Toward an Improvement in the Identification of Bridge Deck Flutter Derivatives

This paper presents a short review of the state-of-the-art methods to identify bridge deck flutter derivatives and proposes a new algorithm to simultaneously extract the aeroelastic coefficients from free-vibration section-model tests, which is based on the improvement of the unifying least-squares (ULS) method and is therefore called modified unifying least-squares method. The advantages with respect to ULS are the faster and better convergence and the improvement in accuracy due to the introduction of weighting factors in the unifying error function. The method has been validated through numerically simulated noisy signals and experimental heaving and pitching time histories for two different bridge deck cross sections: a single-box and a multiple-box girder section model. The analysis of the artificial signals shows that a few system parameters are very difficult to be identified due to the fact that the problem is strongly ill-conditioned. Nevertheless, all the diagonal and off-diagonal components of the stiffness and damping matrices which significantly contribute to the output of the system are correctly estimated. The improvement with respect to other methods is extensively discussed. For the wind-tunnel test cases the accuracy of the identification procedure is evaluated through the comparison between measured signals and those simulated through the estimated mechanical and aerodynamic system parameters with very satisfactory results. With respect to many previous attempts of validation, this approach clearly shows the degree of accuracy that can be expected from the identification algorithm. Finally, for the considered test cases the linear model which stands behind the method seems to be an acceptable approximation of the physics of the phenomenon.

[1]  Hitoshi Yamada,et al.  Measurement of Aerodynamic Coefficients by System identification methods , 1992 .

[2]  Erik Hjorth-Hansen,et al.  Determination of the aerodynamic derivatives by a system identification method , 1995 .

[3]  K. McKee Book Reviews : Wind Effects On Structures: E. Simiu and R.H. Scanlan John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York 1980, $33.50 , 1981 .

[4]  Shizhong Qiang,et al.  Weighting ensemble least-square method for flutter derivatives of bridge decks , 2003 .

[5]  Claudio Mannini,et al.  Flutter Vulnerability Assessment of Flexible Bridges , 2008 .

[6]  N. P. Jones,et al.  Identification of aeroelastic parameters of flexible bridges , 1994 .

[7]  Partha P. Sarkar,et al.  NEW IDENTIFICATION METHODS APPLIED TO THE RESPONSE OF FLEXIBLE BRIDGES TO WIND. , 1992 .

[8]  Gianni Bartoli ... et. al. Perfomance of wind exposed structures : results of the PERBACCO project , 2006 .

[9]  Haifan Xiang,et al.  Parametric study on flutter derivatives of bridge decks , 2001 .

[10]  Niels Kjølstad Poulsen,et al.  Determination of flutter derivatives for the great belt bridge , 1992 .

[11]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  AIR FOIL AND BRIDGE DECK FLUTTER DERIVATIVES , 1971 .

[12]  Gianni Bartoli,et al.  Performance of Wind Exposed Structures , 2006 .

[13]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Forced motion and free motion aeroelastic tests on a new concept dynamometric section model of the Messina suspension bridge , 2004 .

[14]  E. C. Mikulcik,et al.  A method for the direct identification of vibration parameters from the free response , 1977 .

[15]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  Multimode coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi-Kaikyo bridge , 1999 .

[16]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  A methodology for the experimental extraction of indicial functions for streamlined and bluff deck sections , 2003 .

[17]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Flutter derivatives identification through full bridge aeroelastic model transfer function analysis , 1996 .

[18]  Ming Gu,et al.  Direct identification of flutter derivatives and aerodynamic admittances of bridge decks , 2004 .

[19]  M. Matsumoto,et al.  AERODYNAMIC DAMPING OF PRISMS , 1996 .

[20]  Claudio Borri,et al.  Time-domain buffeting simulations for wind–bridge interaction , 2007 .

[21]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  COUPLED FLUTTER AND BUFFETING ANALYSIS OF LONG-SPAN BRIDGES , 1996 .

[22]  T. Theodorsen General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[23]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Revisiting Multimode Coupled Bridge Flutter: Some New Insights , 2006 .

[24]  Gianni Bartoli,et al.  Flutter mechanism for rectangular prisms in smooth and turbulent flow , 2006 .

[25]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Identification of flutter derivatives of bridge deck from free vibration data , 1995 .

[26]  Haifan Xiang,et al.  Identification of 18 Flutter Derivatives of Bridge Decks , 2000 .

[27]  Arindam Gan Chowdhury,et al.  Experimental identification of rational function coefficients for time-domain flutter analysis , 2005 .

[28]  Gianni Bartoli,et al.  A simplified approach to bridge deck flutter , 2008 .

[29]  Q C Li MEASURING FLUTTER DERIVATIVES FOR BRIDGE SECTIONAL MODELS IN WATER CHANNEL. DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE , 1995 .

[30]  Arindam Gan Chowdhury,et al.  A new technique for identification of eighteen flutter derivatives using a three-degree-of-freedom section model , 2003 .