Comparison between different tests and their combination for prediction of difficult intubation: An analytical study

Context: There is an impelling need for accurate tests to predict difficult intubation, as failure to achieve endotracheal intubation causes significant morbidity and mortality in anesthetic practice. Aim: To calculate the validity of the different tests along with their combination and agreement when compared with endotracheal intubation in predicting difficult intubation. Settings and Design: Operation theaters, analytical study. Materials and Methods: Three hundred patients aged between 16 and 60 years of American society of anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I and II, scheduled for elective surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation were studied during January-July 2012. Mallampati grade (MP), sternomental distance (SMD), thyromental distance (TMD), and Delilkan and Calder test were recorded for every patient. Endotracheal intubation was performed by an experienced anesthesiologist blinded to the measurements and recorded grading of intubation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), likelihood ratio (LR), odds ratio (OR), and kappa coefficient of tests individually and in combination were calculated. Statistical Analysis Used: IBM SPSS software (version 16.0) and Epi-info software (version 3.2). Results: Difficult and failed intubation was 13.3% and 0.6%, respectively. Difficult intubation increased with age. TMD and Calder test showed highest sensitivity individually and Dellilkan's test showed least sensitivity. Among the combination of tests, MP with SMD and MP with Calder test had the highest sensitivity. Conclusion: Among individual test TMD and Calder are better predictive tests in terms of sensitivity. Combination of tests increases the chance of prediction of difficult intubation.

[1]  J. Wetterslev,et al.  Poor prognostic value of the modified Mallampati score: a meta-analysis involving 177 088 patients. , 2011, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  M. Rasouli,et al.  The Diagnostic Value of the Upper Lip Bite Test Combined with Sternomental Distance, Thyromental Distance, and Interincisor Distance for Prediction of Easy Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Study , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  R. Domi.  A Comparison of Wilson Sum Score and Combination Mallampati, Tiromental and Sternomental Distances for Predicting Difficult Intubation , 2009 .

[4]  A. Ross,et al.  Predictive Performance of Three Multivariate Difficult Tracheal Intubation Models: A Double-Blind, Case-Controlled Study , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  Sunanda Gupta,et al.  Airway assessment : Predictors of difficult airway , 2005 .

[6]  I. Tekdemir,et al.  Should We Reevaluate the Variables for Predicting the Difficult Airway in Anesthesiology? , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  E. Rimm,et al.  Predicting Difficult Endotracheal Intubation in Surgical Patients Scheduled for General Anesthesia: A Prospective Blind Study , 1995, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  D Savva,et al.  Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Predicting difficult intubation. , 1988, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  J. Rud.  Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: A closed claims analysis , 1990 .

[11]  J. R. Young,et al.  Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study , 1987, Anaesthesia.