On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology

P 0 I I Opinion is intended to facilitate communication between reader and author and reader and reader. Comments, viewpoints or suggestions arising from published papers are welcome. N Discussion and debate about important issues in ecology, e.g. theory or terminology, may I I also be included. Contributions should be as precise as possible and references should be P 0 kept to a minimum. A summary is not required. O N

[1]  L. Fahrig,et al.  On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .

[2]  Michael J. Conroy,et al.  Parameter Estimation, Reliability, and Model Improvement for Spatially Explicit Models of Animal Populations , 1995 .

[3]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The equilibrium assumption in estimating the parameters of metapopulation models. , 2000 .

[4]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[5]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF SURVIVAL AND MIGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN METAPOPULATIONS , 2000 .

[6]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Predicting the Occurrence of Endangered Species in Fragmented Landscapes , 1996, Science.

[8]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[9]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Long‐Term Dynamics in a Metapopulation of the American Pika , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[10]  M. Shaw,et al.  Simulation of population expansion and spatial pattern when individual dispersal distributions do not decline exponentially with distance , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology , 1997 .

[12]  I. Hanski.  A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[13]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Landscape mosaics and ecological theory , 1995 .