Understanding the consumer propensity to observe

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the tendency of some consumers to use the purchase behavior of unknown other consumers as a purchase decision heuristic, by first developing a measure of the consumer propensity to observe. The effects of likely individual consumer factors are then tested.Design/methodology/approach – A total of 356 consumers participated in the study by completing a questionnaire containing items measuring the constructs of interest. The modeled relationships of variables were tested using structural equation modeling with interaction terms.Findings – The specified model was found to explain 43 per cent and 44 per cent of consumers' propensity to directly and indirectly observe, respectively. Key antecedents identified as significant influencers of propensity to observe are consumer risk aversion, brand choice overload, self‐confidence, and propensity to conform to group norms. Additionally, moderating effects are identified, indicating that propensity to observe is highe...

[1]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[2]  James B. Wilcox,et al.  The persuasive impact of reported group opinions on individuals low vs. high in need for cognition: Rationalization vs. biased elaboration? , 2000 .

[3]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[4]  Stephen A. Doyle,et al.  Till shopping us do part – the service requirements of divorced male fashion shoppers , 2001 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[6]  Julie B. Sincoff,et al.  The psychological characteristics of ambivalent people , 1990 .

[7]  W. Bearden,et al.  Consumer Self‐Confidence: Refinements in Conceptualization and Measurement , 2001 .

[8]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Brand-extension price premiums: The effects of perceived fit and extension product category risk , 2005 .

[9]  Colin Camerer.  Three Cheers—Psychological, Theoretical, Empirical—for Loss Aversion , 2005 .

[10]  William O. Bearden,et al.  Attention to Social Comparison Information: An Individual Difference Factor Affecting Consumer Conformity , 1990 .

[11]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Effects of Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision Effectiveness , 1987 .

[12]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Spending Time versus Spending Money , 2004 .

[13]  N. Malhotra.  Information Load and Consumer Decision Making , 1982 .

[14]  M. Zeelenberg.  Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision-making , 1999 .

[15]  D. Gerbing,et al.  Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis , 1996 .

[16]  Ajay K. Manrai,et al.  Simulation Experiments in Choice Simplification: The Effects of Task and Context on Forecasting Performance , 1998 .

[17]  Cele C. Otnes,et al.  Unacquainted influencers: When strangers interact in the retail setting , 1995 .

[18]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  Warranty and Other Extrinsic Cue Effects on Consumers' Risk Perceptions , 1982 .

[19]  V. L. Allen.  Situational Factors In Conformity1 , 1965 .

[20]  James R. Bailey,et al.  Need for cognition and response mode in the active construction of an information domain , 1997 .

[21]  G Tunnel,et al.  The discrepancy between private and public selves: public self-consciousness and its correlates. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[22]  Richard Staelin,et al.  The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements , 1983 .

[23]  C. Whan Park,et al.  Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence , 1977 .

[24]  James E. Burroughs,et al.  Do Reverse-Worded Items Confound Measures in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research? The Case of the Material Values Scale , 2003 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision , 1992 .

[26]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[27]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence , 1989 .

[28]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior , 1975 .

[29]  H. Kelley,et al.  Certainty of judgment and resistance to social influence. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[30]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance , 1999 .

[31]  George B. Sproles,et al.  A methodology for profiling consumers' decision-making styles , 1986 .

[32]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Need for Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the Role of Personality Variables in Consumer Behavior , 1992 .

[33]  Peter W. Hermann,et al.  The Effect of Self-Confidence and Anxiety on Information Seeking in Consumer Risk Reduction , 1979 .

[34]  R. Ping.  A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables , 1995 .

[35]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Need for Cognition and Advertising , 1992 .

[36]  Timothy B. Heath,et al.  Communicating Quality Through Signals and Substantive Messages: the Effects of Supporting Information and Need For Cognition , 2002 .

[37]  C. Hjorth-Andersen.  Price as a risk indicator , 1987 .

[38]  P. S. Raju.  Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics, and Exploratory Behavior , 1980 .

[39]  Tracy L. Tuten,et al.  Understanding differences in web usage: The role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. , 2001 .

[40]  Ben Weeks.  The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less , 2004 .

[41]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[42]  D. Mick,et al.  Are Studies of Dark Side Variables Confounded by Socially Desirable Responding? The Case of Materialism , 1996 .

[43]  I. Simonson,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF ANTICIPATING REGRET AND RESPONSIBILITY ON PURCHASE DECISIONS , 1992 .

[44]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  Preference heterogeneity and coorientation as determinants of perceived informational influence , 1989 .

[45]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  Perceived risk and information search. A systematic meta-analysis of the empirical evidence , 1985 .

[46]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation , 2004 .

[47]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Ran Kivetz,et al.  The Effects of Incomplete Information on Consumer Choice , 2000 .

[49]  J. W. Taylor.  The role of risk in consumer behavior. , 1974 .

[50]  M. Wedel,et al.  A CROSS -NATIONAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE INDIVIDUAL AND NATIONAL CULTURAL ANTECEDENTS OF CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS , 1999 .

[51]  B. Schwartz.  The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less , 2004 .

[52]  B J Bushman.  What's in a name? The moderating role of public self-consciousness on the relation between brand label and brand preference. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  J. Gotlieb,et al.  The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-perceived Risk Relationship , 1994 .

[54]  J. Swait,et al.  The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching , 2001 .

[55]  Grant Mccracken.  Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process , 1989 .

[56]  J. Jaccard,et al.  LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[57]  Byung-Kwan Lee,et al.  The effect of information overload on consumer choice quality in an on-line environment , 2004 .

[58]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[59]  R. Dhar.  Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option , 1997 .

[60]  Joel Herche,et al.  Reversed-polarity items and scale unidimensionality , 1996 .

[61]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[62]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Informational Social Influence and Product Evaluation. , 1972 .

[63]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[64]  J. P. Das,et al.  Understanding versus suggestion in the judgement of literary passages. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[65]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Research Design Effects on the Reliability of Rating Scales: A Meta-Analysis , 1984 .

[66]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  J. Bettman.  An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[68]  H. Kelley,et al.  Attribution theory and research. , 1980, Annual review of psychology.

[69]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[70]  D. Scammon.  "Information Load" and Consumers , 1977 .

[71]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  Consumer Conformity: Review and Applications for Marketing Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[72]  K. Zhou,et al.  Face consciousness and risk aversion: Do they affect consumer decision‐making? , 2003 .

[73]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Consumer Knowledge Assessment , 1994 .

[74]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[75]  R. Lennox,et al.  Revision of the self-monitoring scale. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[76]  G. Tellis,et al.  Growing, Growing, Gone: Cascades, Diffusion, and Turning Points in the Product Life Cycle , 2004 .