Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results

BACKGROUND Several randomized controlled trials have not shown a benefit from preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) biopsy of cleavage-stage embryos and assessment of up to 10 chromosomes for aneuploidy. Therefore, a proof-of-principle study was planned to determine the reliability of alternative form of PGS, i.e. PGS by polar body (PB) biopsy, with whole genome amplification and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) analysis. METHODS In two centres, all mature metaphase II oocytes from patients who consented to the study were fertilized by ICSI. The first and second PBs (PB1and PB2) were biopsied and analysed separately for chromosome copy number by array CGH. If either or both of the PBs were found to be aneuploid, the corresponding zygote was then also processed by array CGH for concordance analysis. RESULTS Both PBs were biopsied from a total of 226 zygotes from 42 cycles (average 5.5 per cycle; range 1–15) in 41 couples with an average maternal age of 40.0 years. Of these, the ploidy status of the zygote could be predicted in 195 (86%): 55 were euploid (28%) and 140 were aneuploid (72%). With only one exception, there was at least one predicted aneuploid zygote in each cycle and in 19 out of 42 cycles (45%), all zygotes were predicted to be aneuploid. Fresh embryos were transferred in the remaining 23 cycles (55%), and one frozen transfer was done. Eight patients had a clinical pregnancy of which seven were evolutive (ongoing pregnancy rates: 17% per cycle and 30% per transfer). The ploidy status of 156 zygotes was successfully analysed by array CGH: 38 (24%) were euploid and 118 (76%) were aneuploid. In 138 cases complete information was available on both PBs and the corresponding zygotes. In 130 (94%), the ploidy status of the zygote was concordant with the ploidy status of the PBs and in 8 (6%), the results were discordant. CONCLUSIONS This proof-of-principle study indicates that the ploidy of the zygote can be predicted with acceptable accuracy by array CGH analysis of both PBs.

[1]  B. Plunkett,et al.  Preimplantation genetic screening in older women: a cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  Michel Camus,et al.  Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[3]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[4]  D. Pinkel,et al.  Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid Tumors , 2022 .

[5]  K. Hirschhorn,et al.  First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  S. Munné,et al.  Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  Luca Gianaroli,et al.  Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  M. Keskintepe,et al.  Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genomic hybridization [correction of hybrydization] provides a highly reliable method for selecting "competent" embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  R. Williamson,et al.  Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization , 2000, Human Genetics.

[10]  Jacques Cohen,et al.  Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage-stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect. , 2002, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[11]  S. Pickering,et al.  The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British Fertility Society Policy and Practice Guidelines , 2008, Human fertility.

[12]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  Impact of oocyte cryopreservation on embryo development. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  First meiosis errors in immature oocytes generated by stimulated cycles. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. , 1993, Human reproduction.

[15]  J. Garcia-Bernardo,et al.  Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF? , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  D. Wells,et al.  Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. , 2000, Molecular human reproduction.

[17]  B. Fauser,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[18]  P. Haentjens,et al.  Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[19]  M. Montag,et al.  Rapid comparative genomic hybridization protocol for prenatal diagnosis and its application to aneuploidy screening of human polar bodies. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. , 1999, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  M. Montag,et al.  Polar body biopsy. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[22]  M. Montag,et al.  Polar body biopsy: a viable alternative to preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. , 2009, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[23]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  H. Danzer,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[25]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  The combination of polar body and embryo biopsy does not affect embryo viability. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[26]  J. Vermeesch,et al.  Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy in embryos after in vitro fertilization (IVF) does not improve reproductive outcome in women over 35: a prospective controlled randomized study , 2007 .

[27]  Jacques Cohen,et al.  Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. , 2003, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[28]  R. Jansen,et al.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[29]  Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[30]  D. Gardner,et al.  IS ANEUPLOIDY SCREENING FOR PATIENTS AGED 35 OR OVER BENEFICIAL? A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL , 2004 .

[31]  R. Williamson,et al.  Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  Aneuploidies of chromosomes 1, 4, and 6 are not compatible with human embryos' implantation. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[33]  Jacques Cohen,et al.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 years and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[34]  K. Vesela,et al.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[35]  S. Klipstein,et al.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the "good prognosis" patient. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[36]  Jacques Cohen,et al.  Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility using "no result rescue". , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[37]  Jacques Cohen,et al.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: a multicenter study. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[38]  Santiago Munné,et al.  Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[39]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: technical aspects , 2011, Human reproduction.

[40]  K. Sermon,et al.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis , 2003, The Lancet.

[41]  M. Keskintepe,et al.  Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genomic hybrydization provides a highly reliable method for selecting “competent” embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study , 2007 .