A model of technological breakthrough in the renewable energy sector

Models with induced technological change in the energy sector often predict a gradual expansion of renewable energies, and a substantial share of fossil fuels remaining in the energy mix through the end of our century. However, there are historical examples where new products or technologies expanded rapidly and achieved a high output in a relatively short period of time. This paper explores the possibility of a 'technological breakthrough' in the renewable energy sector, using a partial equilibrium model of energy generation with endogenous R&D. Our results indicate, that due to increasing returns-to-scale, a multiplicity of equilibria can arise. In the model, two stable states can coexist, one characterized by a lower and one by higher supply of renewable energy. The transition from the low-output to the high-output equilibrium is characterized by a discontinuous rise in R&D activity and capacity investments in the renewable energy sector. The transition can be triggered by a rise in world energy demand, by a drop in the supply of fossil fuels, or by policy intervention. Under market conditions, the transition occurs later than in the social optimum. Hence, we identify a market failure related to path-dependence and technological lock-in, that can justify a strong policy intervention initially. Paradoxically, well-intended energy-saving policies can actually lead to higher emissions, as they reduce the incentives to invest in renewable energies by having a cushioning effect on the energy price. Hence, these policies should be supplemented by other instruments that restore the incentives to invest in renewable energies. Finally, we discuss the influence of monopoly power in the market for innovations. We show that market power can alleviate the problem of technological lock-in, but creates a new market failure that reduces static efficiency.

[1]  David Popp,et al.  Induced Innovation and Energy Prices , 2001 .

[2]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation , 2008 .

[3]  L. Goulder,et al.  Optimal Co2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change , 1998 .

[4]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[5]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[6]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming , 2000 .

[7]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate , 2008 .

[8]  Frank C. Krysiak,et al.  Prices vs. quantities: The effects on technology choice , 2008 .

[9]  Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla A Policy Approach to the Environmental Impacts of Technological Lock-In , 2006 .

[10]  R. Gerlagh A climate-change policy induced shift from innovations in carbon-energy production to carbon-energy savings , 2008 .

[11]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Rolling the ‘DICE’: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases , 1993 .

[12]  C. Wene Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[13]  David Popp,et al.  Entice: Endogenous Technological Change in the Dice Model of Global Warming , 2003 .

[14]  E. Helpman General purpose technologies and economic growth , 1998 .

[15]  Marcus Janssen,et al.  The battle of perspectives: a multi-agent model with adaptive responses to climate change , 1998 .

[16]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies , 1999 .

[17]  David Popp,et al.  Entice-Br: The Effects of Backstop Technology R&D on Climate Policy Models , 2004 .

[18]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Climate Treaties and "Breakthrough" Technologies , 2006 .

[19]  Gregory C. Unruh Escaping carbon lock-in , 2002 .

[20]  W. Nordhaus An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases , 1992, Science.

[21]  Gregory C. Unruh,et al.  Globalizing carbon lock-in , 2006 .

[22]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy , 1994 .

[23]  Rob Hart,et al.  The timing of taxes on CO2 emissions when technological change is endogenous , 2008 .

[24]  R. Gerlagh,et al.  Optimal Timing of Climate Change Policy: Interaction Between Carbon Taxes and Innovation Externalities , 2009 .

[25]  Reyer Gerlagh,et al.  Carbon taxes: a drop in the ocean, or a drop that erodes the stone? The effect of carbon taxes on technological change , 2005 .

[26]  John M. Gowdy,et al.  Evolutionary Theories in Environmental and Resource Economics: Approaches and Applications , 2000 .

[27]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Modeling Induced Innovation in Climate Change Policy , 2002 .

[28]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  The impact of technological change on climate protection and welfare: Insights from the model MIND , 2005 .

[29]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Technological change and the environment , 2002 .