Postseismic uplift of the Andes following the 2010 Maule earthquake: Implications for mantle rheology

Postseismic surface deformation associated with great subduction earthquakes is controlled by asthenosphere rheology, frictional properties of the fault, and structural complexity. Here by modeling GPS displacements in the 6 years following the 2010Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake in Chile, we investigate the impact of heterogeneous viscosity distribution in the South American subcontinental asthenosphere on the 3-D postseismic deformation pattern. The observed postseismic deformation is characterized by flexure of the South America plate with peak uplift in the Andean mountain range and subsidence in the hinterland. We find that, at the time scale of observation, over 2 orders of magnitude gradual increase in asthenosphere viscosity from the arc area toward the cratonic hinterland is needed to jointly explain horizontal and vertical displacements. Our findings present an efficient method to estimate spatial variations of viscosity, which clearly improves the fitting to the vertical signal of deformation. Lateral changes in asthenosphere viscosity can be correlated with the thermomechanical transition from weak subvolcanic arc mantle to strong subcratonic mantle, thus suggesting a stationary heterogeneous viscosity structure. However, we cannot rule out a transient viscosity structure (e.g., power law rheology) with the short time span of observation.

[1]  David J. Wald,et al.  Slab1.0: A three‐dimensional model of global subduction zone geometries , 2012 .

[2]  Michael Bevis,et al.  Separating rapid relocking, afterslip, and viscoelastic relaxation: An application of the postseismic straightening method to the Maule 2010 cGPS , 2016 .

[3]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Deformation cycles of subduction earthquakes in a viscoelastic Earth , 2012, Nature.

[4]  V. Hamza,et al.  Heat flow map of South America , 1996 .

[5]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Joint estimation of afterslip rate and postseismic relaxation following the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake , 1998 .

[6]  Michael Bevis,et al.  Separating simultaneous postseismic processes: An application of the postseismic straightening method to the Maule 2010 cGPSv , 2016 .

[7]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  Stress‐driven relaxation of heterogeneous upper mantle and time‐dependent afterslip following the 2011 Tohoku earthquake , 2016 .

[8]  Paul Rosen,et al.  Postseismic Rebound in Fault Step-Overs Caused by Pore Fluid Flow , 1996, Science.

[9]  M. Springer Interpretation of heat-flow density in the Central Andes , 1999 .

[10]  Roland Bürgmann,et al.  Evidence of power-law flow in the Mojave desert mantle , 2004, Nature.

[11]  Michael Bevis,et al.  Toward understanding tectonic control on the Mw 8.8 2010 Maule Chile earthquake , 2012 .

[12]  Yan Hu,et al.  Contributions of poroelastic rebound and a weak volcanic arc to the postseismic deformation of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake , 2014, Earth, Planets and Space.

[13]  Michael Bevis,et al.  A high-resolution, time-variable afterslip model for the 2010 Maule Mw = 8.8, Chile megathrust earthquake , 2013 .

[14]  Shanan E. Peters,et al.  From Geodetic Imaging of Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip to Dynamic Modeling of the Seismic Cycle , 2015 .

[15]  Y. Ito,et al.  Heterogeneous rheology controlled postseismic deformation of the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake , 2016 .

[16]  Greg Hirth,et al.  Using short-term postseismic displacements to infer the ambient deformation conditions of the upper mantle , 2011 .

[17]  Paul Segall,et al.  Post-earthquake ground movements correlated to pore-pressure transients , 2003, Nature.

[18]  J. Avouac,et al.  From Geodetic Imaging of Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip to Dynamic Modeling of the Seismic Cycle , 2015 .

[19]  Michael Bevis,et al.  Coseismic and postseismic slip associated with the 2010 Maule Earthquake, Chile: Characterizing the Arauco Peninsula barrier effect , 2013 .

[20]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Viscoelastic relaxation following subduction earthquakes and its effects on afterslip determination , 2015 .

[21]  M. Pérez‐Gussinyé,et al.  Effective elastic thickness variations along the Andean margin and their relationship to subduction geometry , 2008 .

[22]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Effect of 3-D viscoelastic structure on post-seismic relaxation from the 2004 M= 9.2 Sumatra earthquake , 2008 .

[23]  Motoyuki Kido,et al.  Prevalence of viscoelastic relaxation after the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake , 2014, Nature.

[24]  Matthew G. Knepley,et al.  A domain decomposition approach to implementing fault slip in finite‐element models of quasi‐static and dynamic crustal deformation , 2013, ArXiv.

[25]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[26]  W. Peltier,et al.  The Viscosities of the Earth's Mantle , 2013 .

[27]  A. Osses,et al.  Lithospheric flexure modelling seaward of the Chile trench: implications for oceanic plate weakening in the Trench Outer Rise region , 2010 .

[28]  J. Avouac,et al.  Postseismic relocking of the subduction megathrust following the 2007 Pisco, Peru, earthquake , 2016 .

[29]  S. Kirby,et al.  Rheology of the lithosphere: Selected topics , 1987 .

[30]  Chris Marone,et al.  On the mechanics of earthquake afterslip , 1991 .

[31]  Yasuo Ogawa,et al.  New volume of Earth, Planets and Space with an open access-style publishing model under SpringerOpen , 2014, Earth, Planets and Space.

[32]  Roland Bürgmann,et al.  Viscoelastic relaxation in a heterogeneous Earth following the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake , 2015 .

[33]  A. Echaurren,et al.  Anatomy of the Andean subduction zone: three-dimensional density model upgraded and compared against global-scale models , 2012 .

[34]  E. Klein,et al.  Afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation model inferred from the large-scale post-seismic deformation following the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake (Chile) , 2015 .

[35]  T. Herring,et al.  Far‐reaching transient motions after Mojave earthquakes require broad mantle flow beneath a strong crust , 2007 .