PV System Performance Evaluation by Clustering Production Data to Normal and Non-Normal Operation

The most common method for assessment of a photovoltaic (PV) system performance is by comparing its energy production to reference data (irradiance or neighboring PV system). Ideally, at normal operation, the compared sets of data tend to show a linear relationship. Deviations from this linearity are mainly due to malfunctions occurring in the PV system or data input anomalies: a significant number of measurements (named as outliers) may not fulfill this, and complicate a proper performance evaluation. In this paper a new data analysis method is introduced which allows to automatically distinguish the measurements that fit to a near-linear relationship from those which do not (outliers). Although it can be applied to any scatter-plot, where the sets of data tend to be linear, it is specifically used here for two different purposes in PV system monitoring: (1) to detect and exclude any data input anomalies; and (2) to detect and separate measurements where the PV system is functioning properly from the measurements characteristic for malfunctioning. Finally, the data analysis method is applied in four different cases, either with precise reference data (pyranometer and neighboring PV system) or with scattered reference data (in plane irradiance obtained from application of solar models on satellite observations).

[1]  Jay Johnson,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of Catastrophic Faults in PV Arrays: Types, Detection, and Mitigation Techniques , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[2]  Ricardo Aler,et al.  Improving the separation of direct and diffuse solar radiation components using machine learning by gradient boosting , 2017 .

[3]  Jonathan Leloux,et al.  Review of the performance of residential PV systems in Belgium , 2012 .

[4]  Jonathan Leloux,et al.  Review of the Performance of Residential PV systems in France , 2012 .

[5]  Lucas Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Prediction of global irradiance on inclined surfaces from horizontal global irradiance , 1999 .

[6]  Aissa Chouder,et al.  Automatic fault detection in grid connected PV systems , 2013 .

[7]  L. Narvarte,et al.  Analysis of the state of the art of PV systems in Europe , 2015 .

[8]  Adrien Desportes,et al.  Monitoring 30,000 PV Systems in Europe: Performance, Faults, and State of the Art , 2015 .

[9]  C. Gueymard Direct and indirect uncertainties in the prediction of tilted irradiance for solar engineering applications , 2009 .

[10]  J. Hay Calculating solar radiation for inclined surfaces: Practical approaches , 1993 .

[11]  Iea Pvps,et al.  Analytical Monitoring of Grid-connected Photovoltaic Systems , 2014 .

[12]  Dazhi Yang,et al.  Evaluation of transposition and decomposition models for converting global solar irradiance from tilted surface to horizontal in tropical regions , 2013 .

[13]  Radu Platon,et al.  Online Fault Detection in PV Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[14]  Liesje De Boeck,et al.  A method for detecting malfunctions in PV solar panels based on electricity production monitoring , 2017 .

[15]  P. Moraitis,et al.  Counting the Sun - a Dutch public awareness campaign on PV performance , 2014 .

[16]  Mehdi Shahrestani,et al.  A method of strategic evaluation of energy performance of Building Integrated Photovoltaic in the urban context , 2018 .

[17]  Jay Johnson,et al.  PV faults: Overview, modeling, prevention and detection techniques , 2013, 2013 IEEE 14th Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL).

[18]  Wilfried van Sark,et al.  Outdoor characterization and comparison of string and MLPE under clear and partially shaded conditions , 2015 .

[19]  S. Firth,et al.  A Simple Model of PV System Performance and its Use in Fault Detection , 2010 .

[20]  W.G.J.H.M. van Sark,et al.  A comprehensive study on partial shading response of c-Si modules and yield modeling of string inverter and module level power electronics , 2016 .

[21]  E. Maxwell A quasi-physical model for converting hourly global horizontal to direct normal insolation , 1987 .

[22]  Björn Müller,et al.  Performance Ratio Revisited: Are PR >90% Realistic? , 2011 .

[23]  J. Duffie,et al.  Estimation of the diffuse radiation fraction for hourly, daily and monthly-average global radiation , 1982 .

[24]  Christian Reise,et al.  Performance ratio revisited: is PR > 90% realistic? , 2011 .

[25]  John A. Davies,et al.  Evaluation of selected models for estimating solar radiation on horizontal surfaces , 1989 .

[26]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[27]  Rustu Eke,et al.  Monitoring the performance of single and triple junction amorphous silicon modules in two building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) installations , 2013 .

[28]  P. Ineichen,et al.  A new simplified version of the perez diffuse irradiance model for tilted surfaces , 1987 .

[29]  P. Ineichen,et al.  Dynamic global-to-direct irradiance conversion models , 1992 .

[30]  Vittorio Ferraro,et al.  Experimental testing of models for the estimation of hourly solar radiation on vertical surfaces at Arcavacata di Rende , 2007 .

[31]  W. V. Sark,et al.  Three years experience in a Dutch public awareness campaign on photovoltaic system performance , 2017 .

[32]  Saeed Lotfifard,et al.  Modeling and Health Monitoring of DC Side of Photovoltaic Array , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.