Investigation of the Influence of Roughness and Dental Implant Design on Primary Stability via Analysis of Insertion Torque and Implant Stability Quotient: An In Vitro Study

In the placement of dental implants, the primary fixation between the dental implant and the bone is of great importance and corresponds to compressive mechanical fixation that aims to prevent micromovement of the implant. The aim of this research was to determine the role of roughness and the type of dental implant (tissue-level or bone-level) in implant stability, measured using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and insertion torque (IT). We analyzed 234 titanium dental implants, placed in fresh calf ribs, at the half-tissue level and half-bone level. The implant surface was subjected to grit-blasting treatments with alumina particles of 120, 300, and 600 μm at a projection pressure of 2.5 bar, resulting in three types of roughness. Roughness was determined via optical interferometry. The wettability of the surfaces was also determined. Implant stability was measured using a high-precision torquemeter to obtain IT, and RFA was used to determine the implant stability quotient (ISQ). The results show that rough surfaces with Sa values of 0.5 to 4 μm do not affect the primary stability. However, the type of implant is important; bone-level implants obtained the highest primary stability values. A good correlation between the primary stability values obtained via IT and ISQ was demonstrated. New in vivo studies are necessary to know whether these results can be maintained in the long term.

[1]  A. Brizuela,et al.  Corrosion Resistance and Titanium Ion Release of Hybrid Dental Implants , 2023, Materials.

[2]  F. Pera,et al.  Immediate loading full-arch rehabilitation using transmucosal tissue-level implants with different variables associated: a one-year observational study. , 2023, Minerva dental and oral science.

[3]  G. Troiano,et al.  Marginal bone changes around platform-switched conical connection implants placed 1 or 2 mm subcrestally: A multicenter crossover randomized controlled trial. , 2023, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[4]  E. Valmaseda-Castellón,et al.  Effect of Implantoplasty on Roughness, Fatigue and Corrosion Behavior of Narrow Diameter Dental Implants , 2023, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[5]  G. Troiano,et al.  Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: Osseodensification drills versus piezoelectric surgery. A multi‐center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial , 2022, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[6]  E. Valmaseda-Castellón,et al.  Evaluation of the inflammatory and osteogenic response induced by titanium particles released during implantoplasty of dental implants , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[7]  F. Pera,et al.  One‐stage versus two‐stage technique using two splinted extra‐short implants: A multicentric split‐mouth study with a one‐year follow‐up , 2022, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[8]  J. Mena-Álvarez,et al.  Relevant Aspects of Titanium and Zirconia Dental Implants for Their Fatigue and Osseointegration Behaviors , 2022, Materials.

[9]  F. Hölzle,et al.  The primary stability of two dental implant systems in low-density bone. , 2022, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  M. Cerrolaza,et al.  Influence of Bone-Level Dental Implants Placement and of Cortical Thickness on Osseointegration: In Silico and In Vivo Analyses , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[11]  D. Torres-Lagares,et al.  Benefits of Residual Aluminum Oxide for Sand Blasting Titanium Dental Implants: Osseointegration and Bactericidal Effects , 2021, Materials.

[12]  Geraldo R M Matos Surface Roughness of Dental Implant and Osseointegration , 2020, Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery.

[13]  J. Ríos-Santos,et al.  Influence of Implant Design and Under-Preparation of the Implant Site on Implant Primary Stability. An In Vitro Study , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[14]  M. Punset,et al.  Antibacterial Properties of Triethoxysilylpropyl Succinic Anhydride Silane (TESPSA) on Titanium Dental Implants , 2020, Polymers.

[15]  M. Al-Sabbagh,et al.  Can Osseointegration Be Achieved Without Primary Stability? , 2019, Dental clinics of North America.

[16]  J. Ríos-Santos,et al.  Influence of a Novel Surface of Bioactive Implants on Osseointegration: A Comparative and Histomorfometric Correlation and Implant Stability Study in Minipigs , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[17]  G. Huynh-Ba,et al.  Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. , 2018, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  D. Cochran,et al.  How frequent does peri-implantitis occur? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[19]  K. Almas,et al.  Microthreaded Implants and Crestal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review , 2017, The Journal of oral implantology.

[20]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  Implant surface roughness and patient factors on long‐term peri‐implant bone loss , 2017, Periodontology 2000.

[21]  L. Monsalve-Guil,et al.  Importance of the Roughness and Residual Stresses of Dental Implants on Fatigue and Osseointegration Behavior. In Vivo Study in Rabbits. , 2016, The Journal of oral implantology.

[22]  F. Kloss,et al.  Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration , 2016, BioMed research international.

[23]  B. Boyan,et al.  Titanium surface characteristics, including topography and wettability, alter macrophage activation. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[24]  D. Rodriguez,et al.  Anhydride-functional silane immobilized onto titanium surfaces induces osteoblast cell differentiation and reduces bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[25]  Á. Álvarez-Arenal,et al.  Relationship Between Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Measurements, Performed by Resonance Frequency Analysis, in Micromobility of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study , 2015, Implant dentistry.

[26]  H. Rangé,et al.  Clinical evaluation of two dental implant macrostructures on peri-implant bone loss: a comparative, retrospective study. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[27]  I. Schechter,et al.  Cellular Responses Evoked by Different Surface Characteristics of Intraosseous Titanium Implants , 2015, BioMed research international.

[28]  J. Ríos-Santos,et al.  Advances in surfaces and osseointegration in implantology. Biomimetic surfaces , 2015, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[29]  Jong-Ho Lee,et al.  The influence of thread geometry on implant osseointegration under immediate loading: a literature review , 2014, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[30]  B. Boyan,et al.  A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and clinical aspects. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[31]  M. Herrero-Climent,et al.  Implant–abutment connections: influence of the design on the microgap and their fatigue and fracture behavior of dental implants , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[32]  I. Schechter,et al.  Osseointegration: biological events in relation to characteristics of the implant surface. , 2014, SADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging.

[33]  L. Scheideler,et al.  Wetting behavior of dental implants. , 2011, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[34]  Hom-Lay Wang,et al.  The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[35]  J. Jansen,et al.  Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[36]  C. Johansson,et al.  Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[37]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[38]  Carlos Nelson Elias,et al.  Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. , 2008, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[39]  Lars Sennerby,et al.  Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. , 2008, Periodontology 2000.

[40]  W Wagner,et al.  Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[41]  H. Duschner,et al.  Turned, machined versus double-etched dental implants in vivo. , 2007, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[42]  J. Jansen,et al.  Implant Surface Roughness and Bone Healing: a Systematic Review , 2006, Journal of dental research.

[43]  J. Jansen,et al.  The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[44]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Implant stability during initiation and resolution of experimental periimplantitis: an experimental study in the dog. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[45]  David L Cochran,et al.  Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[46]  M. Klingensmith,et al.  Patient Selection and Preparation , 2004 .

[47]  M W Bidez,et al.  Influence of hex geometry and prosthetic table width on static and fatigue strength of dental implants. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[48]  L Sennerby,et al.  Effects of barrier membranes on bone resorption and implant stability in onlay bone grafts. An experimental study. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[49]  D. Cochran,et al.  Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[50]  D Buser,et al.  Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[51]  N Meredith,et al.  Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[52]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[53]  O. J. Dunn Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums , 1964 .

[54]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[55]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[56]  C. Aparicio,et al.  Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[57]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .