The quest for artificial wisdom

The term “Contemplative sciences” refers to an interdisciplinary approach to mind that aims at a better understanding of alternative states of consciousness, like those obtained trough deep concentration and meditation, mindfulness and other “superior” or “spiritual” mental states. There is, however, a key discipline missing: artificial intelligence. AI has forgotten its original aims to create intelligent machines that could help us to understand better what intelligence is and is more worried about pragmatical stuff, so almost nobody in the field seems to be interested to join this new effort of contemplative science. In this paper, I would like to accomplish the following: (1) To give a brief description of the field of “contemplative sciences;” (2) To argue why AI should actively join this new paradigm on the study of the mind; and (3) To set up a research program on artificial wisdom: that is to design computational systems that can model at least some relevant aspects of human wisdom.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: An Empirical Science , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[2]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[3]  U. Staudinger,et al.  Wisdom. A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[4]  Andy Clark,et al.  Microcognition: Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing , 1989 .

[5]  S. S. Hall Wisdom: From Philosophy to Neuroscience , 2010 .

[6]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Organismically-inspired robotics: homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop , 2003 .

[7]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[8]  S. Pinker How the Mind Works , 1999, Philosophy after Darwin.

[9]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency , 2005 .

[10]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind , 2009, Artif. Intell..

[11]  H. Dreyfus Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing it Would Require Making it More Heideggerian , 2007 .

[12]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  Compositionality: A Connectionist Variation on a Classical Theme , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Monika Ardelt,et al.  Wisdom as Expert Knowledge System: A Critical Review of a Contemporary Operationalization of an Ancient Concept , 2004, Human Development.

[14]  U. Staudinger,et al.  People nominated as wise: a comparative study of wisdom-related knowledge. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[15]  Martin Ringle,et al.  Philosophical Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence , 1980 .

[16]  John McCarthy,et al.  Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines , 1979 .

[17]  John McCarthy,et al.  What Computers Still Can't Do , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[18]  R. K. Lindsay What Computers Can't Do. A Critique of Artificial Reason. Hubert L. Dreyfus. Harper and Row, New York, 1972. xxxvi, 260 pp. $8.95 , 1972 .

[19]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[20]  F. Varela,et al.  NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem , 1996 .

[21]  P. Baltes The aging mind: potential and limits. , 1993, The Gerontologist.

[22]  Marina Basu The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2004 .

[23]  F. Varela Patterns of Life: Intertwining Identity and Cognition , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  D. Hofstadter,et al.  Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1979 .

[25]  Aaron Sloman,et al.  Interactions Between Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence: The Role of Intuition and Non-Logical Reasoning in Intelligence , 1971, IJCAI.

[26]  Dalai Lama Xiv Bstan-ʾdzin-rgya-mtsho,et al.  Gentle Bridges: Conversations with the Dalai Lama on the Sciences of Mind , 1992 .

[27]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI , 1999 .

[28]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  What computers still can't do - a critique of artificial reason , 1992 .

[29]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[30]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing It Would Require Making It More Heideggerian , 2008 .

[31]  T. van Gelder The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[32]  T. Gelder,et al.  The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  S. Strijbos,et al.  How can systems thinking help us in bridging the gap between science and wisdom? , 1995 .

[34]  E. Thompson Mind in Life , 2007 .