Conditions affecting cell seeding onto three-dimensional scaffolds for cellular-based biodegradable implants.

Seeding cells efficiently and uniformly onto three-dimensional scaffolds is a key element for engineering tissues, particularly when only a low-number of cells is available for tissue repair and regeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate three seeding techniques on two biocompatible scaffolds in vitro using chondrocytes as follows: (1) static; (2) modified centrifugal cell immobilization (CCI); and (3) dynamic oscillating motion. Five milliliters of media containing 5, 10, or 25 million articular, auricular, or costal chondrocytes were used to seed porous PLGA scaffolds and sections of devitalized cartilage. The dynamic oscillating technique resulted in up to 150% higher cellular load at 7 days than CCI seeding. Cell distribution was more homogeneous throughout the scaffold under dynamic conditions versus more sporadic and dispersed cell concentrations on the scaffolds when using either the static or the modified CCI technique. Cell load and distribution, when using a low numbers of chondrocytes at one and two million cells per milliliter, was comparable to that using the much higher number, especially under dynamic seeding conditions. The seeded scaffolds were used as implants to achieve cellular bonding between two devitalized meniscus discs. The constructs were implanted subcutaneously in nude mice for 12 weeks and analyzed histologically. Implants seeded with auricular chondrocytes showed qualitative more integration into native meniscus tissue than articular and costal cell implants. We conclude the dynamic oscillating seeding technique is an efficient technique for seeding low-cell numbers onto scaffolds resulting in consistent and uniform cell distribution throughout porous PLGA scaffolds.

[1]  Simon P. Hoerstrup,et al.  Tissue Engineering of Functional Trileaflet Heart Valves From Human Marrow Stromal Cells , 2002, Circulation.

[2]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds , 2002, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[3]  D. Zaleske,et al.  Meniscal repair using engineered tissue , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  D. Zaleske,et al.  Bonding of cartilage matrices with cultured chondrocytes: An experimental model , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  B. Mandelbaum,et al.  Current Concepts Section , 2004 .

[6]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Microcirculation within grooved substrates regulates cell positioning and cell docking inside microfluidic channels. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[7]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Bioreactor studies of native and tissue engineered cartilage. , 2002, Biorheology.

[8]  Joseph P Vacanti,et al.  A novel pulsatile, laminar flow bioreactor for the development of tissue-engineered vascular structures. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[9]  K. Furukawa,et al.  Oscillatory perfusion seeding and culturing of osteoblast-like cells on porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds. , 2008, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A.

[10]  P. Ma,et al.  Optimization of Hepatocyte Spheroid Formation for Hepatic Tissue Engineering on Three-Dimensional Biodegradable Polymer within a Flow Bioreactor prior to Implantation , 2001, Cells Tissues Organs.

[11]  T. Gill,et al.  Cell-Based Therapy for Meniscal Repair , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  N Ohshima,et al.  Novel cell immobilization method utilizing centrifugal force to achieve high-density hepatocyte culture in porous scaffold. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  M. Tammi,et al.  Expression of reduced amounts of structurally altered aggrecan in articular cartilage chondrocytes exposed to high hydrostatic pressure. , 1994, The Biochemical journal.

[14]  Joo L. Ong,et al.  Diffusion in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Design Issues Related to Porosity, Permeability, Architecture, and Nutrient Mixing , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  R Langer,et al.  Modulation of the mechanical properties of tissue engineered cartilage. , 2000, Biorheology.

[16]  D R Carter,et al.  Effects of shear stress on articular chondrocyte metabolism. , 2000, Biorheology.

[17]  Y. Hirasawa,et al.  Hydrostatic pressur influences mRNA exprssion of trnsforming growth factor‐β1 and heat shock protein 70 in chondrocyte‐like cell line , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  B. Obradovic,et al.  Bioreactor cultivation conditions modulate the composition and mechanical properties of tissue‐engineered cartilage , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  R Langer,et al.  Dynamic Cell Seeding of Polymer Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering , 1998, Biotechnology progress.

[20]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Cultivation of cell‐polymer cartilage implants in bioreactors , 1993, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[21]  Thomas N Robinson,et al.  Cardiovascular Health in Childhood: A Statement for Health Professionals From the Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in the Young (AHOY) of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association , 2002, Circulation.

[22]  V. Mow,et al.  The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.