A preclinical large animal study on a novel intervertebral fusion cage covered with high porosity titanium sheets with a triple pore structure used for spinal fusion

PurposeTo evaluate the osteoconductivity and the bonding strength of the newly developed interbody cage covered with the porous titanium sheet (porous Ti cage) to vertebral bodies in a sheep model.MethodsTwelve sheep underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L2–3 and L4–5 using either the new porous Ti cages (Group-P) or conventional Ti cages with autogenous iliac bone (Group-C). The animals were euthanized at 2 or 4 months postoperatively and subjected to radiological, biomechanical, and histological examinations.ResultsComputed tomography analyses showed that the ratio of bone contact area in Group-P was significantly increased at 4 months compared with that at 2 months (p = 0.01). Although the ratio of bone contact area in Group-C was significantly higher than Group-P at 2 months (p < 0.001), there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 4 months. Biomechanical test showed that there was no significant difference in bonding strength between the two groups at either 2 or 4 months. Histological analyses revealed that the bone apposition ratio increased significantly with time in Group-P (p < 0.001). Although Group-C showed significantly higher bone apposition ratio than Group-P at 2 months (p = 0.001), there was no statistical difference between the two groups at 4 months.ConclusionsThere was bone ingrowth into the porous Ti sheet, and bonding capacity of the porous Ti cage to the host bone increased with time. However, the speed of union to the bone with a porous Ti cage was marginally lower than a conventional cage along with an autogenous bone graft. Although it needs further experiment with a larger sample size, the results of the current study suggested that this material could achieve interbody fusion without the need for bone grafts.

[1]  A. Yamamoto,et al.  Cell Proliferation, Corrosion Resistance and Mechanical Properties of Novel Titanium Foam with Sheet Shape , 2012 .

[2]  J. Day,et al.  Bone ingrowth in well-fixed retrieved porous tantalum implants. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  Abhay Pandit,et al.  Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applications. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[4]  A. Minami,et al.  Effect of Hydroxyapatite porous characteristics on healing outcomes in rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion model , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[5]  T. Albert,et al.  Graft Options in Posterolateral and Posterior Interbody Lumbar Fusion , 2010, Spine.

[6]  C. Woiciechowsky,et al.  The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[7]  C. Colnot Cell sources for bone tissue engineering: insights from basic science. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[8]  M. Murata,et al.  Biodegradation and bioabsorption innovation of the functionally graded bovine bone-originated apatite with blood permeability. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[9]  A. Minami,et al.  A biomechanical and histological evaluation of a bioresorbable lumbar interbody fusion cage. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[10]  Hai-sheng Li,et al.  Bone ingrowth characteristics of porous tantalum and carbon fiber interbody devices: an experimental study in pigs. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  M. A. Glasby,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN SHEEP , 1994 .

[12]  M. Sakamoto,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Superporous Ceramics Bone Tissue Scaffold Materials with Triple Pore Structure A) Hydroxyapatite, B) Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate , 2012 .

[13]  Masanori Nakasu,et al.  Development of superporous hydroxyapatites and their examination with a culture of primary rat osteoblasts. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  Michel Assad,et al.  Porous titanium-nickel for intervertebral fusion in a sheep model: part 1. Histomorphometric and radiological analysis. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[15]  M. Neo,et al.  A porous bioactive titanium implant for spinal interbody fusion: an experimental study using a canine model. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[16]  T. Albert,et al.  Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[17]  H. Rack,et al.  Titanium alloys in total joint replacement--a materials science perspective. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[18]  Hai-sheng Li,et al.  Pedicle Screw Fixation Enhances Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Porous Tantalum Cages: An Experimental Study in Pigs , 2005, Spine.

[19]  Hideo Nakajima,et al.  Metallic Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration , 2009, Materials.

[20]  A. Yamamoto,et al.  Novel multilayer Ti foam with cortical bone strength and cytocompatibility. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  A. Minami,et al.  Evaluation of hydroxyapatite ceramic vertebral spacers with different porosities and their binding capability to the vertebral body: an experimental study in sheep. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[22]  B. Chang,et al.  Fusion Rates and Subsidence of Morselized Local Bone Grafted in Titanium Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Quantitative Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans , 2010, Spine.

[23]  L. Claes,et al.  Are Sheep Spines a Valid Biomechanical Model for Human Spines? , 1997, Spine.

[24]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Blood permeability of a novel ceramic scaffold for bone morphogenetic protein-2. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[25]  F. Zhao,et al.  Meta-analysis of instrumented posterior interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.