Counting at low concentrations: the statistical challenges of verifying ballast water discharge standards.

Discharge from the ballast tanks of ships is one of the primary vectors of nonindigenous species in marine environments. To mitigate this environmental and economic threat, international, national, and state entities are establishing regulations to limit the concentration of living organisms that may be discharged from the ballast tanks of ships. The proposed discharge standards have ranged from zero detectable organisms to < 10 organisms/ m3. If standard sampling methods are used, verifying whether ballast discharge complies with these stringent standards will be challenging due to the inherent stochasticity of sampling. Furthermore, at low concentrations, very large volumes of water must be sampled to find enough organisms to accurately estimate concentration. Despite these challenges, adequate sampling protocols comprise a critical aspect of establishing standards because they help define the actual risk level associated with a standard. A standard that appears very stringent may be effectively lax if it is paired with an inadequate sampling protocol. We describe some of the statistical issues associated with sampling at low concentrations to help regulators understand the uncertainties of sampling as well as to inform the development of sampling protocols that ensure discharge standards are adequately implemented.

[1]  S. Evans,et al.  The International Journal of Biostatistics Confidence Intervals for Negative Binomial Random Variables of High Dispersion , 2011 .

[2]  Mitchell H. Gail,et al.  Encyclopedia of Epidemiologic Methods , 2002 .

[3]  Chad L. Hewitt,et al.  Heterogeneous zooplankton distribution in a ship's ballast tanks , 2002 .

[4]  P. Reilly,et al.  Quantification of analytical recovery in particle and microorganism enumeration methods. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  E. Lemieux,et al.  Evaluation of Representative Sampling for Rare Populations Using Microbeads , 2008 .

[6]  L. R. Taylor,et al.  Aggregation, Variance and the Mean , 1961, Nature.

[7]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  Rapid on-chip genetic detection microfluidic platform for real world applications. , 2009, Biomicrofluidics.

[8]  L Joe Moffitt,et al.  Robust detection protocols for uncertain introductions of invasive species. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  M. Tamburri,et al.  Enumerating Sparse Organisms in Ships’ Ballast Water: Why Counting to 10 Is Not So Easy , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Benjamin M. Bolker,et al.  Ecological Models and Data in R , 2008 .

[11]  E. Evers,et al.  A statistical method to determine whether micro-organisms are randomly distributed in a food matrix, applied to coliforms and Escherichia coli O157 in minced beef , 2003 .

[12]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  “Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA , 2011 .

[13]  Dimitris Karlis,et al.  A Simulation Comparison of Several Procedures for Testing the Poisson Assumption , 2000 .

[14]  P. Pheloung,et al.  A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions , 1999 .

[15]  Monica B. Emelko,et al.  Particle and microorganism enumeration data: enabling quantitative rigor and judicious interpretation. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  J. Harte,et al.  The Impossibility of Estimating a Negative Binomial Clustering Parameter from Presence‐Absence Data: A Comment on He and Gaston , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[17]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  ASSESSING RARITY OF SPECIES WITH LOW DETECTABILITY: LICHENS IN PACIFIC NORTHWEST FORESTS , 2004 .

[18]  J. M. Elliott,et al.  Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates , 1971 .

[19]  A. Hocking,et al.  Sampling for microbiological analysis. , 2003 .

[20]  R. V. Richard,et al.  Analysis of Ballast Water Sampling Port Designs Using Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2008 .

[21]  Melanie Frazier,et al.  Density matters: Review of approaches to setting organism-based ballast water discharge standards , 2010 .

[22]  C. Scianni,et al.  2009 ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICACY, AVAILABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF BALLAST WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS FOR USE IN CALIFORNIA WATERS , 2009 .

[23]  John M. Lishman,et al.  Ballast water regulations and the move toward concentration-based numeric discharge limits. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  S. Gollasch A new ballast water sampling device for sampling organisms above 50 micron , 2006 .

[25]  A. Solow,et al.  ESTIMATING THE RATE OF SPECIES INTRODUCTIONS FROM THE DISCOVERY RECORD , 2004 .

[26]  David A. Wright Logistics of shipboard and dockside testing of ballast water treatment systems in the United States , 2007 .