On the Choice of Obtaining and Disclosing the Commonvalue in Auctions

This paper introduces a game-theoretic analysis of auction settings where bidders' private values depend on an uncertain common value, and only the auctioneer has the option to purchase information to eliminate that uncertainty. Here, the auctioneer's mission is to reason about whether to purchase the information and, after purchasing it, whether to disclose it to the bidders. Unlike prior work, the model assumes that bidders are aware of the auctioneer's option to purchase the external information but not necessarily aware of her decision. Our analysis of the individual revenue-maximizing strategies results in the characterization of a Bayesian Nash equilibrium profile. Based on the analysis, several somehow non-intuitive equilibrium characteristics are demonstrated, among which: (i) the availability of external information may reduce the auctioneer's expected revenue, (ii) an expensive pricing of the information may actually be benefit for the auctioneer, (iii) in contrast to traditional results, an increase in the number of bidders does not necessarily results in an increase in the auctioneer's expected revenue.

[1]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Market-Skilled Agents for Automating the Bandwidth Commerce , 2000, USM.

[2]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Efficiently determining the appropriate mix of personal interaction and reputation information in partner choice , 2008, AAMAS.

[3]  P. Cramton The FCC Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment , 1997 .

[4]  M. Dufwenberg Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[5]  H. Hosam,et al.  Planning Coalition Formation under Uncertainty: Auction Approach , 2006, 2006 2nd International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies.

[6]  Theo Offerman,et al.  Competitive Bidding in Auctions with Private and Common Values , 2000 .

[7]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Signaling schemes for revenue maximization , 2012, EC '12.

[8]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[9]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[10]  Claudia Linnhoff-Popien,et al.  Trends in Distributed Systems: Towards a Universal Service Market , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[11]  J. Laffont Game Theory and Empirical Economics: The Case of Auction Data , 1997 .

[12]  J. Goeree,et al.  Efficiency in auctions with Private and Common Values , 2002 .

[13]  E. Maasland,et al.  Auction Theory , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[14]  P. Reny,et al.  On the failure of the linkage principle in multi-unit auctions , 1999 .

[15]  Péter Eso An optimal auction with correlated values and risk aversion , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[16]  Amos Azaria,et al.  Strategic Information Disclosure to People with Multiple Alternatives , 2011, AAAI.

[17]  T. Sandholm,et al.  Costly valuation computation in auctions , 2001 .

[18]  Ruqu Wang Auctions versus Posted-Price Selling: The Case of Correlated Private Valuations , 1998 .

[19]  David Sarne,et al.  The Choice of Eliminating the Uncertainty Cloud in Auctions , 2009, AMEC/TADA.

[20]  Nir Vulkan,et al.  Introduction to The Economics of E-Commerce: A Strategic Guide to Understanding and Designing the Online Marketplace , 2003 .

[21]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Optimal Auction Design for Agents with Hard Valuation Problems , 1999, Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce.