INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND TRAFFIC SAFETY - DRIVERS PERCEPTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC SPEED CHECKERS

Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) can play an important role in reducing risks and increasing traffic safety. Discussion as to whether a technological approach or a behavioral approach is the right way to achieve a safer traffic environment forms a point of departure for this paper. On the one hand, there are the technicians who emphasize technology as the way towards safer traffic. Behaviorists, on the other hand, view the drivers’ behavior as fundamental and argue that education and incentive-oriented policies are essential in order to influence the driver and therefore increase traffic safety. Independent of the approach advocated a successful outcome of either a technological improvement, or an information campaign, has to be based on a high level of acceptance among potential users. In order to increase traffic safety, it is therefore essential to recognize driver motivation and attitudes. In this paper we focus on drivers’ attitudes towards risk, traffic safety and safety measures. A study of drivers’ attitudes and acceptance of an electronic device for speed checking (which the drivers tested for nine months) indicated a high acceptance level. The drivers perceived that they had both become more aware of traffic regulations and behaved in accordance with safety regulations.

[1]  John D. Graham,et al.  Technology, behavior, and safety: An empirical study of automobile occupant-protection regulation , 1984 .

[2]  Julius Kuhl,et al.  Action Control: The Maintenance of Motivational States , 1987 .

[3]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Attitude prototypes as determinants of attitude-behavior consistency. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Alf Erling Risa Adverse Incentives from Improved Technology: Traffic Safety Regulation in Norway , 1994 .

[5]  Christopher Garbacz Do front-seat belt laws put rear-seat passengers at risk? , 1992 .

[6]  Grant W. Neeley,et al.  Legislating Traffic Safety: A Pooled Time Series Analysis , 1995 .

[7]  A. W. Wicker Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects. , 1969 .

[8]  John D. Graham,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation , 1984 .

[9]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[10]  P. Bentler,et al.  Attitudes "cause" behaviors: A structural equation analysis. , 1981 .

[11]  W. Evans,et al.  Risk reduction or risk compensation? The case of mandatory safety-belt use laws , 1991 .

[12]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[13]  Robert W. Crandall,et al.  Regulating the Automobile , 1986 .

[14]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[15]  G. Foxall Evidence for attitudinal-behavioural consistency: Implications for consumer research paradigms , 1984 .

[16]  John D. Graham,et al.  Automobile Safety Regulation and Offsetting Behavior: Some New Empirical Estimates , 1984 .

[17]  Peter D. Loeb,et al.  Effects of Policy-Related Variables on Traffic Fatalities: An Extreme Bounds Analysis Using Time-Series Data* , 1995 .

[18]  M. R. Solomon Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being , 1993 .

[19]  G Blomquist A utility maximization model of driver traffic safety behavior. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  S. Peltzman The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation , 1975, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[22]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[23]  Folke Ölander,et al.  Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection , 1995 .

[24]  N. Henley,et al.  Balance and the grouping schema. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Björn Lindgren,et al.  The Effects of Traffic Safety Regulation in Sweden , 1980, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Carol J. Williams,et al.  The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process , 1989 .

[27]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[28]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .