Deriving Optimal Daily Reservoir Operation Scheme with Consideration of Downstream Ecological Hydrograph Through A Time-Nested Approach

The ecological flow requirement (EFR) during special life stages of species, for instance the fish spawning period, concerns not only the flow rate, but also daily changes in the flow rate. Therefore, it is more appropriate to optimize ecologically-friendly reservoir operation on a daily base. Directly formulating and solving a daily-based optimization model would involve a large number of decision variables as well as constraints, which may lead to unfavourable time consumption and unreliable solutions. This study proposes a time-nested approach to derive an optimal daily reservoir operation scheme with consideration of the downstream ecological hydrograph. It scales down the decision variables from monthly-base to 10-day base and finally to daily-base. The proposed method was applied to two cascaded reservoirs in the Yalong River in southwest China, where a daily ecological flow is required to conserve the habitats of an indigenous fish Schizothorax chongi (S. chongi). The results showed that the developed method could efficiently derive a daily optimal operational scheme with the consideration of downstream EFR for fish habitat conservation. In addition, the method greatly improves global searching ability in dealing with complex optimization problems.

[1]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[2]  Duan Chen,et al.  Adapting the operation of two cascaded reservoirs for ecological flow requirement of a de-watered river channel due to diversion-type hydropower stations , 2013 .

[3]  G. Guariso,et al.  Optimal Flow Allocation in the Zambezi River System , 1997 .

[4]  Ralph A. Wurbs.  Reservoir‐System Simulation and Optimization Models , 1993 .

[5]  Li Chen,et al.  Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm for Rule-Based Flood Control Reservoir Management , 1998 .

[6]  Henriette I. Jager,et al.  Designing Optimal Flow Patterns for Fall Chinook Salmon in a Central Valley, California, River , 2003 .

[7]  A. Bednarek,et al.  MODIFYING DAM OPERATIONS TO RESTORE RIVERS: ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO TENNESSEE RIVER DAM MITIGATION , 2005 .

[8]  Dong Shikui,et al.  Ecological Water Requirement (EWR) Analysis of High Mountain and Steep Gorge (HMSG) River—Application to Upper Lancang–Mekong River , 2008 .

[9]  Xinghui Xia,et al.  Incorporating Eco-environmental Water Requirements in Integrated Evaluation of Water Quality and Quantity—A Study for the Yellow River , 2009 .

[10]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  Operating rules for multi-reservoir systems , 1994 .

[11]  R. P. Oliveira,et al.  Operating rules for multireservoir systems , 1997 .

[12]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[13]  C. Harman,et al.  Optimizing dam release rules to meet environmental flow targets , 2005 .

[14]  J. Wayland Eheart,et al.  Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime , 2006 .

[15]  Reza Kerachian,et al.  Deriving operating policies for multi-objective reservoir systems: Application of Self-Learning Genetic Algorithm , 2010, Appl. Soft Comput..

[16]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Reservoir Management and Operations Models: A State‐of‐the‐Art Review , 1985 .

[17]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Managed flood releases from reservoirs: issues and guidance , 2000 .

[18]  Jenq-Tzong Shiau,et al.  COMPROMISE PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING INSTREAM FLOW UNDER MULTIOBJECTIVE WATER ALLOCATION CRITERIA 1 , 2006 .

[19]  Robert M. Hughes,et al.  Effects of flow fluctuations on the daily and seasonal drift of invertebrates in a tropical river , 2013 .

[20]  Hal E. Cardwell,et al.  Designing Instream Flows to Satisfy Fish and Human Water Needs , 1996 .

[21]  Edwin E. Herricks,et al.  Evaluating the Potential Impact of Reservoir Operation on Fish Communities , 2009 .

[22]  Michael J. Sale,et al.  An approach to optimizing reservoir operation for downstream aquatic resources , 1982 .

[23]  I. C. Goulter,et al.  Screening model for assessing ‘cost’ of minimum flow requirements in the Svartå River, Sweden , 1988 .

[24]  John W. Labadie,et al.  Optimal Operation of Multireservoir Systems: State-of-the-Art Review , 2004 .

[25]  G. Q. Chen,et al.  Environmental flow requirements for integrated water resources allocation in the Yellow River Basin, China , 2009 .

[26]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[27]  Qiuwen Chen,et al.  Ecological hydrograph based on Schizothorax chongi habitat conservation in the dewatered river channel between Jinping cascaded dams , 2011 .

[28]  Ban Xuan,et al.  Ecological flow requirement for Chinese sturgeon spawning habitat , 2011 .

[29]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  An Optimization Approach for Balancing Human and Ecological Flow Needs , 2005 .

[30]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Integrated assessment of water resources: Australian experiences , 2006 .

[31]  Nicholas E. Jones,et al.  THE DUAL NATURE OF HYDROPEAKING RIVERS: IS ECOPEAKING POSSIBLE? , 2014 .

[32]  Theodore A. Endreny,et al.  Analysis of Daily Peaking and Run‐of‐River Operations with Flow Variability Metrics, Considering Subdaily to Seasonal Time Scales , 2014 .

[33]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .