Good guys and bad guys
暂无分享,去创建一个
ECTJ, VOL. 34, NO. 1, PAGES 3-7 ISSN 0148-5806 I recently served as review editor on an article submitted to ECTJ by Richard Clark titled "Evidence for Confounding in Computer-Based Instruction Studies: Analyzing the Meta Analyses," (Clark, 1985). While I fussed over some aspects of the first draft, I thought Clark did a good job of highlighting some of the issues involved in comparing computer-based instruction (CBI) with "traditional" instruction (TI) (or, for that matter, comparing any instructional media and/or methods). In particular, Clark argued that the superiority of CBI over TI in comparison studies might have been either overestimated due to a failure to control
[1] J. Kulik,et al. Effects of Computer-Based Teaching on Secondary School Students. , 1983 .
[2] Sandra Scarr,et al. Constructing psychology: Making facts and fables for our times. , 1985 .
[3] R. Clark. Evidence for confounding in computer-based instruction studies: Analyzing the meta-analyses , 1985 .
[4] Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al. Effectiveness of Computer-based College Teaching: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1980 .