论文信息 - Fraud and the editor

Fraud and the editor

Considers how improving the ethics of publication might help to diminish the amount of misconduct in medical research, and the role of the journal editor both in prevention and in setting the record straight.

Stephen Lock | S. Lock

[1] R. Fletcher,et al. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. , 1990, JAMA.

[2] P. Friedman,et al. Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication. , 1990, JAMA.

[3] A. Flanagin,et al. New requirements for authors: signed statements of authorship responsibility and financial disclosure. , 1989, JAMA.

[4] D. Koshland. Fraud in science. , 1987, Science.

[5] Andrew M. Colman,et al. Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias? , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6] J. Wyngaarden,et al. Colloquium on Scientific Authorship: Rights and Responsibilities , 1989, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[7] D. Rennie. Editors and auditors. , 1989, JAMA.

[8] R. Merton,et al. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system , 1971 .

[9] W. W. Stewart,et al. The integrity of the scientific literature , 1987, Nature.