Translation universals: do they exist? A corpus-based NLP study of convergence and simplification

Convergence and simplification are two of the so-called universals in translation studies. The first one postulates that translated texts tend to be more similar than nontranslated texts. The second one postulates that translated texts are simpler, easier-tounderstand than non-translated ones. This paper discusses the results of a project which applies NLP techniques over comparable corpora of translated and nontranslated texts in Spanish seeking to establish whether these two universals hold Corpas Pastor (2008).

[1]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation among University Spoken and Written Registers: A New Multi-Dimensional Analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Charles A. Ferguson,et al.  Language structure and language use , 1971 .

[3]  R. Flesch.  A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  M. Coleman,et al.  A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. , 1975 .

[5]  Mona Baker,et al.  Corpus-based Translation Studies: The Challenges that Lie Ahead , 1996 .

[6]  Timo Järvinen,et al.  A non-projective dependency parser , 1997, ANLP.

[7]  Brett Kessler,et al.  Book Reviews: The Significance of Word Lists , 2001, CL.

[8]  W. Wiersma,et al.  A Measure of Aggregate Syntactic Distance , 2006 .

[9]  Gloria Corpas Pastor.  Investigar con corpus en traducción: los retos de un nuevo paradigma , 2008 .

[10]  Erhard W. Hinrichs,et al.  Linguistic Distances , 2006 .

[11]  Mona Baker.  Corpus-Based Translation Studies* , 1996, Researching Translation in the Age of Technology and Global Conflict.

[12]  Lisette García Moya,et al.  Translation universals : do they exist ? A corpus-based and NLP approach to convergence , 2008 .

[13]  Mona Baker,et al.  'Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies: Implications and Applications' , 1993 .

[14]  Gideon Toury,et al.  Descriptive translation studies and beyond , 1995 .

[15]  Sara Laviosa,et al.  Corpus-based Translation Studies: Theory, Findings, Applications , 2002 .

[16]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison , 1995 .

[17]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .