Fusion neutron diagnostics on ITER tokamak

ITER is an experimental nuclear reactor, aiming to demonstrate the feasibility of nuclear fusion realization in order to use it as a new source of energy. ITER is a plasma device (tokamak type) which will be equipped with a set of plasma diagnostic tools to satisfy three key requirements: machine protection, plasma control and physics studies by measuring about 100 different parameters. ITER diagnostic equipment is integrated in several ports at upper, equatorial and divertor levels as well internally in many vacuum vessel locations. The Diagnostic Systems will be procured from ITER Members (Japan, Russia, India, United States, Japan, Korea and European Union) mainly with the supporting structures in the ports. The various diagnostics will be challenged by high nuclear radiation and electromagnetic fields as well by severe environmental conditions (ultra high vacuum, high thermal loads). Several neutron systems with different sensitivities are foreseen to measure ITER expected neutron emission from 1014 up to almost 1021 n/s. The measurement of total neutron emissivity is performed by means of Neutron Flux Monitors (NFM) installed in diagnostic ports and by Divertor Neutron Flux Monitors (DNFM) plus MicroFission Chambers (MFC) located inside the vacuum vessel. The neutron emission profile is measured with radial and vertical neutron cameras. Spectroscopy is accomplished with spectrometers looking particularly at 2.5 and 14 MeV neutron energy. Neutron Activation System (NAS), with irradiation ends inside the vacuum vessel, provide neutron yield data. A calibration strategy of the neutron diagnostics has been developed foreseeing in situ and cross calibration campaigns. An overview of ITER neutron diagnostic systems and of the associated challenging engineering and integration issues will be reported.

[1]  Henrik Bindslev,et al.  Chapter 7: Diagnostics , 2007 .

[2]  A. V. Krasil’nikov,et al.  A conceptual project for a divertor monitor of the neutron yield in the ITER , 2006 .

[3]  H. G. Lee,et al.  In-vessel design of ITER diagnostic neutron activation system. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[4]  Daniele Marocco,et al.  Neutronic design of the ITER radial neutron camera , 2007 .

[5]  George Vayakis,et al.  Integration of ITER in-vessel diagnostic components in the vacuum vessel , 2009 .

[6]  S. Popovichev,et al.  Chapter 9: Fusion Product Diagnostics , 2008 .

[7]  C. Walker,et al.  Engineering aspects of integration of ITER divertor diagnostics , 2011 .

[8]  C. Walker,et al.  A Multichannel Neutron Collimator for the ITER Tokamak , 2004 .

[9]  T. Nishitani,et al.  Design of microfission chamber for ITER operations. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[10]  M. Yamauchi,et al.  Engineering design of the ITER invessel neutron monitor using micro-fission chambers , 2007 .

[11]  M. Sugihara,et al.  Disruption scenarios, their mitigation and operation window in ITER , 2007 .

[12]  M. Sasao,et al.  Strategy for the absolute neutron emission measurement on ITER. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[13]  K. Ikeda.  Progress in the ITER Physics Basis , 2007 .

[14]  E. R. Hodgson,et al.  Chapter 12: Generic Diagnostic Issues for a Burning Plasma Experiment , 2008 .

[15]  Yang Qingwei,et al.  Fusion Neutron Flux Monitor for ITER , 2008 .

[16]  Giuseppe Gorini,et al.  Status of ITER neutron diagnostic development , 2005 .