Intimate Partner Violence Control Scale: Development and Initial Testing

Although control has long been considered central to understanding intimate partner violence (IPV), there continues to be a notable lack of validated scales measuring control (e.g., Strauchler et al. Journal of Family Violence, 19(6), 339–354, 2004). The purpose of this study was to develop and empirically validate a brief assessment tool, the Intimate Partner Violence Control Scale (IPVCS), designed to measure control in the context of IPV. Data from a sample of male undergraduate and graduate students (n = 436) were used to examine the scale’s properties. After reviewing theoretical conceptualizations and measurement issues of control, psychometric properties of the IPVCS and results of exploratory hypotheses tests are presented. The availability of a brief and reliable measure of control offers a tool for professionals in the judicial system, for IPV victims’ advocates, and for human services workers in practice settings to adequately assess for control and fills a gap in this area of research and practice.

[1]  R. Felson,et al.  The Control Motive and Marital Violence , 2007, Violence and Victims.

[2]  E. Schubert,et al.  Levels of Differentiation and Marital Egalitarianism in Men who Batter , 2002 .

[3]  M. Bartlett,et al.  A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations , 1954 .

[4]  M. Straus.  The Conflict Tactics Scales and Its Critics: An Evaluation and New Data on Validity and Reliability. , 1987 .

[5]  H. Lips,et al.  Sexually violent pornography, anti-women attitudes, and sexual aggression: A structural equation model. , 1993 .

[6]  D. Sugarman,et al.  The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) , 1996 .

[7]  J. Gerberding,et al.  Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence--United States, 2005. , 2008, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[8]  M. Straus,et al.  Marital Power, Conflict, and Violence In a Nationally Representative Sample of American Couples , 1986, Violence and Victims.

[9]  Richard B. Felson,et al.  Violence, aggression & coercive actions , 1994 .

[10]  J. S. Tanaka,et al.  Characteristics of aggressors against women: testing a model using a national sample of college students. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  C. Murray.  Controversy, Constraints, and Context: Understanding Family Violence Through Family Systems Theory , 2006 .

[12]  M. Koss,et al.  Sexual Experiences Survey: a research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. , 1982, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[13]  R. Gelles,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF VIOLENCE IN THE FAMILY : TOWARD A THEORETICAL INTEGRATION , 2002 .

[14]  R. Mckeown,et al.  Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. , 2000, Archives of family medicine.

[15]  M. Straus,et al.  Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families , 1990, Violence and Victims.

[16]  D. Dutton,et al.  Assessment of Wife Assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using Couple Data to Quantify the Differential Reporting Effect. , 1986 .

[17]  K J Hemphill,et al.  Patterns of Socially Desirable Responding Among Perpetrators and Victims of Wife Assault , 1992, Violence and Victims.

[18]  S. Beach,et al.  Validity of self-reports of marital violence , 1987, Journal of Family Violence.

[19]  R. Felson.  Violence and gender reexamined. , 2002 .

[20]  J. Golding.  Intimate Partner Violence as a Risk Factor for Mental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis , 1999, Journal of Family Violence.

[21]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives , 1996 .

[22]  Wesley R. Burr,et al.  Contemporary theories about the family , 1979 .

[23]  L. Goodman,et al.  Beyond Frequency and Severity , 2006, Violence against women.

[24]  M. Burt.  Cultural myths and supports for rape. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  S. Bartle,et al.  Individuation and relationship violence , 1994 .

[26]  R. Felson,et al.  The control motive in intimate partner violence , 2000 .

[27]  D. Dutton,et al.  Motivational Needs for Power and Spouse-Specific Assertiveness in Assaultive and Nonassaultive Men , 1987, Violence and Victims.

[28]  B. Burkhart,et al.  Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. , 1984, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[29]  Diane L. Zosky.  The Application of Object Relations Theory to Domestic Violence , 1999 .

[30]  M. Straus,et al.  Physical Violence in 8145 Families in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence , 1990 .

[31]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[32]  R. Dobash,et al.  Violence against wives , 1979 .

[33]  E. Gondolf,et al.  The case against anger control treatment for batterers , 1986 .

[34]  Kathy A. McCloskey,et al.  Humiliation, Manipulation, and Control: Evidence of Centrality in Domestic Violence Against an Adult Partner , 2004, Journal of Family Violence.

[35]  M. P. Johnson,et al.  Research on Domestic Violence in the 1990s: Making Distinctions , 2000 .

[36]  S. Minuchin,et al.  Family Healing: Tales of Hope and Renewal from Family Therapy , 1992 .

[37]  G. Barnes,et al.  Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women: a 10-year follow-up study. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  E. Pence,et al.  Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model , 1993 .

[39]  D. Cook,et al.  A SYSTEMIC TREATMENT APPROACH TO WIFE BATTERING , 1984 .

[40]  N. Malamuth,et al.  Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  K. Yllo,et al.  Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse , 1989, Violence and Victims.

[42]  P. Caesar.  Treating Men Who Batter: Theory, Practice and Programs , 1989 .

[43]  Jeffrey A. Roth,et al.  Understanding and Preventing Violence , 1992 .

[44]  M. Koss,et al.  Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders , 1985 .

[45]  R. Dobash,et al.  Women, violence, and social change , 1992 .

[46]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Medical costs and productivity losses due to interpersonal and self-directed violence in the United States. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[47]  Murray A. Straus,et al.  Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. , 1979 .

[48]  C. Muehlenhard,et al.  Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. , 1987 .

[49]  J. B. Kelly,et al.  DIFFERENTIATION AMONG TYPES OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE: RESEARCH UPDATE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS , 2008 .

[50]  M. P. Johnson,et al.  Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women , 1995 .

[51]  M. Dutton,et al.  Coercion in Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a New Conceptualization , 2005 .

[52]  M. Daly,et al.  An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective on Male Sexual Proprietariness and Violence Against Wives , 1993, Violence and Victims.

[53]  D. Dutton.  The Domestic Assault of Women: Psychological and Criminal Justice Perspectives , 1988 .

[54]  D. Adams.  Treatment models of men who batter: A profeminist analysis. , 1988 .

[55]  J. E. Stets,et al.  Interactive Processes in Dating Aggression: A National Study. , 1992 .

[56]  H. Kaiser.  An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[57]  A. Browne,et al.  Violence between spouses and intimates: Physical aggression between women and men in intimate relationships. , 1994 .

[58]  M. Koss,et al.  Sexual experiences survey: reliability and validity. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[59]  D. Tilley,et al.  MEN WHO BATTER INTIMATE PARTNERS: A GROUNDED THEORY STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MALE VIOLENCE IN INTIMATE PARTNER RELATIONSHIPS , 2005, Issues in mental health nursing.