Effect of Pressure on Skin-Electrode Impedance in Wearable Biomedical Measurement Devices

Objective: This paper investigates the effect of applied pressure on the skin-electrode impedance. Applied pressure, which affects the skin-electrode impedance, can fluctuate in many acquisition setups, particularly in wearable devices. The skin-electrode impedance, in turn, impacts the quality of the recorded signal in biomedical monitoring devices. Methods: Three types of electrodes were examined: Ag/AgCl electrodes, conductive textile electrodes, and dry electrodes with surface microfeatures (Orbital Research Inc.). Impedance measurements were conducted as pressure was repeatedly applied ( $P = 4$ kPa) and removed ( $P = 0$ kPa) over several trials. A Cole–Cole impedance model was utilized to model the skin-electrode interface. Significance and Results: Results demonstrated large decreases in the skin-electrode impedance of dry electrodes (conductive textile and orbital electrodes), especially with the initial application of the pressure. Model parameters also proved to be highly dependent on the level of pressure in dry electrodes but less dependent and more stable in wet electrodes. Decreases in skin-electrode impedance associated with applied pressure were thought to be caused by an increased effective electrode contact area. Changes in skin-electrode impedance were irreversible, lasting even after the applied pressure was released. Differences skin-electrode impedance associated with changes in applied pressure, decreased as the number of trials increased. Conclusion: Applied pressure has larger effect on dry electrodes than wet electrodes. Wearable devices that employ dry electrodes may have poorer biomedical signal quality when initially donned; however, the advantage of wet electrodes with their lower sensitivity to applied pressure is diminished in long-term monitoring applications.

[1]  Cedric Assambo,et al.  Determination of the parameters of the skin-electrode impedance model for ECG measurement , 2007 .

[2]  R. V. Hill,et al.  Electrical impedance plethysmography: a critical analysis. , 1967, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  J. Webster,et al.  Minimizing Electrode Motion Artifact by Skin Abrasion , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Stig Ollmar,et al.  Electrical impedance measurements at different skin sites related to seasonal variations , 2000, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[5]  Ahmed S. Elwakil,et al.  Extracting the Cole-Cole impedance model parameters without direct impedance measurement , 2010 .

[6]  Carmen C. Y. Poon,et al.  Unobtrusive Sensing and Wearable Devices for Health Informatics , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  O. Corrigan,et al.  Electrical properties of human stratum corneum and transdermal drug transport , 1993 .

[8]  David H. Gordon,et al.  Triboelectric Interference in the ECG , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics , 2000 .

[10]  J. Lauter,et al.  Wearable approach for continuous ECG - and activity patient-monitoring , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Voicu Groza,et al.  Measuring skin-electrode impedance variation of conductive textile electrodes under pressure , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings.

[12]  John G. Webster,et al.  Medical Instrumentation: Application and Design , 1997 .

[13]  K. Cole,et al.  Dispersion and Absorption in Dielectrics I. Alternating Current Characteristics , 1941 .

[14]  Rosario Morello,et al.  A Smart ECG Measurement System Based on Web-Service-Oriented Architecture for Telemedicine Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[15]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Cole electrical impedance Model-a critique and an alternative , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  B R Eggins Skin contact electrodes for medical applications. , 1993, The Analyst.

[17]  J. Webster Reducing Motion Artifacts and Interference in Biopotential Recording , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  John G. Webster,et al.  Voltage-current characteristics of the electrotactile skin-electrode interface , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[19]  E. McAdams,et al.  Factors affecting electrode-gel-skin interface impedance in electrical impedance tomography , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[20]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Dry-Contact and Noncontact Biopotential Electrodes: Methodological Review , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  S. Grimnes Impedance measurement of individual skin surface electrodes , 1983, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[22]  L. Kirkup,et al.  A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating bioelectric recording electrodes. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[23]  P.S. Hamilton,et al.  Comparison of methods for adaptive removal of motion artifact , 2000, Computers in Cardiology 2000. Vol.27 (Cat. 00CH37163).

[24]  R. Edelberg,et al.  Relation of electrical properties of skin to structure and physiologic state. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[25]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[26]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  Skin Electrode Impedance of Textile Electrodes for Bioimpedance Spectroscopy , 2007 .

[27]  Tatsuma Yamamoto,et al.  Electrical properties of the epidermal stratum corneum , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[28]  L. E. Baker,et al.  The relationship between input impedance and electrode area in recording the ECG , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[29]  A. Baba,et al.  Time Based Measurement of the Impedance of the Skin-Electrode Interface for Dry Electrode ECG Recording , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[30]  L. A. Geddes,et al.  Historical evolution of circuit models for the electrode-electrolyte interface , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Roger C. Barr,et al.  Skin-electrode impedance and its effect on recording cardiac potentials , 1966 .

[32]  A. Chan,et al.  Surface Electromyographic Signals Using Dry Electrodes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[33]  K.-P. Hoffmann,et al.  Flexible dry surface-electrodes for ECG long-term monitoring , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Electrode-skin impedance changes due to an externally applied force , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications Proceedings.

[35]  L. Geddes,et al.  Temporal changes in electrode impedance while recording the electrocardiogram with “Dry” electrodes , 1973, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Luca Fanucci,et al.  Sensing Devices and Sensor Signal Processing for Remote Monitoring of Vital Signs in CHF Patients , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[37]  In Cheol Jeong,et al.  Compensation on Impedance of the Stratum Corneum , 2008 .

[38]  Voicu Groza,et al.  Impact of Skin–Electrode Interface on Electrocardiogram Measurements Using Conductive Textile Electrodes , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[39]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Non-obtrusive electrocardiogram system for the Smart Rollator , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications Proceedings.

[40]  Tomasz A. Kosierkiewicz,et al.  Dry and flexible elastomer electrodes outperform similar hydrogel and Ag/AgCl electrodes , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA).

[41]  J. Webster,et al.  The origin of skin-stretch-caused motion artifacts under electrodes. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[42]  A. Baba,et al.  Measurement of the electrical properties of ungelled ECG electrodes , 2008 .

[43]  J. Webster,et al.  Reducing skin potential motion artefact by skin abrasion , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.