Developments in scientific communication: Considerations on the value chain

This article analyses the transformation of the value chain of scientific information in response to concomitant changes in scientific research and education. The scientific communication market is described in terms of main driving forces and their interplay. These forces are the actor (author/reader), accessibility, content, and applicability pairs. Scientific communication is described in this article in terms of its four functions: registration, archive, awareness, and certification. The introduction of these forces and functions allows a structural analysis of the scientific communication market and allows us to discuss aspects of structural continuity in, e.g., describing the transformation from a paper-based system to communication in a digital environment. The developments are seen to emphasise the already existing autonomous development towards a “unified archive”, lead us to review certification policies to include elements external to research and lead us to consider new structures for scientific communication, and publications. The new structures can be seen to result from the interactions in the market as modelled by the forces and the functions. The distinction between formal and informal communication is seen to become less useful. The need to review the structure and organisation of the market becomes evident, in particular if we consider communication during research and education as well. This leads us to speculate whether elements of the virtual organisation are of relevance.

[1]  Arie Rip,et al.  The Computer Revolution in Science: Steps Towards the Realization of Computer-Supported Discovery Environments , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  The future of the quality assurance system: its impact on the social and professional recognition of scientists in the era of electronic publishing , 1997, J. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Hans-Dieter Daniel,et al.  Guardians of science , 1993 .

[4]  J. Ziman Pipers and Tunes in Science. (Book Reviews: Prometheus Bound. Science in a Dynamic Steady State.) , 2005 .

[5]  Andrew M. Odlyzko,et al.  Tragic Loss or Good Riddance? The Impending Demise of Traditional Scholary Journals , 1996, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[6]  Nicolaas Mars,et al.  Computer-Supported Resolution of Measurement Conflicts: A Case-Study in Materials Science , 1999 .

[7]  Joost Kircz,et al.  Modularity: the next form of scientific information presentation? , 1998, J. Documentation.

[8]  Nicolaas Mars,et al.  Condorcet query engine: a query engine for coordinated index terms , 1999 .

[9]  Michael E. Gorman Psychology of Science , 1996 .

[10]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Semi-Quantitative Comparative Analysis , 1999, IJCAI.

[11]  Jeff Rothenberg,et al.  Ensuring the Longevity of Digital Documents , 1995 .

[12]  P. Geurts,et al.  Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay , 1997 .

[13]  Hans E. Roosendaal,et al.  Estimating the Direction of Innovative Change Based on Theory and Mixed Methods , 2001 .

[14]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[15]  F.A.P. Harmsze A modular structure for scientific articles in an electronic environment , 2000 .

[16]  Alan G. Gross,et al.  The rhetoric of science , 1990 .

[17]  Bill Readings,et al.  The university in ruins , 1996 .

[18]  Marti A. Hearst Interfaces for Searching the Web , 1997, Scientific American.

[19]  Betty Collis,et al.  Tele-Learning in a Digital World: The Future of Distance Learning , 1996 .

[20]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Comparative envisionment construction: A technique for the comparative analysis of dynamical systems , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Antinus Nijholt,et al.  Speech and Language Interaction in a Web Theatre Environment , 1999 .

[22]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .