A systematic review of wheelchair skills tests for manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury: towards a standardized outcome measure

Objective: To review, analyse, evaluate and critically appraise available wheelchair skill tests in the international literature and to determine the need for a standardized measurement tool of manual wheeled mobility in those with spinal cord injury. Data sources: A systematic review of literature (databases PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (1970-December 2009). Subjects: Hand rim wheelchair users, mainly those with spinal cord injury. Review methods: Studies’ content and methodology were analysed qualitatively. Study quality was assessed using the scale of Gardner and Altman. Results: Thirteen studies fell within the inclusion criteria and were critically reviewed. The 13 studies covered 11 tests, which involved 14 different skills. These 14 skills were categorized into: wheelchair manoeuvring and basic daily living skills; obstacle-negotiating skills; wheelie tasks; and transfers. The Wheelchair Skills Test version 2.4 (WST-2.4) and Wheelchair Circuit tests scored best on the Gardner and Altman scale, the Obstacle Course Assessment of Wheelchair User Performances (OCAWUP) test was found to be the most relevant for daily needs in a wheelchair. The different tests used different measurement scales, varying from binary to ordinal and continuous. Comparison of outcomes between tests was not possible because of differences in skills assessed, measurement scales, environment and equipment selected for each test. A lack of information regarding protocols as well as differences in terminology was also detected. Conclusion: This systematic review revealed large inconsistencies among the current available wheelchair skill tests. This makes it difficult to compare study results and to create norms and standards for wheelchair skill performance.

[1]  Nancy E Mayo,et al.  Upper-limb function and recovery in the acute phase poststroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  T Mills,et al.  Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) instrument , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  M. Rodgers,et al.  Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  Serafino Buono,et al.  ICF- INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH , 2003 .

[5]  Sylvie Nadeau,et al.  Reliability and construct validity studies of an obstacle course assessment of wheelchair user performance , 2005, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[6]  Claudine Auger,et al.  Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  A Liberati,et al.  Functional status in patients with spinal cord injury: a new standardized measurement scale. Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Interventi Riabilitativi. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  A. Schrijvers,et al.  Services for spinal cord injured: availability and satisfaction , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[9]  Luc P De Witte,et al.  The Wheelchair Circuit: Construct validity and responsiveness of a test to assess manual wheelchair mobility in persons with spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[10]  G Cottam,et al.  Wheelchair obstacle course performance in right cerebral vascular accident victims. , 1989, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[11]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Reliability. ERIC Digest. , 2001 .

[12]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Physical capacity and walking ability after lower limb amputation: a systematic review , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[13]  S. Haley,et al.  Description and Interobserver Reliability of the Tufts Assessment of Motor Performance , 1988, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[14]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  The wheelchair circuit: reliability of a test to assess mobility in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Krista L Best,et al.  The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  L. Harvey,et al.  Reliability of a tool for assessing mobility in wheelchair-dependent paraplegics , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[18]  H J Montoye,et al.  The assessment of physical activity by questionnaire. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  M. E. Cress,et al.  Physical functional performance in persons using a manual wheelchair. , 2002, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[20]  Mark Schmeler,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability and Cross Validation of the Functioning Everyday With a Wheelchair Instrument , 2007, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[21]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Relationship between manual wheelchair skill performance and participation of persons with spinal cord injuries 1 year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Claude Vincent,et al.  Development of an obstacle course assessment of wheelchair user performance (OCAWUP): A content validity study , 2004 .

[23]  Claude Vincent,et al.  Mobility of wheelchair users: a proposed performance assessment framework. , 2003 .

[24]  J. Ditunno,et al.  Chronic spinal cord injury. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  L. M. Anderson Statistics with Confidence. Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines , 1989 .

[26]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Wheelchair skills tests: a systematic review , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[27]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  Measurement of time in a standardized test of patient mobility. , 1970, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  J. Middleton,et al.  Five additional mobility and locomotor items to improve responsiveness of the FIM in wheelchair-dependent individuals with spinal cord injury , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[29]  Jeffrey S. Webster,et al.  Behavioral interventions with stroke patients for improving wheelchair navigation , 1984 .