages. ISBN: 0-7879-5589-2W01. US$39.95, includes a CD-ROM , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Sally Engle Merry,et al.  Mediator Settlement Strategies , 1986 .

[23]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[24]  G. Bains,et al.  The Potential for Mediating Disputes Online , 2009 .

[25]  John Winslade,et al.  A Narrative Approach to the Practice of Mediation , 1998 .

[26]  Melinda A. Green,et al.  Online versus face-to-face conversation: An examination of relational and discourse variables. , 2003 .

[27]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  'A MATTER OF TRUST' : EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATION ON THE EFFICIENCY AND DISTRIBUTION OF OUTCOMES , 1998 .