Spatial heterogeneity for environmental performance and resilient behavior in energy and transportation systems

This paper describes an assessment of the effects of spatial heterogeneity on the future performance and resilience of an urban area. For this, indicators of environmental performance and resilience of critical infrastructures (energy and transportation systems) are explored. The approach combines established methododologies of building performance simulation, energy systems analysis, and environmental impact assessment of buildings and transportation systems. The study is centered on future urban design scenarios for an industrial neighborhood in Switzerland. For this case study, multi-functionality is proportional to the performance and resilience of critical infrastructures. Mono-functionality improves the resilience and performance of energy systems with a negative effect on that of transportation systems. Building intensity, and resource intensive users were found to play a higher role into the future performance and resilience of the area. The findings of this research could complement planning approaches of sustainable and resilient urban areas.

[1]  Evy Öhrström,et al.  The effect of creating a quiet side on annoyance and sleep disturbances due to road traffic noise , 2012 .

[2]  Sameer Deshkar,et al.  Community Resilience Approach for Prioritizing Infrastructure Development in Urban Areas , 2016 .

[3]  Susan S. Fainstein,et al.  Cities and Diversity , 2005 .

[4]  Lars Marcus,et al.  Toward an integrated theory of spatial morphology and resilient urban systems , 2014 .

[5]  K. Lynch.  Good city form , 1984 .

[6]  U. W. Tang,et al.  Influences of urban forms on traffic-induced noise and air pollution: Results from a modelling system , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Lizhi Wang,et al.  Interdependencies between Energy and Transportation Systems for National Long Term Planning , 2010 .

[8]  R. Smokers,et al.  Handbook on estimation of external cost in the transport sector: produced within the study Internalisation Measures and Policies for All external Cost of Transport (IMPACT) , 2007 .

[9]  Satoshi Ishii,et al.  Impact of future urban form on the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from residential, commercial and public buildings in Utsunomiya, Japan , 2010 .

[10]  Jimeno A. Fonseca,et al.  Assessing the environmental impact of future urban developments at neighborhood scale , 2015 .

[11]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems , 2004 .

[12]  Lígia Torres Silva,et al.  Urban form indicators as proxy on the noise exposure of buildings , 2014 .

[13]  Tristan Kershaw,et al.  Urban form and function as building performance parameters , 2013 .

[14]  Arno Schlueter,et al.  Integrated model for characterization of spatiotemporal building energy consumption patterns in neighborhoods and city districts , 2015 .

[15]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2013 .

[16]  E. Salomons,et al.  Urban traffic noise and the relation to urban density, form, and traffic elasticity , 2012 .

[17]  François Maréchal,et al.  City Energy Analyst (CEA): Integrated framework for analysis and optimization of building energy systems in neighborhoods and city districts , 2016 .

[18]  Drake E. Warren,et al.  A Framework for Assessing the Resilience of Infrastructure and Economic Systems , 2010 .

[19]  M. Duncan,et al.  Relationships of Land Use Mix with Walking for Transport: Do Land Uses and Geographical Scale Matter? , 2010, Journal of Urban Health.

[20]  Atta-ur-Rahman,et al.  Cities, Vulnerability, and Climate Change , 2016 .