Numerical Modelling of the Effects of Liquefaction on the Upheaval Buckling of Offshore Pipelines Using the PM4Sand Model

The buckling tendency of an offshore pipeline buried in a liquefiable soil aggravates under earthquake situations. Moreover, to understand the upheaval displacement behavior of an offshore pipeline under dynamic loading, it is crucial to understand the variation of liquefaction potential within the soil bed. Thus, in the present study, the variation of the liquefaction potential within the soil body and its effect on the pipeline upheaval displacement (u) and post-shake uplift resistance (Vup) is investigated using a finite element package called PLAXIS 2D. The study was performed for different seismic and soil conditions. To define the soil, two advanced constitutive models are used. The static stages are modelled with the ‘Hardening Soil Model with small strain’ (HSS model), while the dynamic stage is modelled with the PM4Sand model. Moreover, the problem is defined as a 2d plane strain problem. The pipe is considered to be covered with Nevada sand. Several parameters such as a sand-density index (Dr), pipe embedment depth (H), seismic frequency (f) and amplitude are varied to study the variation of the soil liquefaction potential, the pipe upheaval buckling and the post-shake uplift resistance. The model is validated with past studies and a considerable match is obtained. The liquefaction potential is shown using the shadings of a user-defined parameter called a pore water pressure ratio (ru). Moreover, the variation of pipe upheaval displacement (u) and pipe uplift resistance (Vup) are shown using various plots. Thus, it is observed that the liquefaction potential is reduced with an increase in the frequency and the amplitude of the seismic signal. Moreover, the peak upheaval buckling, and the duration of earthquake loading to reach the peak upheaval buckling, decreased with an increase in the earthquake signal frequency. Again, the variation of post-peak uplift resistance of the buried pipeline with the pipe embedment depth is observed to be independent of the signal parameters. However, the variation of uplift resistance of the pipeline with the soil relative density is influenced by the signal parameters.

[1]  D. Kong.  Quantifying Residual Resistance of Light Pipelines during Large-Amplitude Lateral Displacement Using Sequential Limit Analysis , 2022, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.

[2]  N. Dinesh,et al.  Performance evaluation of PM4Sand model for simulation of the liquefaction remedial measures for embankment , 2022, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[3]  F. T. Pinto,et al.  Buckling Mechanism of Offshore Pipelines: A State of the Art , 2021, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.

[4]  J. T. Shahu,et al.  Lateral and Uplift Capacity of Pipeline Buried in Seabed of Homogeneous Clay , 2021 .

[5]  F. T. Pinto,et al.  Offshore pipeline buried in Indian coastal clay: buckling behaviour analysis , 2021, Ships and Offshore Structures.

[6]  Baokui Chen,et al.  Influence of site factors on offshore ground motions: Observed Results and Numerical Simulation , 2021 .

[7]  J. T. Shahu,et al.  Uplift and lateral buckling failure mechanisms of offshore pipes buried in normally consolidated clay , 2021 .

[8]  José A.F.O. Correia,et al.  Editorial: Advanced research on offshore structures and foundation design: part 1 , 2019, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Maritime Engineering.

[9]  Massimina Castiglia.  The experimental study of buried onshore pipelines seismic-liquefaction induced vertical displacement in shaking table tests and its remedial measures , 2019 .

[10]  Asskar Janalizadeh Choobbasti,et al.  Prediction of Liquefaction Potential of Sandy Soil around a Submarine Pipeline under Earthquake Loading , 2019, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice.

[11]  I. Moore,et al.  Uplift Failure Mechanisms of Pipes Buried in Dense Sand , 2018, International Journal of Geomechanics.

[12]  J. Bray,et al.  Seismic performance of a building affected by moderate liquefaction during the Christchurch earthquake , 2017 .

[13]  Katerina Ziotopoulou,et al.  Seismic response of liquefiable sloping ground: Class A and C numerical predictions of centrifuge model responses , 2017, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[14]  Menglan Duan,et al.  Perturbation analysis for upheaval buckling of imperfect buried pipelines based on nonlinear pipe-soil interaction , 2017 .

[15]  Deepankar Choudhury,et al.  Generalized framework to predict undrained uplift capacity of buried offshore pipelines1 , 2016 .

[16]  Ren-peng Chen,et al.  Uplift tests on full-scale pipe segment in lumpy soft clay backfill , 2016 .

[17]  H. Sharafi,et al.  Seismic simulation of liquefaction-induced uplift behavior of buried pipelines in shallow ground , 2016, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[18]  Hao Xiong,et al.  Laboratory tests and thermal buckling analysis for pipes buried in Bohai soft clay , 2015 .

[19]  Hongnan Li,et al.  Characteristics of Earthquake Ground Motion on the Seafloor , 2015 .

[20]  D. Robert,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Study of Uplift Mobilization of Buried Pipelines in Sands , 2015 .

[21]  Peng Lin,et al.  Uplifting Behavior of Shallow Buried Pipe in Liquefiable Soil by Dynamic Centrifuge Test , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[22]  Shuwang Yan,et al.  Numerical studies on global buckling of subsea pipelines , 2014 .

[23]  Shuwang Yan,et al.  Model Test Studies on Soil Restraint to Pipeline Buried in Bohai Soft Clay , 2013 .

[24]  P. Sbarra,et al.  Earthquake sound perception , 2012 .

[25]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Effect of buried depth and diameter on uplift of underground structures in liquefied soils , 2012 .

[26]  N. Hataf,et al.  Uplift response of buried pipelines in saturated sand deposit under earthquake loading , 2011 .

[27]  Run Liu,et al.  Model test based soil spring model and application in pipeline thermal buckling analysis , 2011 .

[28]  Mohammad Azadi,et al.  Analyses of the effect of seismic behavior of shallow tunnels in liquefiable grounds , 2010 .

[29]  Guo Ying,et al.  Numerical analysis of liquefaction of porous seabed around pipeline fixed in space under seismic loading , 2009 .

[30]  Mark Randolph,et al.  The ultimate undrained resistance of partially embedded pipelines , 2008 .

[31]  Toshinori Kawabata,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF PIPE BURIED IN SATURATED SOIL DEPOSIT SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE LOADING , 2008 .

[32]  S. V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Estimation of Uplift Capacity of Rapidly Loaded Plate Anchors in Soft Clay , 2007 .

[33]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Soil restraint on buckling oil and gas pipelines buried in lumpy clay fill , 2007 .

[34]  T. Newson,et al.  Finite Element Modelling of Upheaval Buckling of Buried offshore Pipelines in Clayey Soils , 2006 .

[35]  C. Y. Cheuk,et al.  Deformation mechanisms during uplift of buried pipes in sand , 2005 .

[36]  T. Kawabata,et al.  CENTRIFUGAL MODELING OF SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF LARGE-DIAMETER PIPE IN LIQUEFIABLE SOIL , 2003 .

[37]  B. J. Hsieh,et al.  A study of liquefaction related damages on shield tunnels , 2001 .

[38]  J. D. Geddes,et al.  Uplift of Anchor Plates in Sand , 1987 .

[39]  M. Randolph,et al.  The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil , 1984 .

[40]  Paul S. Bell,et al.  Marine Renewable Energy , 2021, Developing the Blue Economy.

[41]  S. Rios,et al.  Prediction of time of liquefaction using kinetic and strain energy , 2020 .

[42]  DuttaSujan,et al.  Finite element modeling of partially embedded pipelines in clay seabed using Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian method , 2015 .

[43]  H. Sabetamal,et al.  Finite element algorithms for dynamic analysis of geotechnical problems | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2015 .

[44]  Aikaterini Katerina Ziotopoulou,et al.  A Sand Plasticity Model for Earthquake Engineering Applications , 2012 .

[45]  闫澍旺,et al.  Model Test Based Soil Spring Model and Application in Pipeline Thermal Buckling Analysis , 2011 .

[46]  S. El-gharbawy.  Uplift Capacity of Buried Offshore Pipelines , 2006 .

[47]  Anshel J. Schiff,et al.  Northridge earthquake : lifeline performance and post-earthquake response , 1995 .

[48]  G.J.M. Schotman,et al.  Soil Response for Pipeline Upheaval Buckling Analyses: Full-Scale Laboratory Tests and Modelling , 1990 .

[49]  L.R.L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic responses of buried pipelines during a liquefaction process , 1990 .

[50]  Jørgen Juncher Jensen,et al.  UPHEAVAL CREEP OF BURIED HEATED PIPELINES WITH INITIAL IMPERFECTIONS , 1988 .

[51]  G.J.M. Schotman,et al.  PIPE-SOIL INTERACTION: A MODEL FOR LATERALLY LOADED PIPELINES IN CLAY , 1987 .

[52]  Masaru Kitaura,et al.  Response analysis of buried pipelines considering rise of ground water table in liquefaction processes. , 1987 .