High field BOLD response to forepaw stimulation in the mouse

We have established a robust protocol for longitudinal fMRI in mice at high field MRI using a medetomidine anesthesia. Electrical forepaw stimulation in anesthetized animals is widely used to produce BOLD contrast in the primary somatosensory cortex. To preserve neuronal activity, most fMRI experiments used alpha-chloralose to produce sedation, but severe side effects make this procedure unsuitable for survival experiments. As advantageous alternative, the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist medetomidine has been applied successfully to permit longitudinal fMRI studies in rats. With the advent of transgenic technology, mouse models have become increasingly attractive raising the demand for implementation of a suitable fMRI protocol for mice. Therefore, we investigated the use of medetomidine for repetitive fMRI experiments in C57BL/6 mice. We evaluated the optimal medetomidine dose for subcutaneous application. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in the contralateral somatosensory cortex were recorded to assess brain activity under medetominidine following forepaw stimulation. Repetitive administration of medetomidine, the requirement for longitudinal brain activation studies, was well tolerated. Using the forepaw stimulation paradigm, we observed BOLD contrast in the contralateral somatosensory cortex in approximately 50% of the performed scans using gradient echo-echo planar imaging (GE-EPI). However, imaging the small mouse brain at high field strength is challenging and we observed strong susceptibility artifacts in GE-EPI images in the cortex. We have developed an agar gel cap for successful compensation of these artifacts as prerequisite for successful mouse fMRI at 11.7T. The established protocol will be suitable for brain activation studies in transgenic animals and for studies of functional deficit and recovery after brain injury in mice.

[1]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Effect of Basal Conditions on the Magnitude and Dynamics of the Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent fMRI Response , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  Christopher P. Pawela,et al.  Modeling of region-specific fMRI BOLD neurovascular response functions in rat brain reveals residual differences that correlate with the differences in regional evoked potentials , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Rausch,et al.  Bicuculline‐induced brain activation in mice detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  David A. Boas,et al.  Coupling between somatosensory evoked potentials and hemodynamic response in the rat , 2008, NeuroImage.

[5]  M. Hoehn,et al.  Gradient echo time dependence and quantitative parameter maps for somatosensory activation in rats at 7 T , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  T. Duong,et al.  Imaging oxygen consumption in forepaw somatosensory stimulation in rats under isoflurane anesthesia , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R W Briggs,et al.  Microimaging at 14 tesla using GESEPI for removal of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in T(2)(*)-weighted image contrast. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[9]  A. Hudetz,et al.  In Vivo Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Laser‐Doppler Flow and Pial Arteriolar Diameter , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[10]  Mathias Hoehn,et al.  Differential Effects of NMDA and AMPA Glutamate Receptors on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signals and Evoked Neuronal Activity during Forepaw Stimulation of the Rat , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  D. Dubowitz,et al.  Peripheral somatosensory fMRI in mouse at 11.7 T , 2001, NMR in biomedicine.

[12]  J. Strupp Stimulate: A GUI based fMRI analysis software package , 1996, NeuroImage.

[13]  A Kriss,et al.  Comparison of the effects of four anaesthetic agents on somatosensory evoked potentials in the rat , 1999, Laboratory animals.

[14]  M Hoehn-Berlage,et al.  Variation of functional MRI signal in response to frequency of somatosensory stimulation in α‐chloralose anesthetized rats , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  M Hoehn-Berlage,et al.  Brainmapping of α‐chloralose anesthetized rats with T2*‐weighted imaging: distinction between the representation of the forepaw and hindpaw in the somatosensory cortex , 1998, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  S. Czellár,et al.  Epicranial sensory evoked potential recordings for repeated assessment of cortical functions in mice , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  M. Sinclair A review of the physiological effects of alpha2-agonists related to the clinical use of medetomidine in small animal practice. , 2003, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[18]  J. Silverman,et al.  A review of laboratory animal anesthesia with chloral hydrate and chloralose. , 1993, Laboratory animal science.

[19]  Lei Zhou,et al.  BOLD study of stimulation-induced neural activity and resting-state connectivity in medetomidine-sedated rat , 2008, NeuroImage.

[20]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Simultaneous Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent and Cerebral Blood Flow Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging during Forepaw Stimulation in the Rat , 1999, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  A Villringer,et al.  Characterization of CBF response to somatosensory stimulation: model and influence of anesthetics. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  M. Ueki,et al.  Effect of alpha‐chloralose, halothane, pentobarbital and nitrous oxide anesthesia on metabolic coupling in somatosensory cortex of rat , 1992, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[23]  Ws. Rasband ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA , 2011 .

[24]  T. Duong,et al.  Echo‐planar BOLD fMRI of mice on a narrow‐bore 9.4 T magnet , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  L. Sokoloff,et al.  Effects of anesthesia on functional activation of cerebral blood flow and metabolism , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Relationship between neural, vascular, and BOLD signals in isoflurane-anesthetized rat somatosensory cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Mathias Hoehn,et al.  Early Prediction of Functional Recovery after Experimental Stroke: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Electrophysiology, and Behavioral Testing in Rats , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  A protocol for use of medetomidine anesthesia in rats for extended studies using task-induced BOLD contrast and resting-state functional connectivity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[29]  H. Merkle,et al.  Functional MRI of the rodent somatosensory pathway using multislice echo planar imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  K. Hossmann,et al.  Simultaneous recording of evoked potentials and T  *2 ‐weighted MR images during somatosensory stimulation of rat , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Dirk Wiedermann,et al.  A fully noninvasive and robust experimental protocol for longitudinal fMRI studies in the rat , 2006, NeuroImage.