Networking or going solo? Understanding the Learner's Perspective in the Flexible Learning Environment

The question we set out to answer is: How do students in the LUMA-GIS programme go about their learning of GIS? The research question was approached from a phenomenographic perspective with the intention of generating descriptions and analyses of ways of experiencing the flexibility and the learning that is afforded in the programme. Data sources in this study included in-depth interviews and questionnaires (second-order data) as well as naturalistic data from submitted course work (first-order data). The entire population consisted of one hundred and ten students, who had finished the first course in the programme. Data is analysed and interpreted both from a quantitative and a qualitative perspective. Preliminary analysis of the data shows some interesting differences between students tendency to communicate with others in the course.

[1]  Louise Archer,et al.  Challenging Cultures? Student Conceptions of 'Belonging' and 'Isolation' at a Post-1992 University , 2003 .

[2]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Colleges as Communities: Taking Research on Student Persistence Seriously , 1997, The Review of Higher Education.

[3]  Olga Dysthe The Learning Potential of a Web-mediated Discussion in a University Course , 2002 .

[4]  W. G. Perry Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[5]  J. Doyon Skill learning. , 1997, International review of neurobiology.

[6]  Betty Collis,et al.  Flexible learning and design of instruction , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  K. Trigwell,et al.  RELATING APPROACHES TO STUDY AND QUALITY OF LEARNING OUTCOMES AT THE COURSE LEVEL , 1991 .

[8]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[9]  F. Marton Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[10]  Scott W. Brown,et al.  Student Traits and Attributes Contributing to Success in Online Courses: Evaluation of University Online Courses , 2004 .

[11]  Paul C. Burnett Assessing the structure of learning outcomes from counselling using the SOLO taxonomy: an exploratory study , 1999 .

[12]  P. Ramsden A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire , 1991 .

[13]  William W. Gaver,et al.  AFFORDANCES FOR INTERACTION: THE SOCIAL IS MATERIAL FOR DESIGN , 1996 .

[14]  Jianxia Du,et al.  Dynamic online discussion: task‐oriented interaction for deep learning , 2005 .

[15]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[16]  V. Lally,et al.  Building a Learning Community On-Line: Towards Socio-Academic Interaction. , 1999 .

[17]  F. Marton,et al.  The Experience of Learning , 1984 .

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .