Comparison of the early stages of forced unfolding for fibronectin type III modules

The structural changes accompanying stretch-induced early unfolding events were investigated for the four type III fibronectin (FN-III) modules, FN-III7, FN-III8, FN-III9, and FN-III10 by using steered molecular dynamics. Simulations revealed that two main energy barriers, I and II, have to be overcome to initiate unraveling of FN-III's tertiary structure. In crossing the first barrier, the two opposing β-sheets of FN-III are rotated against each other such that the β-strands of both β-sheets align parallel to the force vector (aligned state). All further events in the unfolding pathway proceed from this intermediate state. A second energy barrier has to be overcome to break the first major cluster of hydrogen bonds between adjacent β-strands. Simulations revealed that the height of barrier I varied significantly among the four modules studied, being largest for FN-III7 and lowest for FN-III10, whereas the height of barrier II showed little variation. Key residues affecting the mechanical stability of FN-III modules were identified. These results suggest that FN-III modules can be prestretched into an intermediate state with only minor changes to their tertiary structures. FN-III10, for example, extends 12 Å from the native “twisted” to the intermediate aligned state, and an additional 10 Å from the aligned state to further unfolding where the first β-strand is peeled away. The implications of the existence of intermediate states regarding the elasticity of fibrillar fibers and the stretch-induced exposure of cryptic sites are discussed.

[1]  S. Smith,et al.  Folding-unfolding transitions in single titin molecules characterized with laser tweezers. , 1997, Science.

[2]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-mediated Contractility Exposes a Cryptic Site in Fibronectin and Induces Fibronectin Matrix Assembly , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  S. Aota,et al.  Formation of amyloid-like fibrils by self-association of a partially unfolded fibronectin type III module. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  I D Campbell,et al.  Module-module interactions in the cell binding region of fibronectin: stability, flexibility and specificity. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Mechanical unfolding intermediates in titin modules , 1999, Nature.

[6]  Andreas Janshoff,et al.  Conformational Analysis of Native Fibronectin by Means of Force Spectroscopy , 2000 .

[7]  K Schulten,et al.  Reconstructing potential energy functions from simulated force-induced unbinding processes. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[8]  H. Erickson,et al.  Dynamics and elasticity of the fibronectin matrix in living cell culture visualized by fibronectin-green fluorescent protein. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  K Schulten,et al.  Forced unfolding of the fibronectin type III module reveals a tensile molecular recognition switch. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[11]  P. McKeown-Longo,et al.  A novel role for the integrin-binding III-10 module in fibronectin matrix assembly , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  M Karplus,et al.  Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: an analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  K. Schulten,et al.  Unfolding of titin immunoglobulin domains by steered molecular dynamics simulation. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[14]  H. Gaub,et al.  Unfolding forces of titin and fibronectin domains directly measured by AFM. , 2000, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[15]  J. Clarke,et al.  Mechanical and chemical unfolding of a single protein: a comparison. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  K. Schulten,et al.  The key event in force-induced unfolding of Titin's immunoglobulin domains. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[17]  E. Evans,et al.  Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  X-PLOR Version 3.1: A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR , 1992 .

[19]  V. Vogel,et al.  Self-assembly of fibronectin into fibrillar networks underneath dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine monolayers: role of lipid matrix and tensile forces. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  P. McKeown-Longo,et al.  Activation of Distinct α5β1-mediated Signaling Pathways by Fibronectin's Cell Adhesion and Matrix Assembly Domains , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  H. Erickson,et al.  Reversible unfolding of fibronectin type III and immunoglobulin domains provides the structural basis for stretch and elasticity of titin and fibronectin. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  I D Campbell,et al.  A comparison of the folding kinetics and thermodynamics of two homologous fibronectin type III modules. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  H Li,et al.  Atomic force microscopy reveals the mechanical design of a modular protein. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Andres F. Oberhauser,et al.  The molecular elasticity of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin , 1998, Nature.

[26]  K. Schulten,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics simulations of force‐induced protein domain unfolding , 1999, Proteins.

[27]  E. Cota,et al.  Folding of beta‐sandwich proteins: Three‐state transition of a fibronectin type III module , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  S. Brew,et al.  Cryptic Self-association Sites in Type III Modules of Fibronectin* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  Andres F. Oberhauser,et al.  Point mutations alter the mechanical stability of immunoglobulin modules , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[30]  R. Hynes,et al.  The dynamic dialogue between cells and matrices: implications of fibronectin's elasticity. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M Karplus,et al.  Unfolding proteins by external forces and temperature: the importance of topology and energetics. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics simulation of conformational changes of immunoglobulin domain I27 interprete atomic force microscopy observations , 1999 .

[33]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[34]  M. Rief,et al.  The mechanical stability of immunoglobulin and fibronectin III domains in the muscle protein titin measured by atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[35]  K. Ingham,et al.  Interactions between type III domains in the 110 kDa cell-binding fragment of fibronectin. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Harold P. Erickson,et al.  2.0 Å Crystal Structure of a Four-Domain Segment of Human Fibronectin Encompassing the RGD Loop and Synergy Region , 1996, Cell.

[37]  K. Schulten,et al.  Molecular dynamics study of unbinding of the avidin-biotin complex. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[38]  J. Richardson,et al.  β-Sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins , 1977, Nature.