The trouble with CTD100.

The computed tomography dose index (CTDI100) is typically measured using a 100 mm long pencil ion chamber with cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dosimetry phantoms. While this metric was useful in the era of single slice CT scanners with collimated slice thicknesses of 10 mm or less, the efficiency of this metric in multi-slice CT scanners with wide (40 mm) collimated x-ray beams is unknown. Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the efficiency of the CTDI100 parameter for wider beam collimations. The simulations utilized the geometry of a commercially available CT scanner, with modeled polyenergetic x-ray spectra. Dose spread functions (DSFs) were computed along the length of 12.4 mm diam rods placed at several radii in infinitely long 160 mm diam (head) and 320 mm diam (body) PMMA phantoms. The DSFs were used to compute radiation dose profiles for slice thicknesses from 1 to 400 mm. CTDI00 efficiency was defined as the fraction of the dose along a PMMA rod collected in a 100 mm length centered on the CT slice position, divided by the total dose deposited along an infinitely long PMMA rod. For a 10 mm slice thickness, a 120 kVp x-ray spectrum, and the PMMA head phantom, the efficiency of the CTDI00 was 82% and 90% for the center and peripheral holes, respectively. The corresponding efficiency values for the body phantom were 63% and 88%. These values are reduced by only 1% when a 40 mm slice thickness was studied, so the use of CTDI00 for 40 mm wide x-ray beams is no less valid than its use for 10 mm beam widths. However, these data illustrate that the efficiency of the CTDI100 measurement even with 10 mm beam widths is low and, consequently, dose computations which are derived from this metric may not be as accurate as desirable.

[1]  J M Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation. , 2000, Medical physics.

[2]  J. Boone,et al.  Monte Carlo assessment of computed tomography dose to tissue adjacent to the scanned volume. , 2000, Medical physics.

[3]  C H McCollough,et al.  Calculation of effective dose. , 2000, Medical physics.

[4]  J. Boone,et al.  Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT. , 2002, Radiology.

[5]  Robert L Dixon,et al.  A new look at CT dose measurement: beyond CTDI. , 2003, Medical physics.

[6]  J. J. Broerse,et al.  Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  Thomas B. Shope,et al.  A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. , 1981 .

[8]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[9]  B. Fallone,et al.  Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT. , 2004, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[10]  J A Seibert,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of x-ray fluorescence in x-ray detectors. , 1999, Medical physics.

[11]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  It is time to retire the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose optimization. Against the proposition. , 2006, Medical physics.

[13]  David J Brenner,et al.  Is it time to retire the CTDI for CT quality assurance and dose optimization? , 2005, Medical physics.

[14]  K. Murase,et al.  Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry. , 2005, Medical physics.

[15]  J. Boone,et al.  Small-animal X-ray dose from micro-CT. , 2004, Molecular imaging.

[16]  W. Huda Dose and image quality in CT , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[17]  J. Boone Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data. , 2002, Medical physics.

[18]  R. Morin,et al.  Physics and dosimetry in computed tomography. , 2003, Cardiology clinics.

[19]  M H Buonocore,et al.  Monte Carlo validation in diagnostic radiological imaging. , 2000, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[20]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.