Three port versus four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a prospective study

Introduction: Cholelithiasis is the most common and important cause of biliary tract disease. In today’s world, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for gallstones. Decrease in the size or number of ports provide better results in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Objective: We aim the study to find out feasibility of three port lap cholecystectomy over four port lap cholecystectomy regarding post-op pain, duration of surgery, conversion rate, hospital stay and complications. Materials & Methods: Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. 76 patients enrolled for the study and divided into two groups as 3 port and 4 port. Surgical preformed assessment proforma used to collect the data. Results: The mean age of the studied patients was 46.38 years with female preponderance. The Mean operative time for three ports was 66.90 minutes and for four ports it was 75.45 minutes. Mean duration of post-operative stay for three port was 4.66 and for the conventional group it was 5.30. Conclusion: Patients who underwent the three port technique had a lesser hospital stay compared to patients who underwent the conventional 4 port technique. Patients had less postoperative pain, lesser requirement of analgesics in three port group. 2 patients from the 4 port group had fever 48 hours after surgery.

[1]  R. Mohanty,et al.  Pre-Operative Prediction of Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Clinical and Ultrasonographic Parameters , 2017 .

[2]  M. A. O. Ignacio,et al.  How to cite this article , 2016 .

[3]  M. Akhtar,et al.  A clinical study: prevalence and management of cholelithiasis , 2014 .

[4]  C. A. Singh,et al.  A study of three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2013 .

[5]  A. Gaharwar Factors Favouring Cholelithiasis in North Indian Population , 2013 .

[6]  Kehu Yang,et al.  Three-Port Versus Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials , 2009, World Journal of Surgery.

[7]  A. Hussain,et al.  Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Can Be Safely Performed in a Resource-Limited Setting: the First 49 Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies in Yemen , 2008, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[8]  M. Kumar,et al.  Three-Port Versus Standard Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in a Community-Based Teaching Hospital in Eastern Nepal , 2007, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[9]  İ. Barut,et al.  Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 2007, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[10]  Wu Ji,et al.  Role of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the treatment of complicated cholecystitis. , 2006, Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT.

[11]  D. Kauvar,et al.  Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 2006, The Journal of surgical research.

[12]  K. Slim,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An original three-trocar technique , 1995, World Journal of Surgery.

[13]  F. Giuliante,et al.  [The risk of biliary ductal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. , 2004, Journal de chirurgie.

[14]  S. Trichak Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[15]  J. Marescaux,et al.  Safety of Laparoscopic Approach for Acute Cholecystitis: Retrospective Study of 609 Cases , 2001, World Journal of Surgery.

[16]  M. Schäfer,et al.  Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[17]  K. Ido,et al.  Prospective study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in two hundred and fifty patients. , 1992, Endoscopy.

[18]  J. Sanabria,et al.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. , 1992, Surgery.

[19]  G. Berci,et al.  Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era. A standard for comparison. , 1992, Archives of surgery.

[20]  Y. Dion,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of 60 cases. , 1990, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[21]  L. Barbara,et al.  A population study on the prevalence of gallstone disease: The sirmione study , 1987, Hepatology.

[22]  J. B. Ganey,et al.  Cholecystectomy: clinical experience with a large series. , 1986, American journal of surgery.

[23]  S. Malhotra Epidemiological study of cholelithiasis among railroad workers in India with special reference to causation. , 1968, Gut.